Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge rejects Padilla torture argument

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 08:24 AM
Original message
Judge rejects Padilla torture argument
Source: Associated Press

A federal judge rejected a motion by alleged al-Qaida operative Jose Padilla to dismiss terrorism charges against him over claims he was tortured in U.S. military custody. The ruling removes one of the last major obstacles to the start of Padilla's trial next week.

U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke stressed in a 12-page order filed late Monday that she was not passing judgment on the torture allegations. Rather, she said the effort to dismiss the case for "outrageous government conduct" was faulty on legal grounds.

Padilla's lawyers claim that during the 3 1/2 years Padilla was held as an "enemy combatant" at a Navy brig he was routinely subjected to harsh treatment and torture.

He claimed that he was forced to stand in painful stress positions, given LSD or some other drug as a "truth serum," subjected to loud noises and noxious odors, and forced to endure sleep deprivation, extreme heat and cold and harsh lights.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070410/ap_on_re_us/padilla_terror_charges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. So the question is: How did Marcia get her job?
Because, unfortunately, we have to ask that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well
it looks like she got high marks from Sen. Hatch... go figure.

http://judiciary.senate.gov/print_member_statement.cfm?id=1090&wit_id=2628
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. This case is not too tainted for Judge Cooke as long as
Edited on Tue Apr-10-07 08:41 AM by Eugene
the government does not directly use "evidence"
it obtained while breaking Padilla in court.

What the hell happened to this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. She would do well in the Third Reich
Hitler had courts and Judges similar to this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I doubt it considering she's black.
She's still a Bushite though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Interesting
I was referring to her politics not her race

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Yes I know.
I'm just saying, I don't think she'd be welcome in the Third Reich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I suspect if they had any real evidence he would have gone to court years ago.
Remember he was first picked up on the accusation he was going to set off a "dirty bomb". That was dropped years ago and he has been held without charges for years against the US Constitution. The Constitution was written specifically to protect people from exactly this sort of thing. It has been blatantly violated and no one seems to give a dman..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. One Nation, Under PNAC, with murder, torture and war for the aggrandizement of PNAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. this is shameful-
even the prosecution admits that Padillia has been forever damaged by what was done to him

i am so disgusted and ashamed of what has been done in 'our' name, with our money, by our fellow citizens.

:nuke:

blu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Judicial, if not a judicious decision
It sounds as though Judge Cooke is waiting to see what evidence is introduced and developed before ruling on whether it will be admissible. Under ordinary circumstances, I would tend to agree with her ruling, because it's the judge's job to conduct the trial fairly, and not allow one side or the other to "pre-interpret" the evidence the other side is going to present (but hasn't yet presented).

These, however, are hardly ordinary circumstances, and I don't think any judge would be reviled for viewing any evidence submitted by the government in this case with a great deal of skepticism. I think Judge Cooke is being overcautious here. But the issue is clearly not settled, and the defense will have a chance to renew its arguments after the government puts on its evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Toture is as American as apple pie (with apologies to
H. Rap Brown)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. "faulty on legal grounds" ??? !!!
how about a judge that ISN'T a bush toady? holy FUCK, these continued ruling are a complete travishamockery!

"In her ruling, Cooke said the dismissal motion wasn't backed up by case law and failed on legal grounds because prosecutors aren't using any evidence collected during Padilla's time in the brig.

To rule otherwise would "effectively provide a defendant with amnesty for any uncharged crime so long as the government violated the defendant's due process rights at some prior point," she wrote."


- ok, that is simply madness. a loophole allowing torture? only in BushAmerika.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Um, haven't defendants gotten off lots because due process was violated?
Maybe it's not an automatic acquittal. In fact it probably is not. But the ruling seems to paint with an overly broad brush here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. In order to reclaim a modern humane system of justice based on basic
fairness agreed upon by the civilized countries of the world, our courts need some purging and the constitution needs to be pushed back into focus (with the treaties we have agreed to as law).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afghan_Vet Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Agreed. . .
We do need to remember that treaties are to be considered as law, even according to the UCMJ. To violate treaties on the conduct of prisoners, to try to justify that conduct by suggesting a new definition of "enemy combatant", then to attempt to pass legislation to provide themselves amnesty from prosecution for war crimes is an egregious assault on human rights and civil liberties, the ideal of justice, and the very fabric of equality our Democracy was founded upon. BushCo are the greatest threats to the Constitution, our liberties, and world peace. They are the greatest terrorists in the world today!

Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.
~George Washington

Some men...in order to prevent the supposed intentions of their adversaries, have committed the most enormous cruelties...
~Clearchus, in Xenophon

The worst crimes were dared by a few, willed by more and tolerated by all.
~Tacitus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Very well said & welcome to DU! I see you like quotes as well...
here are a couple that I think are also appropriate:
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you." - Nietzsche

"To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture." - Thomas Paine

BTW - If you haven't discovered www.antiwar.com I think you might find it interesting. As someone who likes quotes they have quite a collection of antiwar ones.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsisDawn Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. So the British Soldiers lied to avoid the remote possibility
of torture by Iran. We actually torture people and our government says that is how we get them to tell the truth...hmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. "outrageous government conduct" ..what a nice way of saying war crimes
Edited on Tue Apr-10-07 02:56 PM by Solly Mack
Gee, how good America looks to be so polite and politic about such things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Does this set a precedent?
Will torture be permitted in non-terrorist trials as well? Perhaps witch dunking and trial by combat will make a comeback too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. this is a jury trial, right?
Edited on Tue Apr-10-07 05:54 PM by maxsolomon
i hope jose gets a Scooter Libby jury, not an OJ jury. the future of habeas corpus depends on a jury spanking the feds for violating every last one of this citizens' rights.

and, if i was his lawyer, i'd sure as fuck put him on the stand & ask him about his treatment. she's not ruling out introducing his torture in the trial phase, is she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarmaKaize Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. If the Judge was tortured, he'd change his opinion...
On the other hand, those robes are really useful when you shit your pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC