Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force grounds entire fleet of F-15s

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 03:53 AM
Original message
Air Force grounds entire fleet of F-15s
Source: Boston Globe/LA Times

Air Force grounds entire fleet of F-15s
Move in response to plane breaking in midair last week

By Peter Spiegel, Los Angeles Times | November 6, 2007

WASHINGTON - The US Air Force has grounded its entire fleet of F-15s, the service's premier fighter aircraft, after one of the planes disintegrated over eastern Missouri during a training mission, raising the possibility of a fatal flaw in the aging fighters' fuselage that could keep it out of the skies for months.

General T. Michael "Buzz" Moseley, the Air Force chief of staff, ordered the grounding Saturday after initial reports showed that the Missouri Air National Guard fighter plane broke apart Friday in midair during a simulated dogfight.

Although the 688 F-15s in the Air Force's arsenal gradually are being replaced by a new generation of aircraft - the F-22 - they remain the nation's most sophisticated front-line fighters. US officials said the F-15s are used heavily for protecting the continental United States from terrorist attack, as well as for combat missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Lieutenant General Gary L. North, the Air Force officer in charge of military aircraft in the Middle East, issued a statement yesterday saying he would be able to fill the gap with other fighters and bombers. But another Air Force official said the F-15 grounding will have a "significant impact" on operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Read more: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/11/06/air_force_grounds_entire_fleet_of_f_15s/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Indi Guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is disturbing news.
So much for the superior nature of a Republican government's ability to enforce national security.

This administration is corrupted from top to bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not good. Our nation's security is so very much worse since 2000.
Everything is a clusterfuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indi Guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. A clusterfuck indeed.
And it's not by incompetence, it's by design.

As long as Cheney/Bush oversee the debilitation of our defenses & our rule of law, they facilitate the drive of the trans-national lobbies that have them in their pockets.

These "leaders" are certifiable traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. They have been stealing Billions and letting the military
fall apart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indi Guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wouldn't be surprised to see an early attack on the US now,
calculated in such a way that the primaries & general election are influenced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thank you for your concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Pea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Who would attack us?
Especially where F-15's would be involved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Belgium. obviously
Or the terrorist state of madagascar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Sadaam loyalists could still slip through some of their WMD's
using the planes and subs and aircraft carriers they have buried with them out in the desert somewhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. hell, with all they hid, they could attack the grand canyon!
and make it into a bigger hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. that hole on earth could open a can of worms which would be a
kettle of fish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. would that be the kettle calling a pot black?
or enameled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johncoby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. $540 Billion a year on defense, and our planes are falling apart?
This is out of control spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. Now, if this was an education program
The Republican solution would be to starve it of funding and try to terminate it. I wonder what the Republican solution will be to a military problem where the machinery isn't working? Please choose from the following:

A. Throw more money at the problem.
B. Give no-bid contracts to politically-connected white guys.
C. Throw a LOT more money at the problem.
D. Cut health care spending.
E. All of the above.

You have 15 minutes. Please use a #2 pencil. Keep your eyes on your own paper. Begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Cost of F-22 is $360 million each for the first 183 planes ($62 billion)
After that, the per unit cost is supposed to drop to $120 million each for a production run of another 100, or so the prime contractors says. If we accept these numbers (sure we should, there's no such thing as cost overruns), therefore, the total cost of replacing the F-15 on a one-one basis would cost somewhere around $360 billion.

There's a lot of incentive in those numbers to show that the F-15 is a dangerous aircraft, unfit to fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. And the F-22 is in the shop for corrosion repairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. It was intended to be ready for combat by 1997,but the Raptor has yet to fly a single combat mission
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. How can that be? I saw a flight of them in Transformers
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Didn't a whole flock of these
flying in the pacific, cross the meridian, and have their nav computers totally crash, along with their comm link? I think this was August this year. They made it back to Hawaii, barely, and only because they spotted contrails from their refueling planes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
41. Cost of upgrading existing F-15 fleet: $3 billion. You do the math.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-15.htm

The F-15 initial operational requirement was for a service life of 4,000 hours. Testing completed in 1973 demonstrated that the F-15 could sustain 16,000 hours of flight. Subsequently operational use was more severely stressful than the original design specification. With an average usage of 270 aircraft flight hours per year, by the early 1990s the F-15C fleet was approaching its service-design-life limit of 4,000 flight hours. Following successful airframe structural testing, the F-15C was extended to an 8,000-hour service life limit. An 8,000-hour service limit provides current levels of F-15Cs through 2010. The F-22 program was initially justified on the basis of an 8,000 flight hour life projection for the F-15. This was consistent with the projected lifespan of the most severely stressed F-15Cs, which have averaged 85% of flight hours in stressful air-to-air missions, versus the 48% in the original design specification.

Full-scale fatigue testing between 1988 and 1994 ended with a demonstration of over 7,600 flight hours for the most severely used aircraft, and in excess of 12,000 hours on the remainder of the fleet. A 10,000-hour service limit would provide F-15Cs to 2020, while a 12,000-hour service life extends the F-15Cs to the year 2030. The APG-63 radar, F100-PW-100 engines, and structure upgrades are mandatory. The USAF cannot expect to fly the F-15C to 2014, or beyond, without replacing these subsystems. The total cost of the three retrofits would be under $3 billion. The upgrades would dramatically reduce the 18 percent breakrate prevalent in the mid-1990s, and extend the F-15C service life well beyond 2014.

The F-15E structure is rated at 16,000 flight hours, double the lifetime of earlier F-15s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
42. The F-22 is only intended to replace the F-15 C/ D, not the newer F-15E variant
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. how can a fighter jet protect against a terrorist attack?
just curious how all of this conventional war machinary we throw BILLIONS into is better than intelligence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indi Guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's not a matter of "better," it's a matter of "both"
For decades, America has depended on good intel and good conventional arms.

These days, we have neither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. sorry
Edited on Tue Nov-06-07 06:26 AM by leftchick
I don't agree. Afghanistan is an excellent example that approach's failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. The Air Force *should have* shot down three of the hijacked airliners on 9/11
Those overpriced spy satellites are *another* good example of technology that should be replaced with intelligence officers poring through data and a few quiet agents on the ground in countries like Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. hey, they are radar invisible, That is how. sheesh
how dare you not protect our troops by applying supercruise technology against those crafty - ahem - ragheads?

Remember that they are shelling the green zone, by bringing in horse and mule pulled carts into baghdad. Your traitorous position on the F-22 means that we may not be able to stop those carts until they've launched their attacks into our super safe embassy. I repeat, sheesh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. As if the insurgents have radar.
More Cold War hardware being used to fight an asymmetric conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. Well, if terrorists were going to hit a building with a hijacked plane...
You could scramble fighter jets. Although, for some reason that doesn't always work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sss1977 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. uh huh...
Yeah, those fighter planes certainly did a boatload of good on 9/11. Protecting our airspace with jets is just a remnant of the Cold War. They are useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Useless because they were ordered to stay on the ground.
Our air defenses were not allowed up until after the Pentagon was hit with whatever hit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. Time for Dubya to drag out the Chinese Visa card again.
But the economy's good . . . honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. The Military Industrial Complex will continue to suck up OUR tax dollars
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."


"Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we -- you and I, and our government -- must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow."
-Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961
http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SyntaxError Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
26. So is this a way to get more F-22s?
Perhaps a bit cynical, I dunno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. F-15s Grounded after Crash
Source: USA Today

The U.S. Air Force has grounded its entire fleet of 700 Boeing Co F-15 aircrafts after one of the flying fighters crashed in Missouri on November 2.

Maj. John Elolf, a spokesperson for the U.S. Air Force Central Command said that the F-15Es would be allowed to fly only in emergency situations in Iraq and Afghanistan to protect U.S. and help coalition troops in the battle. F-15 military aircrafts are known to be in use since 1975 and officials said that they put in danger the life of people who commands them, CNN reports.

"They have become serious maintenance challenges as they get older, and now I'd suggest that we may be facing a crisis. We must recapitalize our aging fighter forces - and fast, Lieutenant General David Deptula said in a statement.

Air Force officials believe that the crashing aircraft might have disintegrated in the air in the Friday accident. The pilot successfully ejected from the aircraft before it crashed suffering non-threatening life injuries.

. . .

Loren Thompson a military analyst with the Lexington Institute expressed his concern regarding the aircraft retreat from the battlefield: “The planes that are grounded are supposed to be America's top-of-the line air superiority plane. This is not like grounding some cargo plane. These are the sinews of our global air dominance,” Boston Globe reports.

Read more: http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/11/air-force-groun.html



Also grounding F-15s are Japan and Israel
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/11/06/219205/video-israel-and-japan-join-us-in-grounding-f-15s.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Israel grounding its F-15Is is good news
It lessens the chance of WWWIII in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Not really.
Now their nukes will be their first response.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. oh damn.
but how will they deliver them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Uh...with missiles.
They have all of the technology we have. And then some in some areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. even small nukes are pretty heavy
Although the Israelis have some interesting anti-missile missile stuff (and they improved on our patriots rather well) I am not aware of any attack missiles they have, bought, stole or had given to them by us.

Of course, all it takes is a call from Cheney, and that would be solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. fwiw, the F-15 from wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-15
The F-15 first flew as a successful prototype in 1972, then became an expensive prop in a bunch of cheesy '80s movies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I knew they were old
seems to me they were used in the waning days of the Vietnam fiasco...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. No, the F-15 was after Viet-Nam.
I'm sure the U.S. Air Force will enjoy doing the paperwork on selling the parts for these for many years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC