Lieberman Calls Dean a 'Divisive Leader'

By RANDALL CHASE, Associated Press Writer

NEWARK, Del. - Presidential hopeful Joe Lieberman (news - web sites) warned Friday against replacing "one divisive leader with another divisive leader," a swipe at both President Bush (news - web sites) and the front-runner for the Democratic Party's nomination, Howard Dean (news - web sites).

Voters in 2000 were almost evenly divided between Bush and the Democratic ticket of former Vice President Al Gore (news - web sites) and Lieberman. Bush eventually prevailed in one of the closest presidential elections in history.

Lieberman, a Connecticut senator struggling in the race to gain the 2004 nomination, on Friday added to his earlier criticism that Dean was taking Democrats backward by arguing that the former Vermont governor was a divisive force within the party.

"We're too divided," Lieberman said as he toured a technology plant in Delaware. "I don't want to replace one divisive leader with another divisive leader."

<snip>

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=694&u=/ap/20031219/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_2004_4&printer=1


Sure, ABB.. However, whomever wins the GENERAL ELECTION is supposed to be the representative of ALL of us. Not just Democrats. Question is, does Dean(or others) cut the mustard? Does he come close enough?

Or should we consider the other side vermit rats? To be ignored or power totally exterminated? Not worthy of having ANY representation in the white house? what's good for the goose is good for the gander? Are we the true Americans and not the Republicans?

Or do we need both?

Grok

it will be very difficult for him to be able to endorse Dean should he be nominated. He may as well endorse Bush and be done with it.

The Lieberman supporters might as well vote for Bush and be done with it. And go away They ain't that many anyway. They don't matter.

Grok

:puke:
I would like to hear directly from a Lieberman supporter.

After what 'Low' Joe has said about Dean, will he pledge to support the eventual Democratic nominee, even if it is Dean?

Since Joe supports Bush on the war, and sponsored his 'religion-in-government' legislation in the Senate, if the Democratic nominee is Dean, will Joe endorse Bush?

And remember, it was Lieberman's "count all the military votes" commnet in Florida (even the late, unsigned ballots) that went a long way to giving last election to Bush. No wonder Gore wants nothing to do with this guy.

Considering all this, I think it is likely Lieberman will endorse Bush if the Democrats pick Dean.

Well, Lieberman supporters ... what's the answers to the questions?

He had better hope he doesn't get nominated; talk about divisive!!
I will not vote for him.:boring: :nopity:

You know -- do the George Wallace thing. Wallace wouldn't endorse the eventual Democratic nominee either. Hopefully Lieberman's not that stupid.

Leiberman is down.

He's hurt.

Dean's working the body...uppercutting...jab...jab...

It's getting ugly.

The ref's gonna stop the fight.

Lieberman's through...he's finished...there's the bell...it's over...

I fear it also applies to '04. Dean may be the one on the canvas.

Enough of the kumbayah with the Repukes, Joe.

How're things? How's the baby? :hi:

if doesnt learn to sleep through the night, he's going up on ebay ....

On second thought, that would be an insult to all hard working sewer rats in the world!

that's our joe! he'd make a great VP candidate.

Most Americans will unite and not vote for this man.

Too bad his ego will not allow him to see it.

reps at their meeting for Lieberman and Kerry attacking Dean. My fellow Dean 2nd Congressional District coordinator represented the Dean campaign at that meeting. He said that the Lieberman rep said that their fundraising increased after the Gore endorsement of Dean. My friend in his spiel said that within a week, Dean's supporters raised over a million dollars -- under $700,000 for Gore and $550,000 plus for the vindictive misleading ads by Gephardt and Kerry supporters -- and asked the Lieberman rep if Joe raise that much. Lieberman's rep declined to respond.

Maybe that's the divisiveness Lieberman was talking about but from Hebron, CT's view point it was Lieberman and Kerry being the divisive ones.

Relatives there, farm country. Sounds like Dean country to me.

drop now, and stop looking like an idiot

he actually got a boost from the SH capture. That's rather bizarre.

as it is now, may never recover from the damage that is being done. The behavior of the Dean supporters at Democratic events is creating a deep divide in our local party. Good or bad..who knows. Perhaps our party needs to hit bottom before it will rise again.

From what I've seen, the divisiveness is aimed at Dean, not from Dean.

Uh huh...

Don't fall for it.

Dean has a tremendous grass roots organization. He's someone that me and a whole lot of other people believe in.

The only "damage being done" is to your delicate sensibilities.

True, the party isn't in such great shape. But compared to the past, it's seen worse. ;-)

Let's see, the candidate whom Joe and most of the other Dem candidates are constantly attacking, but whose own comments address the issues -- that candidate is the divisive one? Well, in Bushista America, words often seem to mean their opposites -- or at least are used that way.

in the house and senate, one might get the impression that Bu$h is a great unifier. :puke: Can you name one thing that he has wanted that he didn't get enough votes (including dems) to pass? Is it possible that Lieberman supports the republican agenda .. therefore he assumes a democrat that stands up for progressive ideals is 'divisive'?

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

nice, when Lieberman is gone. Nobody likes you Joe. Go Away.

All I can see is him doing damage to the other democrats and helping Bush. Schnieder gave him the political play of the week on Inside Politics. Lieberman is getting sympathy money from somewhere. Most likely the republicans and Rove's disinformation campaign. He should get out before he destroys all of our hopes for Dean or Clark or whoever. Oh divisive one.

Is this guy desperate or what!!!

Lieberman sucks.

:evilgrin:

He's not going to be the nominee. He's only trying to fracture the democratic party.

He and Zell Miller are loathesome creatures, wholey without scrupples.

If Dean is the demo nominee, which I think and hope that he is, and I think he has a strong chance of being our elected President.

Lieberman will just be a footnote in history.

Check out my lead article at the link below:

Bush, who you seem to agree with most of the time these days, is a divisive leader. If you can't see that, you don't belong in the democratic party.

I said I would support the Dem nominee if Dean isnt the one...but I can't in good conscience support this pathetic person.

I probably have a better chance of getting the nod than Lieberman. Watching Lieberman campaign. I feel that he is more concerned with getting himself elected than having a democrat in the white house.

And he's working at achieving that goal as hard as he can.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

what an ass, he's the one these days assaulting a fellow democratic hopeful. Just switch Joe, and do us all favor.

Joe Lieberman, the new kind of Democratic, The Republican Kind!

Second post in a row calling Joe L. a fucking hypocrite in the subject line, and they sit for 14 hours now without being deleted. I guess he's got the same status as Zell Miller now.

Bush Lite. And that's being NICE about it...

otherwise?

few besides some rupubs take you seriously.

Hey, Lieberman - we don't give a fuck about your Republican-lite babblings. You aren't likely to win the nom, since people can just vote for Bush if they want a guy like you.

In short, nice try, won't fly, good-bye.

Take the time to Grok "Grok" esp. #39 which isn't a title typo.

Which is interesting, in a way. Interesting in a car-crash of a post-mortem kinda way. Interesting since we've all been watching Lieberman get so much coverage bashing people post-Saddam. Equal time? Show Bush co. doing their little scripted victory dance, then you (you being the skewed media) show Lieberman bashing Dems. Been a week of that and I don't get Faux (thanks Time-Warner, the one thing you do right).

But this thread is here in some somewhat feeble attempt to smoke us out. There will be more. I suppose even bashing Lieberman will get him press. And that press will all come back to haunt us, probably in very spiffy tv ads.

There ought to be some password protected, qualified area of DU where we could bash Lieberman in peace. But what do I know, I'm new.... Meantime, however, I suspect we are doing some brainstorming for the Freeps or Rush, or somebody low on the food chain.

I enjoyed comparing him to Sen. Palapatine in an earlier thread (for the sci-fi hedz). An he has sunk to scumbag in my thought. But I think this divisiveness, Lieberman's, is really yet another fulcrum for general divisiveness--and talking points, soundbites.

So what? Well, as much as we can't stand the asshole, he will implode in a few short weeks. I think we ought to mail/email/fax our comments to Lieberman. Better, get somebody with some pull to muzzle the bastard already. But see, I'm saying too much already.

Alert was sent.

--Snazzy

We argue on everything else - a few even don't want W replaced- but we all dislike Joe. And yeah, he is Palpatine - I noticed the resemblance - and he does become the Emperor in the story just as Joe dreams in reality.

Whether for some repub strategic or distracting ends, or just fodder and noise, I know not. Really seems like Lieberman is on the same page--can't possibly win, but wants to disrupt/lash out at forerunners as much as possible. That bothers me more than OP's motives. The dark side.

Divide and conquer, right?

Edit--earlier, I sent a mod the thoughts I had here about #39. That's good enough.

Thought police. Oh well.

In which case apologies. Post gone now anyway--I'll edit my earlier. More than the mispelling that got me, but don't esspecially want to argue about it.

Update-editing period expired. So I'm stuck in my thought police shoes. So be it.

matching funds - the media can cover for his failed status only for so long. Out of all candidates, his belief that he can run for this office is the most extravagant. I do believe that he is the Rove Zell Miller in the Dem race. At the right moment, he'll lift his wig, reveal the drag and let the ugly republican be seen by all in a spectacular show...(yeah, there are a few people in Peoria who aren't in the secret)

Dean really does appear to be more divisive than Clark to me. Have a look at:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=9440

Is Dean as divisive as Bush when the scope changes to a national one in the general election? I don't think so. Bush is the world champ (and I do mean world champ) in divisiveness.

There are a million ways to achieve divisiveness. It is the default situation of mankind, IMO. Anyone can produce it easily, either intentionally or through incompetence. Bush/Rove Incorporated is the leading global franchise right now.

Will people change from a divisive cretin like Bush to a (possibly) angry "take it all back" centrist-liberal like Dean?

I think people want peace and unity.

or the appointed throwaway hatchetman from the DLC.

He has about 40% unfavorability ratings in the lead off states among DEMOCRATS.

Lieberman needs to go quietly into the night and leave the rest of us the hell alone.

and the rest of the damn Wall Street Democrats...

if you had any testicles...we wouldn't be where we are today.

I've had enough of the bullshit coming from the so-called "democrats" who think appeasing * is the way to go...

Working people have had enough...get it?

on edit: No very 700 clubish...but then I don't give a damn...:-)

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

:shrug:

In the 2000 Election, A LOT of Arab-Americans flocked to the repugz. *Maybe* for that very reason. Reducing our margin of REAL victory. Check it out..

http://www.zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=6578

Grok

No violence mind you, but...

:grr::nuke::mad:

I refuse to ever vote for Lieberman..

:eyes:

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

more than I can say for Joe.

about what Party he belonged to.