NYT: U.S. Reconfigures the Way Iraq and Afghanistan Casualty Totals Are Given

U.S. Reconfigures the Way Casualty Totals Are Given
By DENISE GRADY
Published: February 2, 2007

Statistics on a Pentagon Web site have been reorganized in a way that lowers the published totals of American nonfatal casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Dr. Michael Kilpatrick, deputy director of force health protection and readiness at the Defense Department, said the previous method of tallying casualties was misleading and might have made injuries and combat wounds seem worse and more numerous than they really were.

The old method lumped many problems under the label “casualties,” including illnesses, minor injuries and injuries from accidents, as well as wounds sustained in combat. But the public may assume that every casualty is a war wound, Dr. Kilpatrick said, so the site was changed to avoid misunderstandings.

On Monday, the bottom line of the Defense Department’s Web page on casualties in Iraq listed a total of 47,657 “nonmortal casualties.”

By Tuesday, the same page no longer showed a total for nonmortal casualties. The bottom line is now “total — medical air transported,” and the figure is 31,493....

***

Paul Sullivan, director of research and analysis of Veterans for America, said the changes actually meant the Pentagon was trying to conceal the rising toll of injuries and illness....

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/us/02wounded.html

JUST WONDERING.


MILITARY HAS AIDED AND ABETTED BUSH EVER SINCE THE MORNING OF 911/

:wtf:

The Military Times newspapers published a massive new poll after questioning 6,000 randomly selected active-duty members of the Armed Forces. The results ran counter to much of the conventional wisdom -- barely one in three service members approve of the way the president is handling the war; a majority believe it was wrong to go into Iraq in the first place; and a plurality reject the notion of sending additional troops into the war.

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003526245

duty are entrenched in positions of influence and power.

Those who put duty first are being retired or replaced.

MKJ

they have mortgages to pay and they fear for their own families if they complain. YOu just have to look what is controlling the military.