Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Baghdad embassy's fire-fighting system is defective

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 05:32 PM
Original message
Baghdad embassy's fire-fighting system is defective
Source: McClatchy Newspapers

Baghdad embassy's fire-fighting system is defective
Warren P. Strobel | McClatchy Newspapers

last updated: January 11, 2008 03:53:58 PM

WASHINGTON — The fire-fighting system in the massive new $740 million U.S. Embassy in Baghdad is defective, according to documents obtained by McClatchy and U.S. officials, who allege that their concerns were ignored or overruled in a rush to declare the complex completed.

"As far as I know, nothing's been fixed," said one State Department official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he feared retaliation for speaking to the news media. "The lives of the people who are working in that building are going to be at stake" if the complex doesn't meet building codes, he said.

Last month, 19 days before he retired, State Department buildings chief Charles E. Williams certified key parts of the embassy's fire-fighting system ready for operation, according to the documents McClatchy obtained.

His own fire-safety specialists and an outside consultant, however, had warned Williams and his aides repeatedly about numerous violations of fire safety codes.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/iraq/story/24626.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kimmylavin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sorry for the language...
But are you FUCKING kidding me?
$740 million for an American Palace, and they can't even put in fire safety equipment correctly?
Is this just so someone can make another $5 or $10 million to fix it all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. One mortar and the whole building goes up in flames
BRILLIANT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep. Then, a Halliburton subsidiary gets the contract to rebuild it,
Ad nauseum....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Better give KBR another 10 billion to upgrade it
or 20
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. well, they can poke holes in the light fixtures and
let the excrement and urine outen any fires that might happen. Sheesh, these guys are the best contractors in the world and the only ones capable of handling such large projects and they suck big time. I guess that's what happens when you are on the government teat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. And Condi can't figure out why her employees don't want to go to Iraq?
Yeesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Baghdad Embassy Is Called A Fire Risk
Source: Washington Post

The firefighting system in the massive $736 million embassy complex in Baghdad has potential safety problems that top U.S. officials dismissed in their rush to declare construction largely completed by the end of last year, according to internal State Department documents, e-mails and interviews.

Some officials assert that in the push to complete the long-delayed project, potentially life-threatening problems have been left untouched. "This is serious enough to get someone killed," said a State Department official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he feared retaliation. "The fire systems are the tip of the iceberg. That is the most visible. But no one has ever inspected the electrical system, the power plant" and other parts of the embassy complex, which will house more than 1,000 people and is vulnerable to mortar attacks.

Other sources involved in the project, also requesting anonymity, insist that disputes involve technical paperwork issues, largely because the contractor had never built an embassy and did not realize that under State Department rules it needed approval for substituting certain materials. Now, much of that work needs to be reexamined and checked, they said, substantially delaying the project's completion.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/11/AR2008011103772.html?hpid=topnews



Well, gee, it's only 3/4 of a billion dollars.
Wonder if the contractor was a friend of Darth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The snow will help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Like the planned NAZI white elephants -- it is the architecture of empire.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2577290

Sick reality, but empire is the most profitable line of business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC