And the death penalty is stupid, as well as uncivilized.
Criminal gangs like the Bush Cartel use all kinds of thugs and operatives who are not nearly as guilty as the rich bastards who pay them, no matter what they've done. They may be conscienceless murderers or sadists, but the greater evil is that super-rich fascists would use these kinds of people to magnify their harm a thousand-fold--to accrue more money and power, to create a brutal, oppressive society in which millions suffer. Society certainly should protect itself from murderers and thugs. But, more than this, we need to root out the fascist war lords who give the orders--the people who own everything including our government; investigate them, convict them, and at the least take their power away, by strengthening our democratic process.
Whoever said--upthread--that Posada should be dropped out of an airplane--is crazy. That should not happen to him even if he is proven guilty of the things he is suspected of. That is simple revenge. It is low-minded and inhumane. And it is stupid. There are many Posadas. These are the lower echelon creators of mayhem. The enforcers. The thugs. And they may be the key to upper echelons of mayhem. And I would say the same of any terrorist. They have potentially great value to civilized society alive, and NO value dead. Personally, I believe that everyone--and I mean everyone--is redeemable. And they must be given the chance, in whatever their natural lifespan is, to redeem themselves. We may need to protect ourselves from them. But we should not kill them, no matter what they've done. My personal belief is that, when we do execute murderers, the evil comes back into the world, greatly enhanced. You simply CANNOT rid the world of evil by means of evil. But this aside--my fundamental, spiritual opposition to capital punishment--we are not talking here about an individual criminal. We are talking about a NETWORK of crime--and it may be a network of crime that has been poisoning our democracy for forty years. An operative of that criminal network is a potential gold mine of information that could unravel many puzzles, many crimes, and lead to the big criminals. We would be nuts to "try him and fry him" as some people seem to want. Nor do I believe in torture--which is an even worse magnifier of evil than capital punishment, and is equally counter-productive. We have to use humane means to find out what happened--what all he may have done, and for whom--and we may have to be very patient in that process. (Patience is the only way. Humane treatment is the ONLY way.) And then we have to follow those leads, if there are any.
One risk--if we stick to our ethical and legal principles--is that a man guilty of murder, and possibly mass murder, will walk free. Another risk is that those who gave him orders will kill him, to shut him up--whether he goes free, or is convicted and jailed. I think the best bet, for the usefulness of his life, to society, is to extradite him to Venezuela to be tried. He is wanted there, for the Cubana Airline bombing, in which over 70 Venezuelans were killed.
Our government--controlled by the Bush Junta--is either protecting him from that process (justice in Venezuela), or holding him in custody in order to kill him, if necessary. Or they could be intending to use him in some way--perhaps to throw blame off the main perps in a crime (or crimes) that they fear will be disclosed. It's very odd that he would get the money to escape jail in Venezuela and enter the U.S., and then be held up on an immigration charge. He was a CIA ASSET. Why did they not intervene? And if they didn't want him in this country, why did he get as far as he did--and then get stopped? POSSIBLY it is a case of honest law enforcement in one jurisdiction holding him up--that is, that the plan was to get him here as a free agent, and into luxury digs in Miami, and somebody along the way said, "Whoa, I'm not going along with this," and found a minor offense on which to hold him. And the criminals behind him don't quite know what to do about it. Meanwhile, it's become known who he is and where he is. So those who would either protect him, or want to control/eliminate him, are faced with a dilemma--a snag in the system that puts a spotlight on whatever they do.
The Bush Junta has shown every sign of being a criminal enterprise, and some of its members have connection back to past crimes in Latin America (I'm thinking of Negroponte and Bolton, and others). Also, ESPECIALLY given this US Attorney scandal--the poisoning of our justice system with political operatives and motives--and given the purging of our intelligence agencies, and the rise of toadies and yes men--we can have no trust at all that the Posada case is being handled properly, or will be in the future. There are too many possible motives for mishandling, one way or the other (--to let him off scot free, to applause in Miami; to keep him in custody for possible elimination; to use him somehow to cover up criminal trails, etc.). There are too many people and agencies who would have personal or institutional reasons for skewing justice--and/or preventing further investigation. And these many possible people, agencies and powers are not necessarily restricted to the Bush Junta. There are dirty Democrats as well.
So, since we can't trust our political system or our justice system--or our "secret government"--the best solution is to remand him to Venezuela, where at least they have honest elections and an administration that was demonstrably chosen by 63% of the voters. We can have no confidence in the motives of our own government. The Venezuelan prosecutor, who was investigating the violent military coup attempt in 2002, was blown to high heaven with a car bomb--and there is much reason to suspect our own government of at least supporting that crime, if not committing it--and to suspect them of participation in many operations against Chavez, including the recently disclosed plot to assassinate Chavez, that was in progress in Colombia, until it was brought to light in the rightwing paramilitary scandals there. Operatives of the Bush Junta are possible conspirators in this plotted mayhem. The Bushites poured billions of dollars into the Colombian military, whose CHIEF now stands accused of colluding with the rightwing drug traffickers, murderers and plotters. And their object was overthrow of a democracy--and, I have recently learned, possibly several democracies, the ones that sit on oil reserves (Bolivia, Ecuador). So the Venezuelans also can have no confidence in our government to handle this terrorism case--Posada--properly. And they haven't handled it properly so far. In their unreasonable hostility to Venezuela--and probably their fear of what a trial of Posada in Venezuela might uncover--they have failed to respond to the extradition request.
The policy of the Democratic Party should be to grant extradition. Posada is a Venezuelan citizen, accused of a grave crime against Venezuelans. That is where he rightfully belongs. It's time we ended the policy of permitting rightwing thugs to find refuge in the United States. If he was a law-abiding asset of the CIA, that is one thing. We might owe him protection. (We may not like spying, but all governments do it, and always have, and if it's merely spying--gathering information--we shouldn't cast such agents or contacts to the wind--as the Bush Junta did with the outing of the Plame/Brewster-Jennings WMD counter-proliferation network--in that case, a deliberately destructive and treasonous act.) But the evidence strongly points to Posada's involvement in unlawful activity, in violation of many of our own laws, as well as international law--and if we are not going to be straight about this, and investigate, and let the chips fall where they may--then the least we should do, as a responsible member of international community, is grant Venezuela's request.
-----------------
"Some of the first countries to abolish capital punishment included Venezuela (1863), San Marino (1865), and Costa Rica (1877). "
http://www.newsbatch.com/deathpenalty.htm