Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oil industry scales back refinery plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 06:39 PM
Original message
Oil industry scales back refinery plans
Source: ap



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070617/ap_on_bi_ge/ethanol_refineries;_ylt=AhoqxpbuGP3SjUTbC6G_mzGs0NUE


Oil industry scales back refinery plans

By H. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer 30 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - A push from Congress and the White House for huge increases in biofuels, such as ethanol, is prompting the oil industry to scale back its plans for refinery expansions. That could keep gasoline prices high, possibly for years to come.



With President Bush calling for a 20 percent drop in gasoline use and the Senate now debating legislation for huge increases in ethanol production, oil companies see growing uncertainty about future gasoline demand and little need to expand refineries or build new ones.

Oil industry executives no longer believe there will be the demand for gasoline over the next decade to warrant the billions of dollars in refinery expansions — as much as 10 percent increase in new refining capacity — they anticipated as recently as a year ago.

Biofuels such as ethanol and efforts to get automakers to build more fuel-efficient cars and SUVs have been portrayed as key to countering high gasoline prices, but it is likely to do little to curb costs at the pump today, or in the years ahead as refiners reduce gasoline production.

A shortage of refineries frequently has been blamed by politicians for the sharp price spikes in gasoline, as was the case last week by Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., during debate on a Senate energy bill.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070617/ap_on_bi_ge/ethanol_refineries;_ylt=AhoqxpbuGP3SjUTbC6G_mzGs0NUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it time to nationalize the energy industries before the oil and energy..........
robber barons bankrupt our country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Seconded.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. How excellent for oil corps.! More profits.
Oil dependence high + demand high + supplies less + prices higher= profits higher

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, let's see.
Gas prices are (supposedly) high because there is not enough refinery capacity to keep up with demand.

Oil companies aren't going to build any new refineries because there isn't enough demand to justify building them.

That's just a fucked up argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. And to think back in the early 90s they bought up and shut down
perfectly good refineries that could probably be restarted with a bit of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Not w/o breaking environmental laws
And, as we all know perfectly well, environmentalists are the cause of all the problems -- not the inherent greed of multinational corporations, or people just interested in making a quick buck -- but people who seem to think that regulating refineries are the issue. People who think that that we can breathe and live and raise our children in at least a semi-healthy world, and do so without a large difference in the quality of life we lead. Damned tree-huggers! :crazy:

:sigh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. It is the argument of a monopoly
Or oligopoly if you prefer. Maybe that should be oiligopy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. So they can give themselves billions of dollars in bonuses instead
They will claim that the consumption of gasoline will go down, so they won't increase refinery capacity, then work like hell to make sure consumption goes up so the market drives the prices up.

And what have they been doing with their record profits for the past few years, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Time to mandate refinery capacity
There is no incentive for oil companies to do what is right for the economy and the country. Time to do it for em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Agreed. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oil industry executives .. that used to be "Trust"
and anti-trust laws stopped all negotiating from happening between competing firms, but, that's soooo pre-911
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. They are speeding the development of alternatives
Short term pain, long term gain - for us.

They are a nasty lot, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. I can almost understand the oil companies reluctance
Seeing as how peak oil is just around the corner, and they'll have more refining capacity than oil supplies. They'd never recoup their costs before the oil is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kick, because this really pisses me off!
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 02:06 AM by Up2Late
:kick:

Edit: Oh, you want to really get pissed off? Listen to these reports on the U.S. Auto Industry from today!

(Correct me if I'm wrong but, Isn't this the definition of a Conspiracy!?!)

U.S. Car Makers Warm to Parts of Energy Bill


Listen to this story... (at link above)
by David Welna

All Things Considered, June 18, 2007 · Detroit is not embracing
the fuel-economy standards proposed in the
Senate energy bill, but auto manufacturers are embracing
the mandate for more homegrown fuels, such as ethanol.

Because GM and Ford build cars in Brazil, where ethanol
powers half of the vehicle fleet, they already have
extensive experience and technology for using such fuels.

Shifting to alternatives would probably reduce U.S. oil
dependency, as Congress wants. But skeptics say the auto
manufacturers are embracing ethanol to avoid higher
mileage standards.

(more at link) <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11164716>



Fuel Economy Proposal Meets Resistance in Detroit



Listen to this story...

All Things Considered, June 18, 2007 · Proposed legislation would raise
the requirement for Corporate Average Fuel Economy to 35 miles per gallon over 10 years.

Automakers recently have said it's impossible for them to meet
tougher fuel efficiency standards, but New York Times Detroit
Bureau Chief Micheline Maynard says carmakers in Japan and Europe
already have to meet higher standards.
Maynard talks with Michele Norris.

(audio at link) <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11164719>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. They were quite blunt in one of the articles
"Not worthwhile to build new refineries when there's no guarantee of recouping profits like they have now"

Not enough for them to make money--they need to be breaking profit records for them to consider it "worthwhile"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. How do you scale back Jack Shit?
The reason that big oil doesn't want to build any new refineries is that no one wants to build the last one. A refinery is a 40-50 year investment - and if you've got nothing to refine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BornagainDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Restricting production increases demand which
increases prices. It's an old game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. Refinery hydrogen expansion here
My husband is working on a refinery expansion for hydrogen. It took nearly a year to get EPA approval and it's going to cost nearly $1B.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC