Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush won't supply subpoenaed documents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:32 AM
Original message
Bush won't supply subpoenaed documents
Source: Associated Press

Bush won't supply subpoenaed documents

By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent
2 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The White House, moving toward a constitutional
showdown with Congress, asserted executive privilege Thursday
and rejected lawmakers' demands for documents that could shed
light on the firings of federal prosecutors.

President Bush's attorney told Congress the White House would
not turn over subpoenaed documents for former presidential
counsel Harriet Miers and former political director Sara Taylor.

"With respect, it is with much regret that we are forced down
this unfortunate path which we sought to avoid by finding grounds
for mutual accommodation," White House counsel Fred Fielding said
in a letter to the chairmen of the House and Senate Judiciary
Committees. "We had hoped this matter could conclude with your
committees receiving information in lieu of having to invoke
executive privilege. Instead, we are at this conclusion."

Thursday was the deadline for surrendering the documents. The
White House also made clear that Miers and Taylor would not
testify next month, as directed by the subpoenas, which were
issued June 13. The stalemate could end up with House and Senate
contempt citations and a battle in federal court over separation
of powers.

-snip-

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070628/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_subpoenas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rhetorical question:
How in the HELL are these bastards allowed to do this again and again and again, with impunity and no consequences? I really don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Because the "liberal" media allows them. Enables them, even.
And that keeps the American public apathetic, at best.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. 100% on the money!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
49. Hey, old guy, welcome to DU!
I, too am an old guy - and also a Vikings fan (though in the past couple of years it's been pretty hard). :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #49
64. Yes, as Vikings we do have our cross to bear.
Perhaps in the future in a Galaxy far,far away our dreams will... well forget it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
58. Anybody wanna bet afainst the Supremes upholding Bush?
And BTW, Welcome Old Guy. Chippewa Falls here. I haven't been up that way for a while but I know another DUer up your way (kinda near Danbury, actually).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #58
69. Some day I will get to know more about how these "tubes" work.
At present I'm feeling my way very slowly and carefully. When we used to have snow? in this area, we used to trailer to Danbury and ride the trails north. Very nice up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #69
98. Welcome to DU old guy
I think there are a lot of us old guys on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #98
103. Maybe we can be of benefit somehow with our sage opinions.
God, did I really say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #103
121. Yes, and there are a few smart senior women, too! Moi, for one...
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 03:19 PM by Radio_Lady
Nice to meet-chu on the DU!

In peace,

Radio Lady in Oregon (film, theater and book reviewer)

Aging as gracefully as possible -- just turned 68 on May 31. 35 years in TV and talk radio broadcasting in Miami and Boston, now retired to true blue Portland, OR and volunteering at Oregon Public Broadcasting, the PBS station out here.

http://www.opb.org

More about Radio_Lady at: http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Radio_Lady

OT: Our best friends just moved to Mequon, WI in January. We miss them like heck and we're Chicago, IL and Milwaukee, WI bound for a visit -- probably sometime in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #103
179. I've got lots of sage here
and am being overrun by oregano, thyme and mint!

Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #58
134. You got to be kidding ...
Today they voted to desegregate schools effectively saying that race cannot be used as a quota to fill student vacancies in schools... That is a huge conservative victory... Stephen Bryer said it best today

"Never have so few done so much so quickly" Making the court conservative.

Bush will win and SCOTUS decision hands down.

This country is so divided right now Civil War is not out of the question.

Stand by because this court is far from done...

I predict Roe V Wade to be overturned in the near future that may be the catalyst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #134
137. They don't want to overturn Roe Vs Wade
If they overturn Roe Vs Wade they will lose their most powerful catalyst. This, along with gay rights, is how they invigorate the Christian fundamentalist vote. Think it over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #137
167. So little time, so much to hate
Even if Roe v. Wade was overturned and the Constitutional Amendment prohibiting gay marriage was enacted, the fundies wouldn't be satisfied. There are so many other issues: mandatory Christian prayer in school, full public funding of Christian churches (vouchers are just the tip of the iceberg), the Ten Commandments posted in every public building, the Lord's Prayer said at every public event, etc., etc. Somewhere in the noise of television evangelists and O'Reilly clones the message of Christ -- love your neighbor, take care of the poor and infirm, etc. -- got lost.

The Repugs will always have some hot-button issue that makes their base turn off their ability to think rationally. And if all else fails, they can always fall back on racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #137
170. Right - The carrot is meant to be dangled, not gotten. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkyisBlue Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #134
178. This country is so divided now Civil War is not out of the question.
Sometimes I feel like there are two countries now. I have absolutely nothing in common with the Ann Coulter's and Sean Hannity's of our time, or the people who champion them. It would be great if they could take their elitist, hypocritical and distorted opinions with them to another place and start their own little utopia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #178
196. Civil War?
Sorry, most people are too caught up in Paris Hilton to care what is going on. We are a LONG way from any sort of armed anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #58
147. I'd bet on it. There is no way a President can trump Congress, the Senate and
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 05:25 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
the American people. I suspect the Supremes are judicious enough, if not all virtuous enough, to recognise that.

The US is founded on parallel and opposite concepts. The rights of robber barons to have their will with the people as they please; and the concept of democracy, rule of the people, by the people and for the peopple. Isn't that your expression?

Now, in order to get their evil way, the far right have paid scandalously mendacious lip-service to the latter. Thing is though, this is the ultimate condensation of the said conflict into the most transparent of nutshells.

It is the pivot, the fulcrum, upon which everything the US is said to stand for - by Republicans, no less than Democrats (however often putative the allegiance of the latter to democracy might be). There would be no more saluting Old Glory, singing the Star Spangled Banner, no more dwelling on the history of the country's fight for independence. Any commemoration of "no taxation without representation" would be a total embarrassment. It would be, as if Bush were to order the Statue of Liberty to be taken down and smashed in a public ceremony, and a statue of Honecker erected in its place.

Mendacious propaganda, it seems, can be like karma. It works as long as the whole nation are not able to examine it under a spotlight. If they are... well, you have to restore credibility in an equally simple and transparent way, i.e by compliance of the the Oval Office with the lawmakers' requirements.

When the Supremes, at their pleasure, awarded the presidency to Bush, it was at the apogee of an emotional roller-coaster election charade; not in the clear light of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Bingo!
They are above the law of the land, and have no respect for any stinkin' constitution.

Assholes.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. congress has been enabling them for the last 6 years
there have been ZERO consequences for their crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
34. give that guy a ceegar. the media has been bought and paid for by these crooks
who think they are above any laws and can do whatever the hell they please. dictators do that you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exiled in America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
45. That and because the "democratic" congress alows them. Enables them, even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #45
50. And that is what I lament the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #45
101. 100% agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
72. Wish there was a blowjob involved.
We would have already have an impeachment by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #72
90. This just makes me SICK! We could have an impeachment NOW!
But SOME people CHOOSE not to!

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #72
94. No the blowjob issue applies only to democrats...Just like the laws and the constitution
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 12:30 PM by ooglymoogly
Why do you think those 23% Luddites still support this dangerous fool along with the corporate press. THEY LIKE BEING ABOVE THE LAW...Its a Nazi thing. Its like impeachment only applies to democrats too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #94
129. Naturally the Democrats are too chickenshit.....
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 03:40 PM by Rockholm
to DO anything! What, we don't want the mean nasty republicans to get mad at us? Please. We promise not to filibuster. Timid and meek does not win many battles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #72
135. Well, he's screwing the entire country...
...that should count for something.

Impeach the bastard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #72
183. How do we know
Karl Rove hasn't been on bended knees beneath the Oval Office desk giving the shrub some head?

With Jeff Gannon taking the video...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #183
202. That is ONE image that I just cannot stomach.
Little Jeffy holding the camera is rich, and, while under normal circumstances it could be rather hot, this is one production I would rather not thank about.

Actually, my guess it was Harriet Miers holding the camera. Jeffy was probably the boom man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
93. They wont be tried on FOX and CNN
they will be tried in the courts and the congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
132. and becuase they want it to end up in teh supreme, where they will win every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Because the Dems feel they must "keep their powder dry"?
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 08:49 AM by TechBear_Seattle
Or maybe they are incapable of doing anything (other than meaningless, symbolic gestures) until they know for certain that they are guaranteed of success?

Or maybe, they are hoping to claim the same vast power when the Republicks are voted out of the White House, regardless of how unconstitutional that power might be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
35. junior ain't too bright? He just pissed on us again.
The people are the government and the only way to fight the big corporations that put these thugs in office is to unionize together to fight corporate America and bullshit artists such as the Neocon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. What amazes me is how the Senate doesn't use its power fully
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 08:57 AM by Cronus Protagonist
The Senate, having a Democratic majority and several Republicans against Bush/Cheney now, should be ramming subpoenas up Bush and Cheney's proverbial asses. There should be public hearings under oath by Bush and Cheney and Rice and all the rest of the cabal.

If you don't agree, think for a minute or two about what would be happening if the president were currently Democratic and the Senate was just as it is. You know the Republicans would be like a nest of fire ants and the TV would be filled with pictures of crooked politicians shamefully admitting guilt or fighting like banshees to stay out of jail. Now reverse the picture back again. Why are our guys so slow, so polite, so understanding? WHY ALL THIS DEFERENCE TO CRIMINALS???? WHY????



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
46. It is pointless, anymore, to make the point "If Bill Clinton did this...."
But the fact is, that if Bill Clinton DID do this, or if Al Gore (Hail Al Gore!) had asserted that he was not a member of the executive branch, the talk radio wingnuts would be apoplectic, and would likely be forming lynch mobs to march on washington as we speak. But Dumbya could be caught sodomizing the dead coming into Dover AFB and the yokels would tell themselves he must've had a good reason and then zone out until the next runaway bride update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #46
182. Exactly right. If Gore as VP had failed to produce papers
or asserted executive privilege time and time again, or met in secret with so-called energy task forces, or was always hiding out in undisclosed locations, or had seemed to be pulling Clinton's puppet strings -- then Hannity's head would have exploded with the force of a neutron bomb.

The only tiny comfort I take is that the Dems may very well win the White House, and in January 2009 we will start seeing if the Freepers really like these ideas about unitary executive, and the politicizing the Dept of Justice, and signing statements and having separate email accounts paid for by the DNC, and lack of transparency and photo-ops, and other high crimes and misdemeanors. Any liberties taken in the WH office will be applicable to the new President and Vice-president. I can't wait to see how the roaches in all those government offices scatter when the Dem president has the Bush-granted rights to wire-tap anyone he GD well pleases...legally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #182
215. Freepers will, of course, have reasons why all of the Chimpy precedents
cannot be invoked by a democratic president. Jesus may or may not be involved. Everything will be different. EVERYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
60. I think ultimately you have to be prepared to send in guys with
guns and handcuffs into the White House, and you better have ALL your ducks in a row before you do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #60
66. I'm wondering if you might be right about that.
This could get interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
125. obstruction of justice-put these criminal bastards in handcuffs & haul them to jail, where they
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 03:29 PM by wordpix
should stay until these docs are handed up to the Hill.

That is the sight I'm waiting for but looks like BushCo will just run out the clock. I wish Congress would just arrest these obstructors-of-justice. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
154. Precedent
At least when Dems are in office in 2008 we can use this as precedent to blow off subpoenas. Oh wait, that won't matter since we'll be in control of Congress too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
175. Because, well, in our system of gover OMG - PARIS HILTON IS OUT OF JAIL!!!
Shiny thing!! Lookee!! Shiny thing!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #175
186. ROFL!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
181. The Dem "leadership" is too cowardly
to allow John Conyers to investigate their crimes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
213. The big money big corporate shareholders own all 3 branches of govt.
And the media. They get what they want. In any language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. rape is never "mutual accommodation"
and that is what this mal-administration has done to this country, its Constitution and its government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Crashing trying to protect the mad monk


Have they not learned anything from history? Oh I forgot they are all under some sort of spell that makes them put his defense above their own best interests

They know that if this goes to the SC they had better than a 50/50 shot at winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Citing contempt of Congress is next
followed by censure.

Bought judges voting against the constitution are sowing the seeds for their eventual impeachment as the pendulum continues its swing back from the brink of fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. A confrontation in the Supreme Court is exactly what they want
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 08:57 AM by formercia
They want their rigged court to affirm the Unitary Executive. if they do, God help us.

This has been the Federalist Society battle plan all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Is the Supreme Court decision as a lock?
Is the fix in, like in 2000? Or will the court defy Bush, like with Gitmo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
november3rd Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
97. kennedy
I don't think kennedy is one of those unitary executive wingnuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
116. The "fix" will be in
There is no way they rule against Bush. The Neo-Cons have effectively pulled off a successful coup d'Etat and the American people aren't even aware of it. Welcome to fascist America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Right
exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
54. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #18
70. if Supreme court negates Congresses power that would
eliminate checks and balances

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #70
140. And it would be a successful
And it would be a successful coup d' Etat by the Neo-Cons. We have been taken over by fascists and the American people don't even realize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #70
153. Agreed.
Plus the fact that if the SCOTUS would rule the congress irrelevant do they not realize that they will be setting themselves up as well? * could simply say he doesn't need to pay attention to the court and since the court has said congress has no over site, * rules alone. Too far fetched?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
148. I think you are exactly right. These criminals having been pushing towards this goal
for the past six years. Once the Supreme Court right wingers vote for Unitary Executive Privilege, we will have
an official fascist state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Now's the time, Dems. Now's the time to use all that powder you've been keeping dry...
It's now or never...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, please God/FSM, do something here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm having flashbacks to the 70s
That contempt case ended only because of a resignation, if I remember correctly. (But it was the seventies so you'll have to forgive me if my memory is a little shaky.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. I see moron* as the type to take everyone down with him*...
nixon resigned. moron* will make sure that everyone takes the blame but him*, but in the end he* will be and like he* always has been, the biggest loser of them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
123. if the haze is purple, you really were there n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
130. Another White House Deja Vu Moment
There were a few other layers of wrangling to cover up the
wrongdoing and specious invocations of executive privilege, if
I recall, including much that amounted to obstructions of
justice on top of obstructions of justice. But yes,
mind-boggling similarities for some of us who lived through
that era as well.

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat
it.' 
George Santayana



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
185. nixon resigned
'cause after the good guys made the case against him there were enough pukes convinced that they should remove him.

Conyers should have been allowed to begin the process the day the Dems were sworn in control of the Congress.

Fuck Pelosi and her cowardice!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think back of the Pelosi change of power hoopla and wonder if today's new's of
Bush's refusal to supply subpoenaed documents will also fade into the Dem's list of bothched attempts to make this administration accountable?!! getting really pathetic folks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Like a fart in the wind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
88. Absolutely. Congresss has got to show that
they mean business or our chances in '08 are shaky at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
191. The fix was in before that...
when they confirmed Alito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
206. long past pathetic and well into complicit.
coroner's report:

cause of death or u.s. democracy: dry powder syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Time to give the US Marshals tanks & send them in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. Here comes the backbone time. Will the Dems show some or will the back down?
sigh. So sad that I even have to ponder such a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
48. It pains me to say that I expect them to back down.
But c'mon, guys, prove me wrong!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #48
74. This is the Dems way of saying; "now folks make sure you vote Dem for next prez...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is beyond unbelievable
My God, everyday it gets worse. I said 6 years ago to my family...."If we only knew 1/8th of what was REALLY going on...our hair would fall out." This is getting really scary...they have deemed us all powerless simply by refusing anything they want coming down the pike. The apathy of the American Idol mentality has painted us all in a corner. God help us all.:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. Bush wants to force this into his Supreme Court.
I'll just point out that Supreme Court judges can be impeached by the Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. Welcome to DU!
Yeah, a lot of us were in that same place - trying to warn the resolutely ignorant, apathetic, or "too busy". But even we couldn't have guessed how far or how deep or how egregious...

Dear God, I hope the Dems are going to flex some muscle.

My kingdom for a Democratic backbone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Decruiter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #40
199. Calimary, you are just wonderful. You say it all so well and so quick.
I'd like to recommend to all the DU Activist Forum and please, get involved in any action Calimary suggests.

Thank you, C. You are one of the bestest of the best ever in the long history of DU.

Peace\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
20. Someone in Dem leadership needs to call a press conference
And announce, loud and clear, that this admin. thinks they are above the law of the land, and that congress has no choice but to act on this immediately.

Has anyone heard any response from the Dems?

crickets.....


:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
176. no shit! I agree 100% lousue
this IS the time.. it's like a movie scene right about now, and the credits are about to roll, are they going to force the issue by law against this fascist state that says they can do whatever they want with no oversight, or are they going to lay back and get paid for their meaningless position in the gov't that effectively just decides where the money is scattered?
www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<<---- speak on your car with these stickers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
211. Sure...and it'll be shown 24/7...
Exclusively on the shopping channel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jollyreaper2112 Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. ITMFA
Impeach the motherfucker already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherCTliberal Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
159. Exactly! Ridiculous how long overdue this really is!!
Impeach, Indict and IMPRISON! Enough already!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. If Bush caved and supplied subpoenaed documents it would open
a can of worms of investigative material going back to the election fraud in 2004, if gives an inch they lost it all... it's up to the Dem's to flex there backbone if they have one?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. if the dems cave on this, it's time to pull the sheet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
24. Erm, impeach Gonzales now, then the Justice Dept. won't be compromised
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 09:12 AM by bunny planet
anymore. This is a hydra administration facing us, lets start lopping off some heads so we stand a chance in the Constitutional crisis that's coming down the road.

There's more than enough reason to impeach Gonzo, he's lied under oath several times. Hello. Pick the low hanging fruit first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
26. They are using executive privledge, if it goes to the supreme court
the court will rule 5-4 in the administration's favor

When will the Democrats in Congress get it through their head that the ONLY way to hold this administration for their actions is impeachment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
28. This is the last straw...
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 09:31 AM by Highway61
The Dems have to stay on this like a bunch of pit-bulls...this IS the moment of truth....PUSH BACK GOD SAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
133. It could be the beginning of the end for bushco.
Lettem have it! both barrels! The Senate has got to go for the jugular on this, or they might as well castrate themselves--they'll be impotent forever if they let chimpster win on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #133
165. How many times have we thought this though? Seriously.
The entire government is controlled by the corporations - the government is just a charade - a show to provide us hope and drama that somebody at some point is going to actually do something for the American people.

But it will never happen - because it's just a TV show. Hearings are shows. Votes are shows. Speeches are shows. It's all a big illusion.

And in the end, sure there may be somebody who gets "busted" - but even that's just the nature of show business. Even actors get fired and written of a show every once in a while.

The corporations will always win in the end, after all, they are the "sponsors" of the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
29. This is good! No weasling out of this by Congress!
Many of us have waited for the right time, and this is it. They have until July 18th to comply, and then it's time for contempt citations, which I believe document their criminal behavior. Then congress should move to impeachment proceedings. Leahy and Conyers know the drill, but the rest of the gang might need some diaper changing to follow through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #29
47. I doubt it will happen. Perhaps someone should educate them on the Constitution
and what their duties are. Major abuse of power has occurred, from illegal wiretaps, invading a country based on lies, an attorney general who lied under oath, and witness tampering, and the only thing congress does is talk with no action

There is a reason their popularity is so low


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realbluesky Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #29
59. Don't count on it
I agree with your sentiments, but I have lost faith in the Dems to do anything right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
119. So what do we do when the Dems do... nothing?
Because that's the party's track record, despite massive criminality on the part of the administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
30. Who didn't see this coming!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
32. This asshole just doesn't have to play by the rules
How many times have we seen this before? And if they don't like the rules, they go and change them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
33. bu$hco continues to abuse OUR government and OUR laws.
Impeachment is definitely on the table now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
36. Now that purported "legal genius" Roberts gets to pen some pedestrian opinion cutting and pasting
from some "unitary executive" piece undoubtedly published by the Federalist Society.

It is impossible for an ideologue to be a genius, or anything close to genius, or anything -- actuualy -- other than a toady, a slave, a lobotomized, pathetic shell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
100. He doesn't have to,
I bet he has already done it. He is ready and waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KalicoKitty Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
38. This is very interesting regarding Constitutional Scholar Jonathan Turley

This was on an mlive.com forum: http://www.mlive.com/forums/newstalk/index.ssf?page=-1

I Saw Constitutional Scholar Jonathan Turley On Countdown Last Night....


He presented an interesting possibility. If the Democrats base their case for the records on possible criminal activity (illegal warrantless surveillance ordered by Bush)it could open the door to impeachment. So, Bush could be opening the door to possible impeachment or criminal charges after he leaves office by fighting the subpoena. Could get very interesting. I'm just not sure the Democrats Congressional leadership is smart enough or courageous enough to go down that road.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. That last sentence is the key: The Democrats are neither smart nor courageous enough to go to the
bathroom without getting permission from the GOP, much less smart or courageous enough to save the Union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realbluesky Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #38
63. We could only hope
I saw the same thing. And I agree that door is wide open, but I don't have very much faith in the current batch of elected dems to do anything that takes a little political courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #38
80. Yeah. US v Nixon was decided in the context of a criminal case:
US v. Nixon

The Supreme Court addressed that the 'executive privilege' in United States v. Nixon, the 1974 case involving the demand by Watergate special prosecutor Leon Jaworski that Richard Nixon produce the audiotapes of conversations he and his colleagues had in the Oval Office of the White House in connection with criminal charges being brought against members of the Nixon Administration. Nixon invoked the privilege and refused to produce any records.

The Supreme Court did not reject the claim of privilege out of hand; it noted, in fact, "the valid need for protection of communications between high Government officials and those who advise and assist them in the performance of their manifold duties" and that "uman experience teaches that those who expect public dissemination of their remarks may well temper candor with a concern for appearances and for their own interests to the detriment of the decisionmaking process." This is very similar to the logic that the Court had used in establishing an "executive immunity" defense for high office-holders charged with violating citizens' constitutional rights in the course of performing their duties.

The Supreme Court however rejected the notion that the President has an "absolute privilege." The Supreme Court stated: "To read the Article II powers of the President as providing an absolute privilege as against a subpoena essential to enforcement of criminal statutes on no more than a generalized claim of the public interest in confidentiality of nonmilitary and nondiplomatic discussions would upset the constitutional balance of 'a workable government' and gravely impair the role of the courts under Article III." Because Nixon had asserted only a generalized need for confidentiality, the Court held that the larger public interest in obtaining the truth in the context of a criminal prosecution took precedence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
39. Executive privilege to avoid Constitutional oversight...makes those
docs appear very significant. I read yesterday on DU that Cheney gave the docs to National Archives until 2003, so he knows the drill just does not want to continue it. Very suspicious. I doubt in the Cheney/Bush duo there is anything left to subpoena.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
41. It is way past time for our congress to say...
"The American people have had it with this President. He has great disdain for Congress and its oversight role. He cares nothing for the Constitution, and he has destroyed our confidence in the fragile system that the founding fathers painstakingly developed over 200 years ago. In light of this, we have no other option than to begin impeachment proceedings. The framers gave our country this ability for exactly the situation we find ourselves in today. An out of control president who flaunts the rule of law and ignores the role of Congress must be removed from office. He is a danger to our way of government and he must be replaced. We have tried many times to work with him only to find that he repeatedly ignores the wishes of Congress and the American people. Perhaps with impeachment our country can begin to believe in itself and its leaders once more."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
42. OK, so the Admin has thumbed their noses at the Dems again. Now what are they
going to do? Are they going to slink away and say "we tried". How many times have they tried?

Are they going to use the excuse about the numbers in the senate and house?

I think we all understand their difficulty but we at least want some follow-up, some balls and some effort at getting something done.

So far they have been very weak and seem to cave if Bush just looks at them sternly.

However, I will continue to hope for something out of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #42
65. If a subpoena is issued
the person to whom it issues has to comply or be in contempt. Contempt has sanctions that can end up in jail time if the one in receipt of a subpoena remains recalcitrant.

One who receives a subpoena can also move to quash it.

These are the procedures. It is not that Congress is "weak" or "caving" but that * is thumbing his nose at the law. Congress has to follow through, but if they are going within the rules, it's all they can do, so all the frustration with them expressed on DU is just failure to appreciate that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #65
82. Thanks. So then they need to follow up on the sanctions against
whoever is in contempt. Is that correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #65
102. Which court decides if the supeona
is quashed? Does Congress make that decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #102
208. self-delete. refer to post # 71 nt
Edited on Fri Jun-29-07 08:06 AM by tomp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alllyingwhores Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #42
76. The bottom line is power and being consumed with holding on to it at all cost
The bottom line is power and being consumed with holding on to it at all cost...and, I'm describing Dems--with few exceptions.

The whole gutless, spineless, all talk BS is a part of it. The whole trying to over-think and over analyze to avoid any possibility of losing an individual seat is a big part of it. And, they being part of the same plutocracy is the biggest part of it!

I've been reading DU for several years and I've gotta be as fucking pissed off as anyone--but as far as I'm concerned, the waiting is over. Again, with few exceptions, we're being played.

Short of an all out rebellion, this same shit is going to continue forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #76
83. Understand and I am with you. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
44. Nixon's ghost seems to inhabit Bush now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #44
114. Nixon seems like a boy scout now.
Cheney junior & Rove have perfected the play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #114
138. now don't go insulting the Boy Scouts like that..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
51. How many Republicans will continue to be lap dogs?
They turned against Nixon, but for some reason they still think Cheney/Bush are gods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #51
115. Not enough of them will.
That is my guess. They will defend their turd of a leader forever. Bank on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #51
117. Maybe it's because those who turned against Nixon R gone now.
The "New" (de-)generation of Republiks thinks bu$che/chainy R divinities. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
52. Take 'em to court, expedite the process, and then get it into the hands of the Supremes.
Do it.
Do it now.
Do it before the summer recess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
53. When are We The People
going to recognize and NAME the actual POWERS behind this puppet administration (with its de facto CEO Dick Cheney)?!? The Corporate Megalomaniacs--and who doesn't see that Cheney IS their CEO?!--have been successfully creating an environment most conducive to their profitability for the duration of Bush's administration (and before)! Are we too frightened to address this flaw inherent in Capitalism?!? Are we SO invested in grabbing the brass ring ourselves that we refuse to acknowledge that our own greed enables this administration?!?

I read recently a comment posted on Crooks and Liars decrying the impeachment of Dick Cheney. The author of said post asserted that impeaching Cheney would make him a martyr, and that "this is what they want!" Setting aside for now the question of who comprises this undefined 'they' (see above), consider this: this is a specious, vacuous argument, spun for us, I'm confident, by the Republicans themselves: "If they believe that impeachment will turn the nation against the Democrats, they won't impeach!"

We The People have begun to amass our voices and our votes. We The People want impeachment. We The People MUST use impeachment to heal our great nation, and to restore ourselves in the eyes of the rest of the world.

As Teddy said, "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public<\i>." Teddy was a Republican--a TRUE Republican.

Be steadfast in your bravery, my fellow activists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. Durn, again
If I can only remember to use the forward slash in my HTML!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #53
189. Exactly the game they are playing..
Since they control media, they control the spin. They beat Dems to punch, because of it & spin out reasons why Dems "can't" or "shouldn't" do X or Y or Z.
If we see it, why can't our Reps in Congress see this?

BTW, Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realbluesky Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
55. IMPEACH NOW
It's the only way to stop them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
56. Serously, did anyone here ever think they would do anything to
further this investigation. Bush is sure that he has the courts in his hands and will win over the law/Constitution every time. The four SC right wing decisions yesterday proved that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cureautismnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
61. Justice Kennedy is the key if this goes to the Supreme Court.
We have 4 that work for the good of America and 4 that are basically evil-doers toward the common man. Kennedy sometimes comes down on the righteous side. Lately, though, he's been siding with the troglodytes. Hopefully, his Gitmo rulings will carry over here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #61
194. if he lives.................n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
va4wilderness Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
62. Fire him n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
67. What is it going to take..
...for justice to be served?? I am so fucking sick of all this. We no longer live in a democracy, the average American just doesn't realize it yet. I guess the only other recourse is to have another revolution as suggested in the Declaration of Independence. I don't see anything else that would work. Unfortunately, it is not a viable option. And so we continue down the path to facism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
68. Its official this is a Dictatorship Congress makes no difference
we have a Constitutional Crisis

Congress doesn't matter
Laws don't matter

its reality

Bush controls the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
71. Speaking of Presidents and Subpoenas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gamey Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
73. The shredders are working overtime
Soon there will be nothing to subpoena. Like millions of e-mails, they will have been "lost".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #73
111. Welcome to DU! Yes indeed, those shredders are going 24-7 as we speak.
and the longer the Democrats stall, the more shredded paper goes out the door to the incinerator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #73
112. self-deleted - wrong thread
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 02:41 PM by CLW
deleted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
75. What? We still don't have enough evidence for Impeachment yet?
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 11:14 AM by ShortnFiery
I thought that The House was DUTY BOUND to file Articles of Impeachment when warranted? I didn't know that our "illustrious" leadership can COWARDLY opt-out of their duty to uphold the Constitution ONLY WHEN they're sure that they'll snag enough votes to be successful.

Really - How do they honestly KNOW that they will not be successful in Impeaching Bush, Cheney and Gonzales if they don't even have the courage to FILE (with more than sufficient evidence) and begin the process? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #75
113. Wow, you really sound "concerned".
The way you distort things, it was the Democrats, and not Bush, who's the one refusing to comply with a subpoena.

:eyes: :eyes: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
77. Pelosi has disappeared, Reid has gotten boring to hear, WTF?!!
Bush & Cheney is laughing in our faces and Dem's merely point fingers with excuses!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
78. Impeach. Indict. Aggressively Interrogate. Convict. Imprison. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. If they FAIL to act, we are obliged to KICK OUT our House Leadership despite
their seniority. I had high hopes of Nancy Pelosi. All her characteristics, personality wise, were seemingly ideal for the first woman leader of The House. However, her lack of courage NOW is leaving me cold. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
81. Impeach. Indict. Imprison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
84. The fucking "Associated Press" quoted whole portions of Bush's lawyer, and only stated
that the Democrats "accused Bush of stonewalling."

They are quoting Bush's arguments without telling the people that the nation is in jeopardy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
85. Like they were ever going to comply.
They're laughing their asses off at the entire country. They're traitors and something drastic needs to be done now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
86. Talk about a power grab
If you think the press is limited to what it can print and prioritize, check this out....the Repug $ machine is like a cancer...slow and insidious

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070628/media_nm/dowjones_murdoch_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ringtailtooter Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #86
209. Good Link, did not know this. So much for WSJ.
Hope the walkout has some impact on Bancroft's decision. However, they may be pressured by higher powers to sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
87. Its time.
Time to override that Executive Priviledge smiveledge. Bring on the criminal investigations per Prof Turley's description yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AandP Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #87
92. Exactly
I think you are correct. If they want documents and testimony they are going to have to appoint a prosecutor and bring formal charges...without a formal charge this is just a fishing expedition and a waste of time. Without formal charges the WH is not going to provide anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
89. How are the Alito and Roberts comfirmations looking right about now Senators?
Christ on a popsicle stick! BushCo™ is going to get away with this and run out the clock on the worst chapter in the American Presidency.

If anyone thinks that the Roberts Court, the court that just voted for resegregation by striking down VOLUNTARY integration in public schools, is going to do the right thing and uphold the Constitution, they are dreaming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
91. mutual accommodation? GMAB!
'do it our way or get nothing' is NOT accommodation, you twit!

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
95. Congress Can Overcome Executive Privilege if Investigating Potential Crimes
VIDEO: Congress Can Overcome Executive Privilege if Investigating Potential Crimes
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1203352

Discussion just started:
--------------------
FOCUS of the thread: Charging the President and Vice-President with criminal offenses.

QUESTION: Will Congress overcome Executive Privilege claims by focusing on potential criminal offenses.

Are we now just one step away from pulling impeachment out from under the table? Bush and Cheney know fully well that there has been a de facto impeachment in process with so many investigations and their focii. Have we reached to point where Dems can no longer keep impeachment under the table?

... scholar of Constitutional Law, Jonathan Turley, points to the way around Executive privilege, "the way Congress can get around the executive privilege in court is to say, we're investigating a potential crime."

...................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #95
106. Hopefully this is what they are going for. Congress wanted to exhaust every possible
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 01:30 PM by KoKo01
avenue to deflect the cries of how the Repugs went after Clinton. It's painful to go through this for all of us who want these criminals impeached ASAP...but the public has to become so vocal to drown out the M$M who will take every opportunity to use the RW Media Whore and the Corporations to go after Dems to try to make this look like a witch hunt.

The Cheney WaPo article was a big thing in opening up what Cheney has been doing. While we here on the internet knew most Americans didn't really have a context for what they might have started to suspect.

I hate this waiting...but we are going to have to suffer more to get these criminals out. Wall St. is starting to suffer from their policies. The propped up "economy" was the Repugs last bit between them and disaster.

The pressure always had to come from us...the people. There's so much criminality and culpability in Congress that they are compromised....and there's only a "Few Good Men & Women" there these days after the Gingrich Congress and the Bush Criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #95
136. Turley said this on Olbermann's show.
No impeachment needed -- just federal crimes (wiretapping w/o warrants) with grand jury convening, indictment and trial.

Turley also said this administration needed some "Adult supervision"!!! :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #95
145. And you are not the judges of the merits of the evidence.... We are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connonym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
96. You ever feel like it's the end of the earth as we know it?
and I definitely don't feel fine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AandP Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #96
105. Hardly
Politics as usual...the Congress critters have to make it look like they are doing something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
99. This is such bullshit. The Dems are total cowards if they don't act
are are just as treasonous as the enemy. It's time to recall Pelosi if she rolls over and does nothing again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #99
108. Immediate Articles of Impeachment
Anything less is cowardice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Ected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
104. If Bush Is the Weakest President In Our History
Then this Congress will surely go down as the weakest in history as well.

The Bush cabal has played a game of chicken with the Dems for the past 6 months...and come out looking like John Wayne.

In hindsight, America will realize, far too late, that dozens of squandered opportunities helped preserve and maintain the Bush regime, at a cost to our nation that is wholly incalculable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
107. Maybe whistleblowers in the NSA could provide said documents
over the transom, so to speak. On the QT, the hush hush, as Danny DeVito once put it.

The NSAer who does so would be able to collect a treble damage award, from what I've heard about the legislation re illegal acts of govt.

Hell, DU could even encourage this ! The insiders need to speak out too, or remain complicit. What's it gonna be ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
109. Will 'moderate' Dems agree to fight on?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #109
120. No. Moderates would rather criminals walk for political expediency.
I've certainly seen enough of those cowardly assholes arguing such here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #120
168. My impression as well. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemSoccerMom Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
110. And this is surprising, why?
We have become a nation of lawlessness. No one is required to abide by those pesky things called laws anymore -- unless of course you have the (mis)fortune NOT to work in the Executive Branch of the government.

I regret to say that I'm not even a LITTLE surprised by this latest move by BushCo . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
118. Such lawbreaking usually results in arrest.
I suppose the Dems will send another empty-threat letter asking the administration to pretty-please follow the law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
122. Congress is responsible to Americans and DO THEIR JOBS
they gave Bush money for Iraq
and now the moment of Truth is here

they have the responsibility to Americans to coral this renegade presidency

I can see that states will be leaving the US of America

we could be looking at Civil War in America

I can see that coming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
124. We need a president who worries less about his own ass and more about his country's. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyra Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
126. Americans need to shout out
What the fuck are they hiding! There is one reason for this bullshit...they are hiding crimes against the American people. They know it and WE know it. Every press conference should consist of one question...what is this administration hiding?

We should be beyond waiting for a political solution to this criminal takeover of our government and our justice system. There should be a tsunami of dissent heading for Washington with one goal in mind...REMOVE THE CRIMINAL ADMINISTRATION FROM OFFICE BY FORCE IF NECESSARY. It is obvious the dems are powerless against the media and the republican henchmen.

We can stand by and watch our republic be dismantled by these fucks or take action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #126
139. You are right on!
If the media was unbiased the only question would be, "What is this administration hiding?"

Maybe we could start that up as a sound bite, a talking point. Let's all pitch in to generate enthusiasm for this talking point-mantra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
127. I want to echo what others on this thread have said
We need to stand up. WE do. The Dem leadership won't, so we do. We all need to e-mail and phone our representatives. I wish the DU activist corps was up and running. This is the perfect job for the corps that our profiles all say we belong to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #127
150. Why ISN'T the DU Activist Corps up and running?!!!!!
Without some kind of real organizational thrust -- we're just whining into the wind....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #150
151. exactly
I've asked on a few threads (even directly to Skinner) and haven't received a reply. I'm not ciriticizing, because I know they're busy. Maybe if he heard from others besides just me it might help. There is a lot of energy here, thousands of people, that are willing to do something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sbyte Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #151
198. Diverse Group, Insurmountable odds, certain failure, --
WHAT OUR WE WAITING FOR?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It takes money and people on the ground willing to go to the meetings as a Representative of the group. Which would take focus, and talking points, and some kind of unity and long term commitment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
128. How shameless can these people get?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
131. So, when is Congress going to get the message to pursue Impeachment and Criminal Charges?
:shrug:

Just wondering....what's it going to take????? Doesn't this qualify as obstruction of justice????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
141. THEN THROW HIS FUCKING ASS IN JAIL!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
142. Why should he?
The Dems have backed down over and over.

They've given the little sociopathic bully and his administration almost EVERYTHING that they've wanted- with little meaningful opposition.

Frankly, if I were Bush under the circumstances- I'd NEVER willingly cooperate with the Democrats. What are they going to do about it?

Whine to the corporate media and look even more pathetic?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
143. Where is Barbara Jordan when we need her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #143
149. I don't know who she is, but I bet she and Burt Reynolds are mucking about
with crossbows in some faraway rustic location, oblivious to the nation's hour of need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #149
173. Look up Barbara Jordan's speech as a congressional member of the Watergate Hearings.
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 09:38 PM by CLW
One of the all-time great orators concerning constitutional law and power grabs by an "imperial" president. And a Texan, by the way (may she RIP) -- she would have been embarrassed by *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #149
187. Barbara Jordan and Elizabeth Holzman
Holzman is still with us:

"Approximately a year ago, I wrote in this magazine that President George W. Bush had committed high crimes and misdemeanors and should be impeached and removed from office. His impeachable offenses include using lies and deceptions to drive the country into war in Iraq, deliberately and repeatedly violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) on wiretapping in the United States, and facilitating the mistreatment of US detainees in violation of the Geneva Conventions and the War Crimes Act of 1996.

Since then, the case against President Bush has, if anything, been strengthened by reports that he personally authorized CIA abuse of detainees. In addition, courts have rejected some of his extreme assertions of executive power. The Supreme Court ruled that the Geneva Conventions apply to the treatment of detainees, and a federal judge ruled that the President could not legally ignore FISA. Even Attorney General Alberto Gonzales's recent announcement that the wiretapping program would from now on operate under FISA court supervision strongly suggests that Bush's prior claims that it could not were untrue. "

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070212/holtzman
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20070126_impeachment_back_on_the_table/

And Barbara Jordan's speech on the impeachment of richard m nixon will send CHILLS down your spine:

"Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Mr. Chairman, I join my colleague Mr. Rangel in thanking you for giving the junior members of this committee the glorious opportunity of sharing the pain of this inquiry. Mr. Chairman, you are a strong man, and it has not been easy but we have tried as best we can to give you as much assistance as possible.

Earlier today, we heard the beginning of the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States: "We, the people." It's a very eloquent beginning. But when that document was completed on the seventeenth of September in 1787, I was not included in that "We, the people." I felt somehow for many years that George Washington and Alexander Hamilton just left me out by mistake. But through the process of amendment, interpretation, and court decision, I have finally been included in "We, the people."

Today I am an inquisitor. An hyperbole would not be fictional and would not overstate the solemnness that I feel right now. My faith in the Constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total. And I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution."

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/barbarajordanjudiciarystatement.htm



GOD DAMN I wish the Dems still had this kind of courage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #187
204. Thank you for those quotations, ProudDad. Both evidently great women,
but wasn't that Barbara Jordan some orator! I love that elliptical wit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #149
190. Your really DON'T know who she is!
That mental picture is both frightening & implausible!

But thanks for the laugh. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #190
201. Your welcome. I hope the lacunae in my knowledge continue to bring
Edited on Fri Jun-29-07 07:30 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
you the same level of fearful incredulity and delight!

We are only on this earth once, and it means a lot to me spread happiness wherever I can. The level of intelligence - even sanity - of my beneficiaries is of no interest to me. We're all Jock Tamson's bairns! Thank you for sharing with me, old crone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
144. Let's git it on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
146. BushCo renegades and criminals and a fascist supreme court
...if these nazis have nothing to hide why are they hiding everything? It is because they do have much to hide from the American people which if it was brought out into the sunlight would expose their real intentions much of it outrageous and unconstitutional and the people would demand Bush's removal from power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
152. King George
congress should remove the kings crown.Hello Nancy,when are you going to put that impeachment back on the table,are you waiting for the kid to destroy america?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarface2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
155. i am going to make a citizen's arrest!
up against the wall you emmm effer!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
156. It's put up or shut up time, Dems
I haven't the foggiest idea why you suddenly became silent when Condoleezza Rice rejected her subpoena but you better intend to go through with unless you want to come across as a bunch of wimps yet again to your supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #156
158. Yes, no more backing down without a fight. This is put up or shut up time.
I realize, given today's 5-4 Supreme Court decisions, that we are nearing the time when Roberts and Alito are expected to pay off their benefactor by exempting him from the law. If he gets away with this, we are one step away from martial law. The GOP will back Bush all the way to a dictatorship, so it's up to the Dems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
157. This is what happens when you allow them to steal an election...
You give them an inch they take a yard, and thay have been taking for the last seven years. Time to IMPEACH THEM ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
160. Brings back old times doesn't it?
Only this time Iraq..........Bastards

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMfRHbZ3dO4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
161. He better be careful or the Dems will send him another non-binding resolution
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #161
163. I doubt it
The republikkans with LIEbermans support will prevent closure -- ie filibuster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
162. Gonna be a fun summer, watching junior do the 'o stutter dance
I think congress will impeach cheney's dick....LOL!!
So long sucker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
164. I guess its time for another angry letter.
Whoop dee fucking doo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
166. I remember when Pelosi said she would make this admistration accountable for
what she was never really quite that clear, today she says it isn't worth it to impeach Bush, she never explained why Cheney was off limits??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
169. This is what happens when one has a "gradualist" Democrat-Corporate Congress.
Do you want your body extricated from a burning building "gradually?" I do not. Well, with the "let's play nice with everyone" philosophy of the mainstream and DLC Democrats, that is what happens. One gets pooped on and then ordered to clean it up yourself. Welcome to the Alito/Roberts Court! A dull time will be had by none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjdnb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
171. Aw, shucks, sure he will ....
unfortunately, by the time he does, it won't matter. Just like with all other rich and/or powerful people (Nixon, Reagan, etc.) even when it is proven they've committed crimes and screwed the country, they manage to slither off with a sack full of dough, into comfortable retirement, leaving the rest of us to pick up the pieces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubeskin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
172. This is just wrong - We need to Destroy America
After having not posted for a long time (but still lurking) this has got to me to post again.

As one of the few high schoolers who post here, I want to say, that I REALLY hope, that when I'm 20, Bush, or another family member, isn't in the official position of what was known as the presidency. This is just wrong. Ten years from now I don't want to have to watch what I say or do, and be arrested because of one small flick of the eye which indicated I was against the government. The more and more I read, what was the just government of the United States of America, has become the Clearly Politically Divided Regions of a Landmass in a fascist state.

I've always wanted to do a small experiment, and take 1000 Republicans and 1000 Democrats, give them a 100 sq mile area, and actually make it another country. They have to make a government, and survive the longest. I always thought it would be interesting to see how completely different the results were.

The more news headlines I see with "Bush" in the title are sending off the little beeping noise in your head, that says "You need to do something. This isn't right." Looking at history, all fascist nations have ended up being destroyed internally, many times because of the large dissenting factions. I'm just going to say this. Maybe the only way, to actually change The United States of America, and bring justice, happiness and life to the landmass we call North America, is to completely abolish, and change it ourselves.


From The Declaration of Independence
http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, having its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Such has been the patient suffrance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.


Perhaps I'm just a radical high schooler looking for change. But 40 years ago, high schoolers were taking action. Entertainment rallied in support of change. Constant protests to raise awareness of how large a base there was for change. Many of the things going on now, happened then. The only difference is that now, in the age in which technology reigns, it seems logic has died. Even though it's easier to gather support and work for change, people don't.

Even the side that stands for justice, the people, and protecting their rights, the Democratic Party, is sitting back, twiddling their fingers, while a tyrant gains control of the country. Representatives, Senators, and the President are all ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE. If THE PEOPLE don't feel the same way as their "elected" officials, then something really is wrong.

As many have already mentioned, few media outlets will cover this. Too many people care about how Paris Hilton feels about jail, or are curious if that one guy is a fit father for Anna Nicole's baby.

It's time for change. Massive change. If Bush is still President when I turn 20, I will know your generation has failed us.

It's time for change. Now. For the next generation, which desperately needs your help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
april Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
174. the BS King has spoken..oh what a web they weave when at first they....nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
177. Breaking: Dems threaten to re-send the subpoena in CAPITAL LETTERS to show they mean business
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #177
180. Rep Waxman has INSIDERS spilling their guts ! Qui tam time
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 10:19 PM by EVDebs
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/062807R.shtml

Dana (Perino) speaks, Dana lies...Damn, this is the '70s all over again. Economy, environment, a Dick for president. What next ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
184. So now Bush makes people think he is trying to cover it up
what a silly move on his part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
188. Barbara Jordan's speech is TOO important to leave upthread
Listen and weep...

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/barbarajordanjudiciarystatement.htm

God DAMN, why don't the Dems have this level of courage any more... Oh, I know, they've been bought off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetheonlyway Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
192. it can all change on a dime folks..
and it probably will sooner than later.

it will be a very small straw that breaks this big oil hunting camel's back.

i'm seeing the winds shift with momentum on impeachment in strange places.

let's hope that washington state gets the impeachment thing moving forward...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iLikeJello Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
193. FUCK BUSH!
As eloquently put by Jello Biafra: "Since Bill Clinton got impeached for unauthorized weenie-moistening, and Governor Gray Davis in California got recalled from office and replaced by a two-bit thug from Hollywood just for raising the tax on cars, shouldn't George Bush, Dick Cheney, and every member of Congress who voted to send another $87 billion dollars towards the war be impeached for treason?!"

Send their asses to jail!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #193
216. They certainly should
Unlike Bush, Clinton didn't commit murder so his corporatist buds could line their pockets with blood money.

And now, all of our children will pay because America is not standing up to the shrub, aka The-Thug-In-Chief.

Undeservedly you will atone for the sins of your fathers.
Horace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
195. HOW MANY WAYS TO SPELL "KICK THE BUM OUT"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
19jet54 Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
197. Rocket Science...
... Yea, DUH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
200. Jail all of them for contempt of court nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
203. Nothing of any signifcance will be done. Any takers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
205. We all know he has contempt for Congress, the legal justice system ....



and our right to know. This just serves to underscore what we already know. The BushCo regime is a pack of thieves and liars and they are living on borrowed time. It's just a matter of time before they will be held accountable for their crimes against the American people and the Constitution.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #205
207. God everytime I see that picture of Rush
It freaks me out! Yikes. He is gross
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #207
210. OxyRush puts gross at an entirely greater level.



:puke:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ringtailtooter Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
212. 3 POINTS OF INTEREST
1. THE DUMBING OF AMERICA: A recent Newsweek poll conducted asked people on the street some current event questions. Some results were: only 14% of public knows who John Roberts and Sam Alito are. 41% still think we found WMD in Iraq and they were connected to 9/11 and 60% didn't know the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.

2. BLACKWATER: Don't forget Bush has his private army of mercenaries, the Blackwater outfit. The company is growing by leaps and bounds funded by our taxes. He could use them on us as easily as you know who used his storm troopers.

3. FEAR: A healthy government is one that fears its people. An unhealthy government is one who's people fear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #212
218. Excellent points, right on the money (no pun intended)
Welcome to DU, tooter!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
focusfan Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
214. we need to impeach
it seems like to me Bush throwing his weight around.he needs
to be stopped. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hideboh Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
217. We are the frogs in the pot
Bush knows that nobody can stop him.
He is just testing the water to see how far he can go.
Eventually, he will act like a dictator if nobody stops him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC