Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(NC) Republican (State Senator): (Movie) Scripts need reviewing (by government)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 05:46 PM
Original message
(NC) Republican (State Senator): (Movie) Scripts need reviewing (by government)
Raleigh | Citing the controversy surrounding the Dakota Fanning film Hounddog, the leader of the state Senate Republicans says he wants the government to review scripts before cameras start rolling in North Carolina.

That system, said state Sen. Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, would apply only to films seeking the state's lucrative filmmaker incentive, which refunds as much as 15 percent of what productions spend in North Carolina from the state treasury.

"Why should North Carolina taxpayers pay for something they find objectionable?" said Berger, who is having proposed legislation drafted.

It is not known whether Hounddog's producers have or will apply for the incentive. A call Thursday to the N.C. Department of Revenue, which oversees incentive payments, was not returned.

http://www.wilmingtonstar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070126/NEWS/701260363
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. One more place the Government has no business having their hands in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Funny how Republicans will scream bloody murder about government
oversight and regulation of business and industry, but have no problem with trying to legislate societal standards and morality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. or political censorship disguised as legislating societal "standards" and "morality". (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Perhaps we should all just submit our entire lives over to the government
But I doubt that even then these fascist bastards would be satisfied.

I am coming to the belief that nothing less than a "Matrix" existence for citizens would be satisfactory for those currently in power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. I find that movie very disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. If find that congressman very disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Fortunately, the dipsh!t isn't in Congress. Unfortunately, he IS in the NC General Assembly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wageslave71 Donating Member (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Isn't that ironic?
Do you think NC taxpayers should refund money spent by a filmmaker whose movie that you found to be, oh, lets say racist? Let me guess, that would be different, right?

I think the options are to give the incentives to all or none. Elected officials don't have the right to pick and choose based on their own personal values. Personally, I tend to oppose using taxpayer's money as an incentive even in the form of tax relief to lure private business into an area. But, since it already happens in some places, other places have to do the same to compete. It amounts to corporate welfare and is way too widespread IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good plan...
That way we can tax subsidize all of those "Good Christian" movies the public loves so much. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's funny ... wasn't there some totalitarian regime which carefully screened
everything that was made, just to make sure that "the right message" was sent out to the collective?

Hmm, what was their name? I seem to remember the initials U.S.S.R. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. not a chance of a snowflake in hot place
NC Dems have the majority in state sen and house.

The republicans will introduce alot of stuff that won't go anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. There's an interesting thing called the "Power off" Button on the TV N/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh, fuck THAT.
They can all go fuck themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Perhaps this idiots needs to take a step into real life.
I've taught eight-year-old girls in my third grade public school classroom who have been rape survivors- gang rapes, rapes by family members and one whose mother sold her child's body to score some meth. So, a scene which shows a child's expression as she's being raped is now controversial? Please, it's a wake up call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R_M Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fascists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC