Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Workers Plead No Contest In Recount-Rigging Case (Cleveland)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:56 PM
Original message
Election Workers Plead No Contest In Recount-Rigging Case (Cleveland)
Source: AP

POSTED: 3:02 pm EST November 5, 2007
UPDATED: 3:06 pm EST November 5, 2007

CLEVELAND -- The case against two elections workers charged with rigging a recount during the 2004 presidential election in Cleveland was settled Monday.

Prosecutors said Jacqueline Maiden and Kathleen Dreamer rigged the recount to avoid a more thorough hand-count. The election outcome wasn't affected.

Under a plea agreement, the women pleaded no contest to negligent misconduct and failure to perform official duties.

They were placed in a diversion program. Their records will be cleared if they avoid legal trouble for six months.

The women were convicted in January but won a new trial that was supposed to begin Monday.


Read more: http://www.newsnet5.com/news/14515655/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good to hear....
they were just dupes and should have never been persecuted in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. what? People have died for the right to vote. Prosecution was imperative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Diversion program?
:wtf:

I think televised waterboarding would be excellent punishment. "Look. Here is the non-torture way we deal with people who interfere with elections".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. The election outcome wasn't affected. I've heard that one before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Each incident 'didn't affect the election outcome'. In total ..... they stole it.
What poppycock. OF COURSE the outcome was affected. People's votes were STOLEN. By Repubicans,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's a classic!
"Nothing to see here, folks; move along."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Where did you find that "Don't Tase Me Bro" flag?
That's Classic! LOL!:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Actually,
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 10:57 PM by bleever
I made it, and you can get it printed on stuff if you really want it at www.cafepress.com/satire_veritas .

ed: proceeds will go toward funding donations to Democratic candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hey! I just found the perfect X-Mas gift!!!
"Don't Tase Me Bro" flag - Teddy Bear!!!



<http://www.cafepress.com/satire_veritas.182887702>

<http://www.cafepress.com/satire_veritas>:rofl: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Their recount caused Kerry to pick up votes, and I think those two are Democrats
Edited on Tue Nov-06-07 09:03 AM by dmesg
This is another "throw the little guy under the bus" prosecution

On edit, I want to be clear: I'm not saying I condone their selection of precincts, I'm saying there were much more important problems than this, and choosing these two for prosecution while letting the rest of what happened in the state go smells like throwing someone under a bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garthranzz Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. THE ELECTION OUTCOME WASN'T AFFECTED?!?!?!?
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 10:16 PM by garthranzz
HOW WOULD THEY KNOW?!?!?

THE BANK ADMITTED TO A MASSIVE ACCOUNTING ERROR, BUT NO FUNDS ARE MISSING.

:argh:

:nuke:

:banghead:


THIEVES, LIARS, VILLAINS ALL!

BUSHCO STOLE IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nice little Memo from the MSM's AP! Here's the more complete story, link here!
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 10:30 PM by Up2Late
This is absolutely OUTRAGEOUS!

Elections board workers take plea deal


Posted by Jim Nichols November 05, 2007 11:26AM

A special prosecutor ended a two-year drive to convict two county elections workers for rigging a ballot recount during the hotly contested 2004 presidential election....

(edit)

... At issue was how the board and its staff conducted a sample recount of ballots after third-party candidates demanded a countywide vote recount. That sampling was meant as a test of the validity of tabulating machines; if a hand count of the sample - 3 percent of the county's votes - proved the machine count accurate, the board could assume the broader automatic tabulation was also accurate and forego a tedious, expensive and potentially embarrassing hand recount of all 600,000-plus votes.

The board staff rigged the sample count because the precincts actually were secretly selected in advance of the closely watched recount, said Baxter, who was brought in to try the case because Mason is the board's lawyer. The pre-count ensured the 3-percent sample included only precincts whose hand and machine counts matched.

Dreamer, Maiden and a third worker, Rosie Grier, were charged for the fudging. They countered that the board had always done things that way - with the knowledge of its attorney, one of Mason's assistants.

"There was no evidence to that effect - none," Baxter said.

He faulted the media for spreading that "convenient misrepresentation," and for falsely portraying the board managers as low-level employees.
Such media portrayals, and a string of editorials in The Plain Dealer that blasted the prosecution as an "overreach, weakened the prosecution's moral foundation by persuasively misrepresenting the case's facts," Baxter said.

(more at link)
<http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2007/11/elections_board_workers_to_tak.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. It really feels like we're living in 1930s Chicago
The mob and the media in bed together, subverting justice? Say it ain't so.

Where the hell is our Elliott Ness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. "The election outcome wasn't affected." They NEVER did a complete investigation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Convicting people of rigging the recount still doesn't fulfill the recount law.
It's like saying, We caught the cheaters, but we won't recheck the results or the process.

Case closed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. What??? A diversion program?? I may puke.
I can't think of much worse than election rigging other than rape and murder. I can't believe they are getting off this easy!!! These people should be nailed to the wall!:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick, more and more proof it was stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC