|
In April, 2007 it was asserted<32> that Kasparov was a board member of the National Security Advisory Council of Center for Security Policy,<33> a "non-profit, non-partisan national security organization that specializes in identifying policies, actions, and resource needs that are vital to American security".<34> Kasparov confirmed this and added that he was removed shortly after he became aware of it. He noted that he didn't know about the membership and suggested he was included in the board by an accident because he received the 1991 Keeper of the Flame award from this organization.<35>.<36> But Kasparov maintained his association with the neoconservative leadership by giving speeches at think tanks such as the Hoover Institute.<37> - wikipedia
Well if you're against the Bush-Cheney cabal then it's hard to reconcile your support for their man in Moscow.
lala_rawraw, I don't know where you base your assertions from. Please be more forthright with how you obtain your knowledge of the issues in Russia. I'm an American living in Russia and have met most of the opposition in Other Russia. They have plenty of freedom to express themselves. They're celebrities in fact. I'm a photographer and have photographed a few of them for magazines. In shooting portraits, I need to bond with them to get a sense of character. They're pretty much fringe groups that don't really have wide support from the people. And as far as press is concerned, they get plenty of it and people widely know who they are. Yet there is no wide support for them. You mean to tell me that 3+ groups of Other Russia only gathered 3 thousand people for a protest in a city of 13 million. And please don't say that people are intimidated to join in protest. I live here and know the environment and culture. They have the freedom to do it if they support it.
Your assertion: "And let us not forget that massive murders of Putin's political opponents, critics, journalists, etc." Please name them and the proof, because you're implicating something of a serious nature and linking it to specific people as if it is obvious. The proof can be circumstantial, but needs to be quite convincing. Because I haven't heard logical argument to this effect from anybody yet.
As for Kasparov getting jailed, I can tell you it was a PR stunt. Kasparov himself is saying he isn't protesting to get elected. He had permission to rally and march, but when you have disparate groups such as Limonov's National Bolsheviks Party with ultranationalist skin heads in the mix of Other Russia, violence staged to get some good PR is a natural. Take a look at any picture shot of the event and see the protesters and then the subsequent image of Kasparov in the back of a police bus, smiling and giving the victory symbol. He wasn't cuffed and held down. He was held for 5 days and released to be filmed voting (not voting) in the Duma elections along with Limonov side by side. Another interesting fact about Limonov, is that he fought along side the Serbs during the Balkan wars and was a supporter of Serbia's fight against the Albanians in Kosovo. Then there is the Peoples Democratic Union who is lead by Mikhail Kasyanov who was called Misha "2 Percent" because during the Yeltsin Era, he pass business deals while he was Prime Minister for a 2 percent cut for himself.
Then there's Boris Nemtsov of Union of Right Forces, who was basically Yeltsin's right hand man. If anybody has the political knowledge to be part of the government is him, but he is associated too much with Yeltsin, which basically makes him not popular. His group along with Yabloko even boycotted Other Russia 2006 summit in St. Petersburg, because of the presence of extremist groups in the mix. Yabloko and Union of Right Forces have similar agendas, which is in line with the West more. If combined they would have a large (although not controlling) block in the Duma, but last year in negotiations in combining parties to overcome the 7% votes necessary to be elected into the Duma, negotiations broke down. This lead to both being not able to capitalize on the elections. So it seems the "opposition" can't even get it together, because of their own special interest. Whose to blame for that?
...stands as Americans...You say you "think you're seeing" the same thing in Russia? I'm not sure how you are seeing it. I'm seeing if from the ground here and intermingling with Russians from the low to high. Of course not everybody likes Putin or his policies, but they are free to express it. There's no secret police. Many of my friends are journalist and regularly write equally scathing attacks against Putin like Politskaya did. They're fine. But yet the majority of Russians like him. And unless your saying Russians are stupid or docile, then there is something disparate about your comments that Putin is a monster. I'm not a fan of Putin, but I think there is a lot of disinformation about Russia in the West. Let the Russians be and let them deal with their country. I've seen the misery that was a direct result of the corruption of the liberalization of Russia's resources from the 90's. And when I say liberal, it isn't the US definition of liberal. Liberal in anywhere but the US means pro-business, pro-markets, pro-capitalism, just like our Republican party.
And one last thing, I know my posting might seem long, but in order to be informed, we as Americans need to stop taking and giving information in headlines. It has dumbed down our society to condense our communications to speaking points.
|