Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britain feared US would 'nuke' Afghanistan: ex-diplomat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:08 PM
Original message
Britain feared US would 'nuke' Afghanistan: ex-diplomat
Source: AFP

Britain joined the United States' invasion to oust the Taliban in 2001 because it feared America would "nuke the shit" out of Afghanistan, the former British ambassador to Washington reportedly told a television documentary to be screened Saturday.

In comments printed in advance in the Daily Mirror tabloid on Monday, Christopher Meyer said that fear explained why Prime Minister Tony Blair chose to stand with US President George W. Bush in his decision to invade Afghanistan in the immediate aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks -- to temper his aggressive battle plans.

"Blair's real concern was that there would be quote unquote 'a knee-jerk reaction' by the Americans ... they would go thundering off and nuke the shit out of the place without thinking straight," Meyer reported told the documentary, according to the Mirror.

Read more: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070618020433.pfpyswe3&show_article=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is not believable
Blair was also close with President Clinton, and the admins here had just switched over for all practical purposes at that time.

Smells like bullshit to me and/or someone with a book deal. This is an "indictment" against the U.S., not just Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I'm actually buying this
Dubya was making noise about bunker bombs at the time - wanted something to burrow into mountain hideouts.

A deep penetrating nuke would be just the thing.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. No offense to the people of Afghanistan, but what would there be to nuke?
All that there would be would be a few larger towns, and a lot of people and their crops and animals in the valleys, save Kabul, which was already in ruins from the Taliban offensive that captured the city from the old Soviet proxy government.
That doesn't make sense, nor does a "former diplomat" giving an interview to the Sun. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. nuke what?
and who'd be able to tell the difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Like others, this is registering on my bs-o-meter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. love the meter!
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 12:00 AM by rayofreason
I am registering a "9".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Likely effort to rehabilitate Blair for EU presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. I could believe this, but remember what we as a country were feeling: PISSED
We wanted to blow the collective shit out of someone in the two to three months after 9/11. We were enraged at the entire Middle East.

A nuke didn't seem like a bad idea to many Americans at the time.

Fortunately, reason set in rather quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Nonsense. Rumsfeld was already complaining on 9/12/01
that there weren't any decent targets in Afghanistan and he wanted to go into Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Don't ya just love the pathetic attempt to whitewash blair's
actions AFTER the fact, what a load of codswallop. blair is a war criminal, full stop, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. They failed and now they are all scrambling
to their masters and explain why they failed

Corporations
I hear your Death rattles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. No one is complaining about Blair joining Bush on
Afghanistan. The complaints are about his joining Bush on Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC