Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wesley Clark Testifies Against Milosevic in War Crimes Trial

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:44 AM
Original message
Wesley Clark Testifies Against Milosevic in War Crimes Trial
<clips>

Wesley Clark Testifies Against Milosevic in War Crimes Trial That Could Serve As Model For Saddam’s Prosecution

Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark ended his first day of testimony in the war crimes trial of Slobodan Milosevic yesterday. Clarke is the former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO and the man who led the 78-day bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999.

Milosevic is officially charged with genocide and crimes against humanity in a number of indictments spanning from the wars in Croatia and Bosnia to the fighting in Kosovo. He is a candidate for the Socialist Party in Serbia's parliamentary elections on 28 December.

In an unprecedented agreement between the court and the United States, Washington will be allowed to review Clark's testimony before it is made public. The U.S. will have two days to apply for parts of the testimony to be removed from the public record if it considers them harmful to US national interests. An edited recording is due to be made public on Friday.

Clark said before testifying that he expected to give information on more than 100 hours of meetings over four years with Milosevic during the 1990s.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/16/167216



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, I wonder why W doesn't want this made public???
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. could it be his daddies
dealings with the serbs? remember bush dismissed the war, it wasn`t any of our business....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. For the same reason that they voted against the Intl. Criminal Court
WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

<clips>

The United States and the International Criminal Court

The United States of America was one of only 7 nations (joining China, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Qatar and Israel) to vote against the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in 1998.

The Bush administration's hostility to the ICC has increased dramatically in 2002. The crux of the U.S. concern relates to the prospect that the ICC may exercise its jurisdiction to conduct politically motivated investigations and prosecutions of U.S. military and political officials and personnel. The U.S. opposition to the ICC is in stark contrast to the strong support for the Court by most of America's closest allies.

In an unprecedented diplomatic maneuver on 6 May, the Bush administration effectively withdrew the U.S. signature on the treaty. At the time, the Ambassador-at-large for War Crimes Issues Pierre-Richard Prosper stated that the administration was "not going to war" with the Court. This has proved false; the renunciation of the treaty has paved the way for a comprehensive U.S. campaign to undermine the ICC.

First, the Bush administration negotiated a Security Council resolution to provide an exemption for U.S. personnel operating in U.N. peacekeeping operations. The administration failed in May to obtain an exemption for peacekeepers in East Timor. In June the Bush administration vetoed an extension of the UN peacekeeping mission for Bosnia-Herzegovina unless the Security Council granted a complete exemption. Ultimately, the U.S. failed in its bid for an iron-clad exemption, although the Security Council approved a limited, one year exemption for U.S. personnel participating in UN peacekeeping missions or UN authorized operations. The Security Council has expressed its intention to renew this exemption on 30 June next year.

http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/icc/us.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonoboy Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wesley Clark = American Hero & Patriot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. This would be such a good time
for all of this to be shown on television - show the world what it should be like - I can only think the administration doesn't want this shown or attention even brought to it. They act like it never happened and it is never mentioned until they're trying to get something they want - then - it's Clinton did this so we should be able to also. You know - leak and drip as they see fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DakotaDemocrat Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you...
Can't wait for the video to come out on this. I'm glad that Clark is NOT using this for political gian, just having him there and testify, especially around the time of Saddam's capture, is good timing.

Bush says "Good Riddance" in front of his sheeple.

Clark testifies to the world that he went into the hornet's nest, put a finger in Slobodan's chest and backed him down, saving over a million and half people...

Classic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC