Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon restricting testimony in Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tracer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 08:00 AM
Original message
Pentagon restricting testimony in Congress
Source: Boston Globe

Blocks staff of lower rank/
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff  |  May 10, 2007

WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon has placed unprecedented restrictions on who can testify before Congress, reserving the right to bar lower-ranking officers, enlisted soldiers, and career bureaucrats from appearing before oversight committees or having their remarks transcribed, according to Defense Department documents.

Robert L. Wilkie , a former Bush administration national security official who left the White House to become assistant secretary of defense for legislative affairs last year, has outlined a half-dozen guidelines that prohibit most officers below the rank of colonel from appearing in hearings, restricting testimony to high-ranking officers and civilians appointed by President Bush.

The guidelines, described in an April 19 memo to the staff director of the House Armed Services Committee, adds that all field-level officers and enlisted personnel must be "deemed appropriate" by the Department of Defense before they can participate in personal briefings for members of Congress or their staffs; in addition, according to the memo, the proceedings must not be recorded.

Read more: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/05/10/pentagon_restricting_testimony_in_congress/



-----------------

Another * crony making up the rules as he goes along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hate the smell of COVER-UP in the morning...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Since when are we a military dictatorship?
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. not long ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why does this smell "pre-emptive" to me?
I think the dog shit on the lawn, after being covered by snow and frozen all winter might be thawing out soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Smell test.
This fits right in with 'Unitary Executive.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I think you mean "Urinary Executive." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Adjunct to the 'Trickle Down Theory'
Sometimes, I wish I had an umbrella.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-12-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. He did pick out a yellow pissy rug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, let's fry the Colonels and Generals who've fostered torture. Sounds good to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You are close to the mark, but off some ranks
Generals and the Civilian Leadership always make sure there are plenty of lower ranks between them and any actually crime, thus to get the Secretary of Defense you have to start by going after some Sargent first and then work up the chain of Command.

By restricting Enlisted personnel and Company and Field Grade Officers from testifying AND THE NEVER HAVING THE TESTIMONY RECORDED, You can NOT connect the dots from Abu Ghraib to Bush. You have a whole section of dots MISSING (Senior enlisted personnel along with Company and Field Grade Officers).

Furthermore, like Vietnam, Iraq has become a Platoon Level war. The Tactical operations are rarely more than Company movements against the Iraqis. Thus the best people to tell you how things are going are such Enlisted Personal performing such operations, the Company Grade officers leading or directing such operations and the Field Grade officers trying to coordinate these operations. All the Generals can do is make sure the men have supplies and support (Artillery or Air) as needed and kiss the Secretary of Defense Ass for a promotion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. k & r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ha! Good luck with that!
I'm sure a Senator will be so concerned about violating that policy if he or she wants to hear from a servicemember under the rank of Colonel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. how can such 'guidelines' possibly be legal? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. How can they do this? Can they get away with it?
I would think Congress could interview ANYone they wanted -- no? The question is, will Congress flex its muscles or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC