Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spy Chief to Restrict Intel Estimates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 04:37 PM
Original message
Spy Chief to Restrict Intel Estimates
Edited on Fri Oct-26-07 05:10 PM by Eugene
Source: Associated Press

Spy Chief to Restrict Intel Estimates

Friday October 26, 2007 10:46 PM

By PAMELA HESS

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - National Intelligence Director Mike
McConnell has reversed the recent practice of declassifying
and releasing summaries of national intelligence estimates,
a top intelligence official said Friday.

Knowing their words may be scrutinized outside the U.S.
government chills analysts' willingness to provide
unvarnished opinions and information, said David Shedd,
a deputy to McConnell.

He told congressional aides and reporters that McConnell
recently issued a directive making it more difficult to
declassify the key judgments of national intelligence
estimates, which are forward-looking analyses prepared for
the White House and Congress that represent the
consensus of the nation's 16 spy agencies on a single
issue. The analysis comes from various sources including
the CIA, the military and intelligence agencies inside
federal departments.

Referring to the public release of the reports, Shedd said
during a Capitol Hill briefing: “It affects the quality of
what's written.”

-snip-

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7027602,00.html



EDIT: Updated AP story new title

Original story: Intel Estimates to Be More Restricted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. thanks for the laugh!
I'll just bet the prospect of actually being read restricts what they say!

And "unvarnished"--is that the same thing as shit without the shinola?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Quality and Intel? Please! Stop ! When I laugh too hard my side hurts!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :hurts: :hurts: :hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Recall what the 2002 est said-------SH NOT have nukes:
The 2002 NIE contained a warning from the State Department's intelligence office that it did not believe Iraq was actively pursuing a nuclear weapon. That dissenting opinion was not widely disclosed until after the war had already been launched, largely on the president's assertion that Saddam Hussein's program for weapons of mass destruction posed an imminent threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. ``The public needs unvarnished assessments as well. Without them, we stumbled our way into the war i
The trend toward releasing NIEs started about four years ago, most notably with the White House's July 2003 disclosure of key judgments from a controversial NIE on Iraq's weapons-of-mass-destruction program. The White House was pressured to release those findings after parts of the NIE that supported the Bush administration's case for war against Iraq were leaked to the press.

Steven Aftergood, the director of the project on government secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, says national intelligence estimates should be released in their entirety.

``That doesn't mean disclosing sensitive intelligence methods or the identity of confidential sources. But that's not what estimates are,'' Aftergood said. ``The public needs unvarnished assessments as well. Without them, we stumbled our way into the war in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC