Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Australian Terror Detainee (David Hicks) to Be Released

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:17 PM
Original message
Australian Terror Detainee (David Hicks) to Be Released
Source: NY Times

SYDNEY, Australia — David Hicks, the only person sentenced by the military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try suspected terrorists, is scheduled to walk out of prison in Australia on Saturday morning, the government said, after serving nine months for providing support to a terrorist organization.Mr. Hicks had been held at Guantánamo for more than five years prior to his appearance before the military commission in March, when he pleaded guilty as part of a plea bargain. The deal, in which Mr. Hicks acknowledged that prosecutors had the evidence to prove that he had been an Al Qaeda trainee who was prepared to fight Americans in Afghanistan in 2001, allowed him to serve out the remainder of his sentence in his native Australia. He also agreed not to speak to the press for one year.

Speaking from his modest home in Adelaide, South Australia state, Mr. Hicks’s father, Terry Hicks, said that his son was drafting a statement to express his regrets for the difficulties he has caused and to thank those who have supported him.

Mr. Hicks’s case has been highly politicized. After allowing Mr. Hicks to remain in Guantánamo for five years without any significant protest, Australia’s Prime Minister at the time, John Howard, came under significant domestic pressure to secure his release, or at least a trial. Mr. Howard made what was tantamount to such a demand on Vice President Dick Cheney when he came to Australia earlier this year. Formal charges and the plea bargain quickly followed.

After his release, Mr. Hicks will be subject to a so-called control order imposed by the Australian government. He is limited to one e-mail account, one mobile phone number and one land line, which must be registered with the police. He is also under a midnight to 6 a.m. curfew, and must report to the police three times a week.

“How is he supposed to get a bloody job if he has to report to the police three times a week?” Mr. Hicks’s father said.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/29/world/asia/29hicks.html?ref=world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gharlane Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmmmm....
Now this is interesting....

From the article sabra linked:


Eventually, went off to Pakistan, filled with romantic notions of riding the Silk Route on horseback, he told his parents. But still filled with a military desire, he joined Lashkar-i-Taibi, the guerrilla group run by Pakistan intelligence for the war against India in the disputed territory of Kashmir.

He then made his way to Afghanistan, where Laskhar-i-Taibi had training camps, in affiliation with Al-Qaeda. After the United States begun the war against the Taliban in Oct. 2001, Mr. Hicks was captured by the Northern Alliance, which was fighting with the Americans against the Taliban, and turned him over to the United States military for a bounty of several thousand dollars.

In seeking the recent control order, the Australian government adopted the view that Mr. Hicks was a threat to national security. Among the evidence the government introduced were letters he had written to his parents when he was Pakistan and Afghanistan. In them, Mr. Hicks speaks glowingly about Osama bin Laden, whom he claims to have met 20 times, which experts say is surely a boast, and spouts anti-Semetic rhetoric.


OK, let me get this straight:

Pakistani intel runs Laskhar-i-Taibi.
Laskhar-i-Taibi has training camps in affiliation with Al Qaeda.
Pakistan is (supposedly) a US ally in the (repeat after me) Global War On Terror.
Al Qaeda is (supposedly) a US enemy in the (repeat after me) Global War On Terror.

Somehow, we haven't heard complaints from BushCo about this alliance.

I know, none of this probably shocks most DU readers.

Still, it's a bit jarring to see it reported so... matter-of-factly by the NYT. Buried of course 16 paragraphs into the article.

Or maybe not. :P

(Cross-posted from http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3117649">this thread.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC