Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice official is expected to help U.S. attorney's office (in Minnesota)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 10:43 PM
Original message
Justice official is expected to help U.S. attorney's office (in Minnesota)
Source: Star Tribune

By PAUL McENROE, DAN BROWNING and PAM LOUWAGIE
Star Tribune staff writers
Last update: April 06, 2007 – 9:48 PM

A Justice Department official in Washington is expected to return to Minneapolis next week to help run the U.S. attorney's office in Minnesota, according to an attorney with knowledge of an upheaval that led three lawyers to quit their management jobs Thursday.

The official, John Kelly, the chief of staff and a deputy director in the U.S. attorney's executive office in Washington, may wind up being tapped to be the first assistant to U.S. Attorney Rachel Paulose in Minneapolis, the attorney said Friday. ~snip~

Kelly first came to Minneapolis at Paulose's request to try to bridge the divide between Paulose and her top assistants, said the attorney, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for job protection. But they resigned later that day to return to prosecuting cases full time.

"She had briefed him that there was an uprising," the attorney said. Initially, Kelly was scheduled to have short interviews with the attorneys but the meetings went nearly two hours, the attorney said. ~snip~



Read more: http://www.startribune.com/462/story/1105981.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Disagreement is treated as disloyalty," the attorney said.
Edited on Fri Apr-06-07 10:51 PM by Nevernose
Kind of sums up the entire Bush philosophy, doesn't it?

Former Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Sandy Keith warned Paulose at the ceremony that she would come under criticism because she is a woman "and you're too young." But Keith added, "I know you'll surround yourself with outstanding and experienced people to help you carry out these duties."

Outstanding and experienced people like the ones who just quit?

Sometimes people are just jerks. It doesn't matter what the age, race, sex, etc. of the person is: a jerk is a jerk.

And if someone IS upset by a person's younger age, then that's all the more reason to defer to them. Not only do they have more experience, but simple courtesy demands it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. younger age? She was a Bushie pushing her religion on other people.
right-wing hard line Christian, putting god into the attorney';s office, till noone could stand working there any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I was too impersonal in my pronouns - Sorry
Edited on Sat Apr-07-07 12:30 AM by Nevernose
I've heard the same accusation, and agree with you.

I said And if someone IS upset by a person's younger age, then that's all the more reason to defer to them. Not only do they have more experience, but simple courtesy demands it.

When I said, "defer to them," I meant "the boss should defer to her employees." The young one, the Pat Robertson-quoting one, should be the deferential one. She should, by simple courtesy (if not plain-old commonsense), defer to the more experienced attorneys on the job.

It's the sign of a good boss as opposed to a megalomaniacal one; someone who wants to know the best way of doing something as opposed to already "knowing" the best way.

On edit: my age comments came from the original link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. got it. I misunderstood what you were saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. they need to get rid of her nepotistic fascist arrogant ass and put
everyone back. i want everything back, damn it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I'd settle for putting things back to 1972
At this point, Bush makes Nixon look pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. U.S. Attorney Rachel Paulose in Minneapolis should be fired if she's
that ineffective at being a 'boss'. This situation sounded untenable for the 3 people that preferred to take a different job (at lower pay) rather than work with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like Bush and Co. at work.
I am sure I can not figure out where they get these so called college Republicans that seem to be so lost in the Middle Ages to work for them. Didn't someone write a book about the closing Am. mind? Well we have seen it first hand since Bush and Co. got in. All these people seem to be just a like and they are in every agency of the govt. now, Nothing runs well any more. All one needs to do is open the paper each day to see more mess they have made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. "uprising" ... so they are considered "insurgents"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like the ultimate "boss from hell." ... A definite Medal of Freedom candidate!
Edited on Fri Apr-06-07 11:33 PM by Bozita
How would you like to show up at work on Monday and find her in charge?

Just another of The Decider's decisions gone awry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. She was Gonzales's first aide ever.
She is a major player.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. Her are her priorities-------and the cases that get left behind:

......But Dunne told Paulose he couldn't abide by the request, one of the attorneys said, and when he refused, Dunne was forced to give up his position as chief of the narcotics section. Dunne would not comment Friday.

Another attorney, who has knowledge of office operations, said Dunne and several others stepped down because of the way Paulose treated them. "It gets to the point where you can't manage in that environment," said the attorney, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Paulose has clearly defined her prosecution priorities: guns, child porn, immigration enforcement, public corruption and methamphetamine trafficking.

As a result, some enforcement programs have been scaled back, one attorney said. Among them: going after landlords who have not removed lead paint from their properties, easing up on enforcement of laws protecting people with disabilities and health care, that source said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. Interesting glimpse into yet another fact
that bush & co uses DOJ cases for propaganda and photo ops.

The "rift" in one it says was about a narcotics case - set op for gonzo or his top people to give maybe a press conference. One of the resigned attorneys did not want to claim it do be something it was not.
He did not want to lie - I applaud him.

....high-ranking Justice Department officials who would be coming to Minneapolis from Washington to highlight the office's high-profile cases, the attorneys said.

Paulose instructed the head of the narcotics section, Andy Dunne, to state in the memo that prosecutors had won convictions that ended drug dealing by St. Paul's Latin Kings gang, they said. emphasis mine

and this is not merely a dispute of policy - this sounds like an attempt to coerce someone to lie:

But Dunne told Paulose he couldn't abide by the request, one of the attorneys said, and when he refused, Dunne was forced to give up his position as chief of the narcotics section. Dunne would not comment Friday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. So Kelly's job is to babysit this bushie from hell?
Even though he's to be "her first assistant".. .
Kind of like Cheney was supposed to keep Jr. from going off the tracks, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC