Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDA panel says Morning After pills ok to sell over the counter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 05:54 PM
Original message
FDA panel says Morning After pills ok to sell over the counter
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 05:56 PM by alg0912
CNN just now, no link

Pro Choice groups: 1
Pro Life groups: 0

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Even if the FDA says it, Bush might try to stop it
Science and facts means nothing to these fanatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kixot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Woohoo!!
Just think of all of the women who won't have to risk being taunted, threatened, and verbally abused when approaching a clinic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's your link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is the greatest news!!!!!!! Here's another link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Outstanding!!!!!!
Much cheaper, safer, and more private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Holy cow. That's amazing.
There is no way in hell Bush is going to let that stand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. Especially when * has denied all women
the right to their bodies with anti-abortion legislation...but, hell...it's OK...backstreet abortions will rise, more women will die, and others will buy a pill to stop pregnancy in its tracks. </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unity Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Does anyone know if the admin. can stop this yet? What is the procedure?
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Repukes could try to pass a law in congress
trying to ban it.

Once again old white men want to tell what women should do with their bodies!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Watch out for these men, who hope to tell you what to do with your body:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
42. sick picture of the American Taliban....
...and that's exactly what they are. B*sta*ds..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
46. The FDA does not have to follow the panel's advice
that's how the administration can stop it. Make the FDA head know in no uncertain terms that this is NOT to be approved as an OTC drug.

it's rare, but the FDA does not have to follow the advice of its advisory panels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. On NPR this morning
I heard a woman who was part of some conservative group who was against these pills, totally. Not whether or not they were over the counter, but just against them because a fertilzed egg was possibly in existence...

even in the case of rape or incest or any other thing you can think of.

...in addition, she said that the pill would "reward" females who do not live a "chaste" life...or whatever the term was she used.

in other words, again, these idiots want to punish females if they are sexually active and make a mistake.

the repukes are gonna get backlash from pandering to their extremist right, imo, if they do anything to stop this. And they should get shit if such stupidity is allowed to interfere with a woman who may be in a crisis situation, for whatever reason.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
60. Too bad women like these can't be forced...
to have each of their eggs fertilized and give birth to each one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
61. Are they also against birth control pills?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metisnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
63. Private Lynch
I would love to ask that old bag how she would feel for jessica lynch had she gotten pregnant due to her "rape". I love using that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. This news has to make the fundies go NUTS
Because women can have control over their bodies.

From the Yahoo article, here's some of the crap the Anti-Choice folks are spewing:

Opponents argued that women and teenage girls would rely on Plan B and abandon regular contraceptives. (Lynne's Note - You know the condom breaks sometimes, nice to have a backup plan) If women think they don't need to use condoms, they would risk acquiring sexually transmitted diseases, some opponents said.

"Over-the-counter availability of the morning-after pill will lead to increased promiscuity and its attendant physical and psychological damage," (Lynne's Note: Blah, Blah, Blah - this is the same thing they said about the pill. Get out of my freaking bedroom!!!) Robert Carroll, a retired physician from Pittsburgh, told the panel.

Others spoke against Plan B because they view emergency contraceptives as equivalent to abortion. Some research suggests the pills prevent implantation of a fertilized egg. (Lynne's Note: You know how many fertilized eggs just never make it even without outside interventions)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. So let me get this straight:
Women would abandon their $30/month pills (or, if they have insurance, whatever their copay is -- mine's $10), or their $12-for-a-big-box of condoms for a single-use kit that costs $25 each time (now, and it's not clear whether prices will change) and has more side effects.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. It is not recommended as an alternative to other birth control methods.
It is intended to be an option in situations where other methods were not used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Oh, give us a freaking break!
I've always been responsible about birth control, but as Lynn noted, condoms aren't always 100% effective, so I had to use Plan B on one occation. I sure as hell wasn't looking forward to it, as birth control pills make me nauseous and I thought Plan B would have the same effect X 100 (luckily, not so). I'm guessing that you are male and never have taken pills that mess with your hormones, but believe me, it ain't pleasant! I can think of no woman on earth with any experience with such medications that would opt for Plan B as their primary means of birth control!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kutastha Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. I'm pretty sure...
...the poster was being sarcastic regarding the opponents' arguments that woman would abandon birth control and how instead of paying only a bit for OCP and condoms, they'd pay $25 a pop for RU-486.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alenne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. RU-486 is about $350 a pop. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. And RU-486 is NOT "morning after"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
62. At that price the repugs were nuts to complain
How many women really would have the money to pay for it?

The repugs would had been better off just keeping their mouth zipped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #62
67. Emergency contraception is less expensive than RU-486
Mifepristone/RU-486 is an oral abortafacient. It is not taken the morning after unprotected sex. It is taken after pregnancy has been confirmed and the woman desires to terminate the confirmed pregnancy. The price is fairly steep and, because of the potential for complications, it is only available with prescription and under the guidance of a qualified medical professional.

Emergency contraception is a high dose of oral contraceptive. It will not abort an established pregnancy. It is far, far, far less expensive than Mifepristone, and if made available over the counter will allow women the opportunity to PREVENT unwanted pregnancies rather than terminate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. Indeed
I was pointing out the idiocy of the idea that women would stop using birth control.

To me, that's as dumb as saying, "I'm not going to wear my seatbelt because I've got really good medical coverage."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
40. Sorry I wasn't clear -- I agree with you...
I was trying to point out the illogic of thinking that women will abandon regular, reliable birth control because expensive, uncomfortable emergency options are now available.

(I'm a woman of reproductive age and I've never used Plan B -- and I can't imagine anyone choosing to do so as primary birth control, or really for any reason other than emergency.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. Sick as a dog
At least, thats what my friend felt like for a couple days after she took it. NOT a preferable alternative to condoms or the Pill, in anyone's opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #37
58. I think it would make most women
feel extremely ill. I just have wacky hormones to begin with, so I was lucky.

A doctor friend of mine has told women for years that if there's an "accident", they should take several birth control pills the next morning-I guess Plan B is pretty much the same thing. No woman would see spending two days puking as an easy alternative to regular birth control, which is what happens to most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. great news. Local Public Health Depts (CA) have been providing
"morning after pill" routinely. Much better alternative to unplanned pregnancies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Excellent news!
And it's about time we had some good news regarding women's health and family planning.

Thank you!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well blow me over! I'm shocked this was okayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sujan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Can someone explain me what this pill does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. From the above Newsday article:
Morning-after pills are higher doses of the hormones in regular birth control pills. If a woman already is pregnant, they have no effect. They work by preventing ovulation or fertilization, and possibly by interfering with implantation of a fertilized egg into the uterus, the medical definition of pregnancy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. prevents implantation of ferilized egg. Don't know tech process. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. plus above items
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kutastha Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. mifepristone
blocks progesterone receptors, so pregnancy cannot be maintained. The lining of the uterus sheds, preventing implantation, or if early enough in pregancy will abort the fertilized egg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. mifepristone is not the morning after pill
Mifepristone is the "abortion" pill, RU-486, and it does induce abortion of an implanted egg/embryo. I'm not an expert on it, but I believe it can be used successfully during the first trimester of pregnancy.

The morning after pill does not abort implanted eggs; it only prevents ovulation and/or the fertilization of a mature, released ovum.

The FDA ruling WOULD NOT make mifepristone available without a prescription.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. Finally! Some good news!
Now, let's see the Republicans fight this one. If/when they do, it damned well better backfire on their male sorry asses! Goddess, how I hate those f***s!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. The Reich wing fundamentalists will demand that Congress act to stop this.
They absolutely hate sound science and good public health policy. I do not think they have the votes to overturn this though so Congress may just ignore them. Democrats should find a way to publicize the opponents of this and paint them as representative of the republican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh yes, my sisters, this is wondeful news!
Let us just hope that the FDA goes along with the panel and that the BFEE doesn't try to screw it up.

No offense guys, but can you imagine if it were the males who got pregnant? I think of that all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. I just heard a remark from some woman against this on the news
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 06:58 PM by GloriaSmith
She said life begins at conception, not at implantation.

When life begins is a philosophical question. I personally don't believe a life is created the second a sperm enters into an egg. Implantation is a defining moment in the whole process and without it, there is no heartbeat, no brain, no brainwaves, no fingers and toes because there is no fetus. So are these people pro-zygote? Is that what it comes down to?

on edit: We know how to get Bush on board...have the pharmacuetical companies lobby for it. He's a sucker for that sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. a sperm is alive.. so live is even pre-ejaculation...
but that does not mean that we should put the life of a sperm over that of a woman. Nor should we put the life of a fetus over the life of a woman. It's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. If a sperm is "life," then. . . . .
male masturbation AND condom use are forms of mass murder.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
64. That is why Pope's have been against male masturbation
And who was it in the bible? Onan that spilled his seed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Heh, some indeed do put the life of a sperm over the life of a woman
reminder that insurance companies were paying for Viagra, but not for birth control pills. :-)

Women will get what they need regarding the control over their own bodies and their families, surreptitiosly if need be, as always they have ever done. It only needs to be protected by a secular government in order to protect the lives of it's women citizens. If that is not forthcoming, women will see to it that they get what they need in spite of it.

Men, faced with a limp, impotent, dick, no matter what they do to try to cajole it into action, get, it seems to me, into a panic situation--like at the age of seventy five, they should still be able to behave as twenty year old, randy studs and impregnate a woman-of course, that woman is never their wife of the past fifty years--it is the twenty year old woman they are now interested in,many in their fanatsies, and some in reality, as long as the viagra alows them to think they are the randy young uns they once were. It is amusing and sad at that same time.

Such is the human ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. an IUD prevents implantation - doesn't it?
these fundies make me crazy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. THey don't approve of the IUD
or any other type of birth control that prevents implantation. Condoms, Diaphrams and prayer method is about all they think is ok!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. well, I've got a 26 year old that proves prayer doesn't work :=)
.. but these are the same people that are lining up to adopt all of these unplanned babies -no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
34. While this is great news.....I'm now expecting anti-choice groups to
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 08:08 PM by Gloria
now start the ball rolling to get this blocked.

I'm sure Walmart won't sell it...they don't sell prescription morning after pills. What F**cks.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
65. Do they sell condoms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
41. great news, they've been selling in Europe for years but...
...Bu$hCo fundies and extremeists will certainly try to stop this, saying they're 'dangerous' or some such self-serving BS...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
43. I am unequivocably pro choice, but this move troubles me
This is a serious medication that I'm not sure should be sold over the counter. It can have a lot of side effects and is not something that every woman should use, therefore a doctor should be seen before it is used.

You can't even buy antibiotics without a prescription in this country. You shouldn't be able to buy a medication that causes a woman's body to expell a fertilized ovum without one either. If it doesn't work in preventing implantation, the medication causes birth defects, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suspicious Donating Member (780 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Nevermind...
Edited on Wed Dec-17-03 01:45 PM by Suspicious
I was wrong...except for the fact that many people are confusing this with RU-486. :)

I have read that someone who is already pregnant will not cause harm to the fetus if they accidentally take the morning-after pill, though. (By "accidentally", I mean if they take the pill and are unaware that they are already pregnant)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Birth defects?
Do you have a link to the information that this drug can cause birth defects? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. The FDA disagrees with you.
Frankly I think their opinion carries a little more weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misinformed01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #43
54. Noonwitch...I can just about promise you
that if there were going to be birth defect issues with this drug, no company in their right mind would touch it for the lawsuits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. That would be highly inaccurate info
Emergency contraception is simply a high dose of the same hormones found in regular birth control pills. Preven, one brand, contains both Progestin and Estrogen. The other brand contains only Progestin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #43
59. It concerns me too
My morning after pill experience made me very ill and some of my friends had a similiar experience. Plan B may be safer than what I took, which was several regular birth control pills. I know that several OTC drugs can have severe side effects in some people too, but it still worries me. The morning after pill is an overdose of a perscription drug so it does not make sense to me that this would be over the counter. I do want this to be available to women who need it, but I fear that it may be unsafe. I suppose the FDA knows best, but I am suprised that no one raised this as a concern for opposition instead of the promiscuity arguement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ratty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
45. Concerned Women on America
Everytime I saw this on the news they had to give air time to that petty shill for Phylis Schlafly. Talking about possible long-range medical problems, blah blah blah. Oh yeah, Concerned Women for America, our nation's premiere authority on Medicine and Public Health.

That's to be expected I guess. Absolutely no study on long-term effects would ever satisfy them. If it's a ten-year study then they'll demand twenty years. Why don't they just come right out and say every sperm is precious? But I guess what makes me mad is that they're even given air time, as if they're legitimate. What's happened to our beloved liberal media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
50. and no studies that would give any insight into the father's
contribution? I would hope that some smart lady, who perhaps forgot to take her vitamin pills,or follow the ADA pyramid for good nutrition, or forgets to take her folic acid supplement, and is arrested for negligence (which is where I think a law like this can lead after a while) challenges this and points to the father who smoked pot, took one too many drinks, snorted cocaine or took other drugs, and impregnated her with a sperm that was flawed, causing an eventual miscarriage or still birth.

Would love to see it. Women--we need to hollar louder. These bloviating, Viagra addicted, pot bellied, perhaps even incontinent,smelly old, has-been, men are bent upon making women mere vessels for their (men's) spawn, without acknowledging a woman has a life or a body of her own. In fact, they do certainly think she has not! It belongs to them and others like them who are threatened by women's sexuality and frightened by women's blood. They have come further than ever before toward forcing us back into the middle ages. We do not need it from these sanctimonius religious,wild eyed, male fanatics and their female, tight lipped counterparts, who are fixated on sex, whatever form it takes and bent upon forcing every woman to believe as they do re a "soul" that is present in a four celled blob of tissue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
51. What a victory!!
What will the pro-lifers do now - Start blowing up drugstores and shooting down Pharmacists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. YES!
I was going to send the FDA a plea after hearing all of the dumbasses arguing against it on the news. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Here! Here!
Welcome to DU Callous!! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
He loved Big Brother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. I wouldn't be surprised.
They aren't pro-life, they're anti-choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
56. "It Takes The Worry Out Of Being Close"
:-)

Old ad slogan - I think it was for Secret Deodorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
66. Outstanding News!!!!
Yeah!!! :D

We finally won one!!!

Hooray!! *doing cartwheels*

My body, my choice. Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC