Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzales Denies Picking of Attorneys for Dismissal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 01:16 PM
Original message
Gonzales Denies Picking of Attorneys for Dismissal
Source: hispanicbusiness.com

April 18, 2007
David Johnston and Neil A. Lewis -- The New York Times Media Group
Advertisement

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales offered a measured apology for his mistakes in the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys, but said in testimony prepared for a Senate hearing on Tuesday that none of the prosecutors were removed to influence the outcome of a case.
---

Gonzales is certain to be asked about his own recollection of events. He has said he does not recall a Nov. 27, 2006, meeting in which the dismissals were discussed. Michael Battle, the former director of the department's U.S. Attorney liaison office, has told congressional staff members that Gonzales was at the meeting when a memo was circulated that provided a detailed outline of the plan to dismiss the prosecutors.
---

Gonzales's prepared statement did not address several significant issues cited by Democrats who have charged that the firings were politically motivated. Two of the fired prosecutors, David Iglesias of New Mexico and John McKay of Washington State, were fired after Republican officials complained to the Justice Department. In Iglesias' case, Senator Pete Domenici, Republican of New Mexico, complained to the White House about the prosecutor's lack of progress on a politically sensitive case involving Democrats.

Read more: http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?id=61961&cat=Politics+News&more=%2Fpolitics%2F



Grilled Gonzo, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. his positions are like a bloody coin toss.
I can't keep it straight any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. let's see what little wayne newton sez tomorrow morning...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Has anyone ever said whose idea it was to replace the USAs?
I understand that the President appoints them, but if they serve at the pleasure of the President, why does someone else get to fire them? And how can they be fired without the President, or at least the Attorney General, being involved or have knowledge of those firings? None of this affair makes any sense to me at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. well, since lots made of how they serve at Bush Pleasure, then Bush dismissed them. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. EXCELLENT point!
:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. "none of the prosecutors were removed to influence the outcome of a case"
Slick Gonzo may not be lying there, but the prosecutors were removed because of cases they already prosecuted and closed , or cases they refused to prosecute. None of those were ongoing, so could not be influenced. Clever Gonzo, clever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. the investigation into Cunningham, Wilkes, Foggo was pending--does investigation not equal case??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. What you gonna believe?
Reality or me?

Gonzo testimony!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Me, or Your Lying Eyes?
Edited on Wed Apr-18-07 03:20 PM by Demeter
Don't these Bushbots have even the faintest sense of propriety, or did they think they could keep EVERYTHING they ever did, no matter how public a matter, secret forever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC