Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jobless Claims Drop More Than Expected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:45 AM
Original message
Jobless Claims Drop More Than Expected
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The number of Americans lining up for an initial week of jobless benefits fell sharply last week, the government said on Thursday in a better-than-expected report suggesting the labor market is improving.

First-time claims for state unemployment aid, a rough guide to the pace of layoffs, plunged 22,000 to 353,000 in the week ended Dec. 13 from a revised 375,000 in the prior week, the Labor Department (news - web sites) said.

The drop brought claims back to the 2-3/4 year low they hit in early November.

Wall Street economists had expected claims to drop to 365,000 from the 378,000 originally reported for the Dec. 6 week.

more: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=568&ncid=749&e=1&u=/nm/20031218/bs_nm/economy_jobless_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bully bully
Does that include the workers whose unemployment comp has run out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. That is exactly what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. When your benefits run out...
Unka Sam considers you have found employment. Whether you have or not. A Reagan-era carryover to make his economic situation look a little brighter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Link please?
'Cause it just ain't so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Next week they will revise the numbers upwards with no fanfare...Minnesota
reported major job losses yesterday and other states are suffering the same...these numbers are being played with on paper to provide the results that the Bushistas want; it's all smoke and mirrors. If the economists would get their asses out on the streets and see what's happening in the real world we would not be getting these rosy fake scenarios.
The job market dwindles day by day; this is not a recovery; it's not even a jobless recovery; it's a job-loss "recovery."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ze_dscherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Revision
The problem of constant revision has been adressed publicly some days ago. Seems to be a mistake in the gathering of the statistics. Last weeks numbers were actually revised down!

Problem is, these numbers are only "newly unemployed" and don't cover those whose benefits have run out, those who were forced in a badly paid part time job. Actual unemployment is much higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. It's not called the Dismal Science for nothing
If the economists would get their asses out on the streets and see what's happening in the real world we would not be getting these rosy fake scenarios.

Actual physical observation of the economy is just not part of economics. Remember, this is the field where Daniel Kahneman and Vernon L. Smith won the Nobel in 2002 for daring to consider psychology and lab experiments in their economic theories. 2002! You'd think someone would have thought to try this...oh...about 100 years ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Will this figure be revised also, like all the ones before it?
Every time they come up with anything positive, it seems we have to turn the stone over and see what crawls out from beneath it.

Irrespective of my cynicism, I find no comfort in learning that a third of a million people are newly unemployed, especially near Christmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe the Grinch got a heart
And decided not to lay people off so close to Christmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. From my own experiences with companies in the area, this is sort of
true, but not because they have a heart. December layoffs do not offer much benefit for the year end or quarter end books, but can be costly in employee moral and loss of productivity. You'll tend to see higher layoffs at the end of the 3rd quarter, beginning of the 4th quarter. December is too late for those on a calendar year basis.

If things are still bad you will again see a rise in February, March time frame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Funny how everything is turning around just in time for the election
year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Management is too busy shopping to hand out pink slips just now
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pippin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. lining up for an initial week of jobless benefits
note initial week. No mention of how many are currently collecting or the two million who will not be getting supplemntal benefits after their initial benefits run out thanks to the chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Continued claims, the number of people out of work for a week or more,
rose to 3.39 million for the week ended Dec. 6, the latest data available, from a revised 3.331 million the prior week.

http://money.cnn.com/2003/12/18/news/economy/jobless/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Gee, that's only another third of a million.
Hell, that's almost nuthin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. The thread started in GD about who was jobless was frightening!
Not only those w/o but the lengths of time these folks have been w/o jobs...

I don't care what they say or print from this regime...it isn't correct and one day after all this hussle/bussle when there isn't anything else like the holidays to shuffle data the truth will come out.

Let's see how they cook the numbers after January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zgrrl Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. Don't pop the champagne corks yet...
I have an opinion about current unemployment figures. The other day I was at the mall in my (fairly small) town of about 60K people. I stopped in at the Victoria's Secret because a friend of mine had told me that she had taken a part-time seasonal job there to get some extra holiday money and I wanted to see if she was there. I went up to the saleswoman at the counter and asked if my friend was working that shift. The woman (who looked to be about 18) told me that she didn't know my friend, was not familiar with her name, had no clue... because that store had hired 20 new people for the holiday season.

So just that one store hired 20 people. I bet if I asked all the stores in the mall, they all probably all hired at least one extra person for the holidays, but probably a lot more. If you add up the extra "jobs" created just in that one mall, it probably numbers in the high hundreds. And that's just one mall in one small town in one state. Add it up all across America, and it would seem like things are coming up roses.

Of course, all these jobs are only for the holidays, they pay crap, and they will be vanishing in January. Expect to see (buried) headlines in a month or so talking about unemployment claims suddenly rising.

Meanwhile, I noticed that IBM is going to be slashing something like 4000 jobs and shifting them to...let's see, was it India or China?:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. all those people ran out their unemployment...
...and are therefore no longer counted as unemployed. Doesn't mean they found jobs. It means they are simply non-numbers now.

Same crap they did in the 80s- early 90s. Just quit counting them by getting them off unemployment (letting it run out) then huge numbers of unemployed simply become uncounted non-nothings.

Convenient, eh? Rethug economics at work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. When do you suppose the stopped counting them?
Got a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. Meanwhile ...
... in George W. Hoover's America, homelessness and hunger are increasing for people who either can't get a job or can't get a decent-paying job. (link opens in a new window)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sven77 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. clinton to bush
i was making 25$ an hour during clinton years, under bush im struggling with 8$/hr. yah, tell me about it. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sorcerer3 Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. Jobless claims fallingis excellent!
I'm pleased that the jobless claims are falling. It's good news for america and the economy.

I found this story from Reuters as well:

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Manufacturing in the U.S. mid-Atlantic region surged powerfully and unexpectedly in December as new orders jumped to a 23-year high, in one of the clearest signs yet that factories have emerged from a two-year slump

This is excellent news! After reading the other day that inflation was at 38 YEAR LOWS really made me feel good about this economy. It's just what we need.

Hope for the future is much better than lamenting on the disparities of the past.

God Bless America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC