Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice Resists Testimony to House Panel on Niger Claim

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 04:42 AM
Original message
Rice Resists Testimony to House Panel on Niger Claim
Source: Bloomberg




Rice Resists Testimony to House Panel on Niger Claim

Janine Zacharia Tue Apr 17, 7:43 PM ET

April 17 (Bloomberg) -- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is resisting a U.S. House panel's demand that she testify tomorrow on why President George W. Bush said in a 2003 speech that Iraq sought uranium from Africa.

............

Waxman, in a letter to the State Department released late today, wrote that he has ``postponed the scheduled vote for a subpoena for your appearance before the committee from tomorrow to April 25.''

``I hope we can use this time to schedule your voluntary appearance,'' he wrote.

.........

..........The panel's top Republican, Representative Tom Davis, said ``it seems clear to us that Secretary Rice has answered the questions Chairman Waxman posed.''

``We're left wondering what a subpoena would accomplish, other than more crass headline grabbing,'' said Davis.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20070417/pl_bloomberg/ajyo_13eqhwg;_ylt=AsxDJIiHS5k5wGdX.DdeM9XMWM0F
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rhetorical question...
WTF is wrong with these people? Don't the understand they work for US? :banghead:

Jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They don't work for you and me...
Even though we pay their salary, they are in office to do the work for the wealthy and their right wing neocon constituents.

When they refuse to testify, it just incriminates them in the minds of many, even some of the stupid will see through their attempts to thwart justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Bush, Cheney, Rice and the rest of the BushCo cabal work for
...a small group of wealthy people whose interest is protecting their power base and making as much money as they possibly can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. we are little peas under their mattraces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Man, is Henry just jerking her chain now? That would be too funny. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I have to suspect Condi is shitting in her panties. She is not that dumb to notice Humpty has Fallen
and the pieces are fucked.....

She gatta have the "Worries"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. And all Georgie's horses and all Georgie's men
Edited on Wed Apr-18-07 03:20 PM by kgfnally
stood there and giggled again and again...


I hate these people, I really do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. things have changed condi -- or haven't you noticed?
the surge isn't going well -- america is sick of your boss -- he has fucked new orleans -- fucked new york and fucked america -- get with the program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Agreed
It seems that we don't see Condi in the news cycle much. Bob Gates (who we may or may not agree with on issues, but can at least find his plate with his fork) Sec of Defense, but Condi seems to have slipped off the radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. i genuinely hope she is having a bad time these days.
for my money -- condi is way more than a water carrier for bushco -- i think she is right in the thick of their strategy, pnac, and everything else.

may she be very, very uncomfortable now and always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. as Pelosi says--------There is a new Congress in town
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Their letter was totally obnoxious
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x685130

I'm not sure what to really call it but I never thought OUR State Dept would descend into poopiness.

POOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. It's all poop. read my tag line. :)nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. LOL - Best laugh I'm prolly gonna have all day!
(hint: after you go to the link, read the 'comments' before you read the whole letter...)

Thanks for posting this, otherwise I woulda missed it. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. Why is it always "DR Rice?" To give her status? I don't get it.
Edited on Wed Apr-18-07 10:16 AM by caledesi
I hardly remember Madeline Albright being called DOCTOR..even though she has a PHD, and can actually speak, read and write Russian (unlike Condi) among other languages including Czech.

These thugs are so transparent!

Read Madam Secretary by Albright. - a brilliant lady!

edit: usual stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. Big Bad Wolf
Little Red Riding Hood is skipping thru the forest road when she sees the big bad wolf crouched down behind a log.

"My, what big eyes you have, Mr.. Wolf."

The wolf jumps up and runs away.

Further down the road Little Red Riding Hood sees the wolf again and this time he is crouched behind a bush.

"My what big ears you have, Mr.. Wolf."

Again the wolf jumps up and runs away.

About 1/4 mile down the road Little Red Riding Hood sees the wolf again and this time he is crouched down behind a rock.

"My what big teeth you have Mr.. Wolf."

With that the wolf jumps up and screams, "Will you knock it off, I'm trying to poop!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Elections have consequences, Ms. Secretary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think a cabinet officer can refuse to testify to congress.
At least not by tradition. The claim of executive privilege does not extend to these positions. This is getting odder and odder by the day. Will subpoena's to cabinet officers be ignored? What then? I think they (the cabal) will lose this in court, but they could then choose to ignore the courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Bushwad slept through that part of his government classes
He was only awake during the King George III and before the Revolutionary War
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. When the court is them they can't lose.
The criminals have wormed their way into every single branch and department of government. Criminals are in complete control and they will not be held accountable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Is National Security Advisor a Cabinet post? I don't think so.
That was the post she held during the yellowcake debacle.

Still, she should answer the questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Her position now is Secretary of State and she can't legally ignore Congress
The White House has gotten away with illegally ignoring requests from congressmen up until the time the new Congress was sworn in this past January. Before then, the Republican-controlled Congress allowed the White House to break the law. This new Democratic Congress will not allow that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. They can still demand that she testify as a cabinet officer.
I really do not think there is a precedent for refusing to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. no, but delays are in their tactic---After Memorial Day recess now (if then)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. Actual oversight and follow-through
I wonder why Rep. Davis hates our system of government so much that he would label a legitimate congressional function "crass headline grabbing"? I'd also like to hear from Mr. Davis why his party just let the administration skate on its bogus claims for four years? Was the graft and the corruption so good that you could ignore the bodies of American soldiers hitting the ground, Mr. Davis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. They should have had all this stuff scheduled for May 1.
MAYDAY! MAYDAY! MAYDAY!

SS Bushco going down!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. What can legally be done with these people?
If they refuse to appear when subpeonaed? If we actually have another election and they just refuse to leave? He has what he's gutted from our treasury in his pocket and he has paid mercenaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Can we cuff them for failure to appear?
These bastages don't have diplomatic immunity that I'm aware of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. That is what I wonder also
Since the Justice system belongs to the RNC, there isn't a chance in hell we will be able to charge these Bushies with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
18. Got things to hide, rice?
Rightwingnuts; dirty corrupt MFers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. As Republics are wont to say
If Dr. Rice has nothing to hide, she should not fear putting her hand on the Bible and swearing to tell the truth, the whole truth & nothing but the truth.

If she's not guilty, Dr. Rice certainly wouldn't have to resort to hiding behind executive privilege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
20. Tom Davis
Edited on Wed Apr-18-07 08:51 AM by The Wizard
really needs to get off the sauce for a while. He sounds as crazy as Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. She would be violating her Loyalty Oath to the Fuhrer.
I wonder how many in Congress have taken it as well?

Die Vereidigung der Wehrmacht auf Adolf Hitler, 2.8.1934

"Ich schwöre bei Gott diesen heiligen Eid, daß ich dem Führer des Deutschen Reiches und Volkes Adolf Hitler, dem Oberbefehlshaber der Wehrmacht, unbedingten Gehorsam leisten und als tapferer Soldat bereit sein will, jederzeit für diesen Eid mein Leben einzusetzen."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
22. (said with a bellly laugh)I'll bet she does
:rofl:

Question 1-Can you explain how you and the entire executive branch told a lie to get us into a war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
25. "..your VOLUNTARY appearance,"
Wax is sending her a very clear message.

"We can do this the easy way, or the hard way." IE - S U B P O E N A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
36. Fact: the known fake Niger docs used in the lies that were told to invade Iraq
came into the Decider's "failed intelligence" network from sources inside Italy.

Fact: Mel Sembler was the BFEE Ambassador to Italy during that time frame.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x548152#562738

Fact: Valerie Plame Wilson was involved in tracking and preventing the proliferation of real WMD's and a lot of people died as a result of her covert CIA status being revealed-which is a most serious crime.

So, what is Mel Sembler doing today besides raising funds for RNC and Lieberman-why was Sam Fox made a recess appointed BFEE Ambassador to Belgium?

Fact, we have all been betrayed by this criminally installed administration of traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
37. Chairman Waxman Postpones Vote and Renews Request for Rice Testimony
~snip~
April 17, 2007

The Honorable Condoleezza Rice
Secretary
Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520

Dear Madam Secretary:

I appreciate the effort devoted to the April 17, 2007, letter to me from Jeffrey T. Bergner, Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Legislative Affairs at the Department of State. As a result of this letter, I have postponed the scheduled vote for a subpoena for your appearance before the Committee from tomorrow to April 25. I hope we can use this time to schedule your voluntary appearance before the Committee prior to the Memorial Day recess.

The reason your testimony remains essential is because Mr. Bergner's letter does not answer the Committee's questions about your personal knowledge of, your personal role in, and your personal statements about the claim that Iraq sought to import uranium from Niger.

One of the Committee's central questions is what you personally know about how the fabricated claim that Iraq sought uranium from Niger made it into the President's State of the Union address, the most heavily vetted speech given by any public official. Mr. Bergner's letter says that "Steve Hadley and Dan Bartlett held a press briefing to explain in great detail how the speech had been developed." Providing the Committee with the views of Mr. Hadley and Mr. Bartlett is not the same as providing the Committee with your personal knowledge.

A second important question is whether you knew about the doubts raised by the CIA and the State Department about the Niger claim prior to its inclusion in the State of the Union address and your New York Times op-ed. Mr. Bergner's letter refers the Committee to an old press interview in which you said you either did not see or did not remember a CIA memo to you that raised doubts about the Niger claim. Of course, this does not answer whether you had conversations with Mr. Hadley, Mr. Tenet, or others about the Niger claim. It also does not answer whether you were aware of the prominent warning in the "Key Judgments" section of the National Intelligence Estimate that the State Department had an "alternative view" about the evidence that Iraq was actively pursuing nuclear weapons.

Nor does Mr. Bergner's letter answer the Committee's questions about what kind of investigation you conducted before appearing on national television in June 2003 and erroneously asserted that "no one ... in our circles" knew about the problems with the Niger claim.

Mr. Bergner's letter is mainly a collection of snippets of public statements that you and other White House officials have made over the years about the fabricated Niger claim. The full record of your public statements on this issue, however, is confusing and contradictory. You stated repeatedly on national television in June 2003 that no one at the White House was informed about the intelligence community's doubts about the Niger claim prior to the President's State of the Union address. Subsequent disclosures have shown this to be erroneous. I hope you can understand that the Committee cannot accept a selective compilation of your past public statements as responsive to the Committee's request.

At several points, Mr. Bergner's letter makes references to prior investigations into the Niger claim. These references, however, do not answer the questions raised in my letters for a simple reason: the reports cited by Mr. Bergner did not examine how White House officials like you used the intelligence on Iraq.

Mr. Bergner's letter also fails to answer other questions raised in my correspondence with you, including questions about the seemingly inconsistent White House responses to security breaches and the selection of delegates to international conferences.

At this point, further exchanges of letters may not be helpful. I hope we can work together over the next week to schedule a voluntary appearance by you before the Committee. This would eliminate the need for the use of any compulsory process by the Committee and, I believe, best serve the public interest.

Sincerely,

Henry A. Waxman
Chairman

cc: Tom Davis
Ranking Minority Member
~snip~
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/alerts/224
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
38. Its about time
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC