Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panel Holds Two Bush Aides in Contempt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 01:50 PM
Original message
Panel Holds Two Bush Aides in Contempt
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 02:20 PM by AikidoSoul
Source: N.Y. Times


WASHINGTON, July 25 — The House Judiciary Committee voted today to seek contempt of Congress citations against a top aide to President Bush and a former presidential aide over their refusal to cooperate in an inquiry about the firing of federal prosecutors.

The 22-to-17 vote along party lines escalates the battle between the administration and Congressional Democrats over the dismissals of nine United States attorneys last year, an episode that Democrats say needs airing but that many Republicans say is much ado about nothing.

“It’s not a step that, as chairman, I take easily or lightly,” the head of the panel, Representative John D. Conyers, Democrat of Michigan, said before the committee voted to cite Joshua B. Bolten, the president’s chief of staff, and Harriet E. Miers, the former White House counsel.

To take effect, the Judiciary Committee’s recommendation must be voted upon by the full House, where Democrats have a 231-to-201 edge, with 3 vacancies. Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not said whether she would seek House action before the lawmakers recess in early August, or allow the issue to simmer until the House reconvenes after Labor Day.

SNIP



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/25/washington/25cnd-contempt.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin




If the full House votes for contempt citations against Miers and Bolten, the next likely move would normally be to communicate with the U.S. Attorney for D.C. -- unfortunately, a Bush appointee.

The White House stated recently that Congress has no power to make a U.S.attorney push for prosecution, or convene a grand jury -- because the refusals to testify were motivated by executive privilege.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, you think they'll be pardoned, regardless?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That will kill W's legacy.
Pardoning people to cover your own ass? That'll get him down to around 18% approval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He'll do it in January 2009.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't Nixon try something like this?
Or something like it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pardoning people in a crime he was involved
with is grounds for impeachment. Ordering the courts not to pursue the contempt charges is, too. I hope they vote on this NOW and lock the m*therf*ckers up in the basement for the recess as they have hinted! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC