Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Vietnam Shades Warner's Iraq Stand (Silent Then, Senator Won't Be This Time)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 04:58 AM
Original message
WP: Vietnam Shades Warner's Iraq Stand (Silent Then, Senator Won't Be This Time)
Edited on Sun Jan-28-07 05:09 AM by Pirate Smile
Vietnam Shades Warner's Iraq Stand
Silent Then, Senator Won't Be This Time


By Michael D. Shear
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 28, 2007; Page A01

Virginia Sen. John W. Warner's words betray the guilt he still carries about the Vietnam War and help explain why this pillar of the Republican establishment is leading a bipartisan revolt against the war plans of a president in his own party.

"I regret that I was not more outspoken" during the Vietnam War, the former Navy secretary said in an interview in his Capitol Hill office. "The Army generals would come in, 'Just send in another five or ten thousand.' You know, month after month. Another ten or fifteen thousand. They thought they could win it. We kept surging in those years. It didn't work."

Is that a lesson for what's going on in Iraq?

"Well, you don't forget something like that," he answers. There is a long pause, he closes his eyes and his voice gets softer. "No. You don't forget those things."

More than 30 years after Vietnam, Warner is once again watching as generals propose additional troops. But this time, he's not staying silent. In a rebuke to President Bush, Warner is leading an effort to have the U.S. Senate declare a lack of confidence in the administration's plans to send 21,500 additional soldiers into the Iraqi war zone.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/27/AR2007012701478.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Lesson Learned"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think the generals proposed more troops
it was Kagan and Keane, a neocon and a retired general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is this sanctimonious hypocrite up for re-election in 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. I would be more impressed if Warner just said Kerry was right and I should have joined him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He did on one talk show say Kerry's medals were deserved in 2004
In 2004, admitting that Kerry was right in his 1971 protest could have helped. He may have not been there then - I wonder how much Kerry's often repeated comment that half the names on the Vietnam wall were of people who died after the leaders knew the policy was wrong.

Maybe he should speak to his Democratic peer, Webb, who even last week - disputed Kerry's personal comment of speaking against VN by citing a poll that he said showed 80% of the people backed VN in 1972! (He cherry picked a question that was essentially Is it important to leave South Vietnam in good shape?)

I'm impressed that Warner is taking responsibity for NOT speaking out when he should have in 1971.

I was also impressed that he was far kinder and showed more respect to Senator Kerry when most Democrats as well as the Republicans really hit him on Kerry/Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Warner, Hagel, Lugar, Snowe...finally allowing their humanity to speak, for a change..
The forced compliance of the Frist/Delay era is gone. The R representatives must have been having nightmares as they enabled the R's in the WH to do whatever they wanted with the lives of young Americans and Iraqi citizens.

It's about time people, keep speaking up. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oak2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. When impeachment time comes
there will be 67 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Forced compliance? More like utter moral cowardice.
Spineless politicians on the war bandwagon couldn't wait for he victory parade! Nice going assholes. They think nothing of the troops and civilians who will DIE and BE MAIMED by their failure to lead, only their goddamn poll numbers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC