Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Gives Clearances for N.S.A. Inquiry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 10:22 PM
Original message
Bush Gives Clearances for N.S.A. Inquiry
Source: New York Times

By SCOTT SHANE
Published: November 14, 2007

WASHINGTON, Nov. 13 — Just four days after Michael B. Mukasey was sworn in as attorney general, Justice Department officials said Tuesday that President Bush had reversed course and approved long-denied security clearances for the Justice Department’s ethics office to investigate the National Security Agency’s warrantless surveillance program. The department’s inspector general has been investigating the department’s involvement with the N.S.A. program for about a year, but the move suggested both that Mr. Mukasey wanted to remedy what many in Congress saw as an improper decision by the president to block the clearances and that the White House chose to back him.

Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman, and Brian Roehrkasse, a Justice Department spokesman, declined to say whether Mr. Mukasey had pressed Mr. Bush on the clearances for the department’s Office of Professional Responsibility. Mr. Mukasey himself had indicated in a written answer to senators on Oct. 30, before his confirmation, that the clearance issue had been resolved. But Democrats said they thought Mr. Mukasey deserved credit.

“It seems the new attorney general understands that his responsibility is to the American people and the rule of law and not to any particular person, including the president,” said Representative Maurice D. Hinchey, Democrat of New York, who had first demanded the internal Justice Department investigation.

In response to appeals from Mr. Hinchey and other members of Congress, the head of the Office of Professional Responsibility, H. Marshall Jarrett, said in February 2006 that he had opened an investigation of the conduct of department lawyers in approving and overseeing the N.S.A. program. But three months later he said the inquiry had been dropped because his staff had been denied the necessary high-level clearances....

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/14/washington/14justice.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mallard Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now that the AG is sworn in ...
... this case will get quickly and efficiently swept under the carpet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It sucks being cynical, doesn't it?
But I would have to agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. being cynical is what keeps me going with this Administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. I dunno. I think it quite possible that it will proceed steadily...
...without accomplishing a thing by Inauguration Day. Whereupon we will be told that the nation needs healing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sure he has. His personally appointed minion will make sure that justice is done.
Or not.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. We shall see -- will it be new investigators or the crew that got to close for comfort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. True.
There are a couple of clearly divergent paths the Justice Dept could follow.

I hope there are enough there that can appeal to the retired judge's understanding of the law. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush* sharade. All pre-planned, forgone conclusion. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proReality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ahh, the evidence must finally all be shredded.
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 11:15 PM by proReality
Edited to add a word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. sounds like a media-friendly charade
Bush agrees to release information to make Mukasey look tough, Mukasey agrees to find nothing suspicious in whatever load of crap they feed him, to make Bush look good. NPR bought into it hook line and sinker today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sss1977 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. exactly right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Window dressing.
Ya know there was a point before election 06 where I knew in the depths of my soul that we would be rescued by a "Democratic" congress.

Every hope I have ever had for the restoration of our democracy and constitution has been smashed.

I fully expect the investigations w/clearances to be bleached.

I fully expect the telecoms to receive immunity.

I fully expect the further erosion of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights of the United States of America to be systematically dismantled under the pretenses of "fighting the WOT" and "Political Expediency" by the leadership in both houses of congress.

I have come to the realization that you don't fight the bastages; you just watch their progress and wonder where to move.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. And then there's THIS!
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 06:34 AM by deacon
WASHINGTON (CNN) — In his second day on the job, Attorney General Michael Mukasey leaped into the political fray, telling a key Democratic senator he opposes his electronic surveillance plan and would recommend the president veto it if it is passed.

In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., on the eve of crucial committee votes to update the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), Mukasey was adamant in opposing Leahy's plan for changing the law.

Mukasey and Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell co-signed the letter released Wednesday night by the Justice Department.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/14/new-attorney-general-opposes-changes-to-wiretap-law/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. so just because he does one good deed, he is off the hook?
I still do not trust Mukasey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC