Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Administration Rejects Democratic Forest Bills

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 05:28 PM
Original message
Bush Administration Rejects Democratic Forest Bills
WASHINGTON (Reuters)


The Bush administration on Tuesday criticized Senate Democrats' legislation that would direct most forest thinning to be conducted near communities at risk of wildfires rather than giving local foresters the flexibility determine where such work should be carried out.

Democrats have complained that a Republican measure passed in the House in May stripped out environmental safeguards and public participation.

They countered with two bills, including one by Democrats Tom Daschle of South Dakota and Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico, that would direct 70 percent of funding to fire-prone areas near communities and where water supplies could be threatened. ---

A major hurdle for the Senate passing their forest bill could be judicial review, Democrats and Republicans admit.

Federal courts would need to balance the environmental consequences of thinning with those of inaction, and have to renew preliminary injunctions against thinning projects every 45 days under the Republican measure.

Democrats would require judges to defer to the Forest Service and other government agencies before they determine that failing to thin would have a more significant long-term impact on forest health than not thinning.

Ride Don’t Drive It’s Global Cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, there's a surprise . . .
NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lkinsale Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. That burns me up!
Well, ok. Puns aside, the Bingaman bill is an excellent environmental approach to getting the forests back in shape. It's got heavy support here in fire-prone, environmentally-conscious New Mexico.

The issue is, given limited money, do the forests get "thinned" by timber companies where they prefer, or do they get "thinned" where the health of the forests and the fire hazards matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I AM SPARTACUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think that the answer, if left to the timber companies, is rather
evident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LauraK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush needs to butt out.
We don't have the money for this and he doesn't either.

Every time there's a new president, there's a new plan and our forests are a mess. The President's proposal would waive the National Environmental Policy Act -- the very foundation of environmental protections developed to curb the damage caused by the ever changing federal policies.

The Western Governors' Association (all members including The National Association of Counties ) in colaboration with federal agencies, timber industry, cattlemen and conservation and community leaders, worked together over the last year to formulate a consensus plan that would reduce wildfire risk to communities and the environment. In May of this year, this process resulted in a specific implementation plan to address wildland fire and hazardous fuels risks as well as the need for habitat restoration in a truly collaborative effort that involved citizens and governments at all levels. Significantly, all parties agreed that these goals could be achieved without any change to existing law.

Bush's Secretary of Interior Gale Norton was in full compliance with The Western Governors' Association on the 10-year strategy until bush came along for a photo-op.

I am very good friends with a number of trees in the Willamette Forest and they told me to tell him to go sit on a sharp stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. perhaps
that's one of the reasons that gail norton resigned from her position. is it just me, or has EVERYTHING that the dems supported been vetoed by the smirking chimp??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Then Bush gets Dixie Boy Zell Miller to support him and...
claims to be a bi-partisan compromising moderate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Don't fergit Breaux.
He's got two "bi-partisans."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC