Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China build-up has US worried

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 07:50 PM
Original message
China build-up has US worried
Source: Times of India

16 Jan 2008, 0001 hrs IST

BEIJING: The top commander of the US Pacific Fleet raised concern on Tuesday over China’s military build-up and urged Beijing to clarify the intentions behind its increasingly sophisticated armed forces.

Admiral Timothy Keating said he urged Beijing to increase transparency in military affairs during talks with government and defence officials here which focused largely on the issue of Taiwan. "China’s military is developing very impressively," Keating said.

"We are concerned about the development of long-range cruise and ballistic missiles, we are concerned about their anti-satellite technology (and) we are concerned about area denial weapons."

In talks on Monday, Beijing agreed to bring military exchanges with the US to a higher level, a form of cooperation that could help allay growing concerns over the intentions behind China’s military build-up, he said.


Read more: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/China_build-up_has_US_worried/articleshow/2703173.cms



The US is NOW beginning to worry about China??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whom do they mean by "has U.S. worried?" Do they mean me?
I'm not financing China. I didn't take any factory abroad. I swear I didn't. I'm surrounded by products of American companies that have the Chinese manufacture them, but I try not to buy them. It really pisses me off when they assume that everyone in the U.S. makes decisions for he U.S., when only the rich few do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. let's have another republican/democrat sponsored war, 2 is not enough nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, right. We are going to take on a million man army

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheLastMohican Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. 3 million man army to be precise
and 27 million reserve.

But numbers don't mean much in the age of technology and China is quickly catching up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. If I was China I would tell America Fuck off. It's america who has
her military all in China's neighborhood. It's America that accounts for half of the military spending in the world. Do we realize how fucking stupid we sound on the world stage. Thanks to George Bush the world community is waking up, they don't trust us any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. yep
and China and Russia held joint war games last year,because of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The US accounts for half the world's miltary spending?
Not for long. Osama is winning. The US economy is collapsing just like the Soviet Unions. Our military expenditures are unsustainable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Osama is Winning?
Would that be the Fat Osama or the Skinny One?

I just can't keep up. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. The dead one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. The skinny one is graveyard dead. The fat one is a paid, bad actor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancer78 Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. So true
It was our support for rebels in Afghanistan that caused the collapse of the USSR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. Last I Knew, The US Spends More Than All Other Nations Combined -NT-
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 11:07 AM by jayfish
Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. They need help understanding the intent behind a military build up?
No too bright are they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boricua79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. HEH...
"The top commander of the US Pacific Fleet raised concern on Tuesday over China’s military build-up and urged Beijing to clarify the intentions behind its increasingly sophisticated armed forces.

Beijing: "Making sure we don't end up another victim of your imperialist history and a target of choice for your cocaine-snorting Presidents. Sorry if we don't fall for the bullshit like your people do. Kindly, China".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. What the US stands for
...rabid unilateralism, trashing the non-nuclear proliferation treaty, PNAC, provocative armed actions in the Persian Gulf and Taiwan Strait, etc.


If I were China, I'd probably be doing the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, we DID effectively dismantle the structure of International Law and reinstate the Grand Chess-
-board of the 1890s.

Thus, China should tell us to go fuck ourselves. It's their Grand Chessboard to manuever on, too.

Plus, they are our banker and creditor. From the perspective of having us in hock tothe eyeballs, they should tells us to go fuck ourselves, too, or they'll preemptively strike us.

Reap what you sow, Bushies. Reap what you sow.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. I am sure the US is transparent about it's military..
to China.. China can kick our ass, the US needs to mind their own damn business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. China cannot win against the US
Don't know what you're basing your opinion on, but listen to the experts.

China is building its capability, however, and will be a threat at some point. Unfortunately, much of their advance is due to their successful espionage efforts against the USA.

I am a friend to the Chinese people but their government can stuff it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. I disagree....
The only thing the states could do is nuke'em, they would other wise have their asses handed to'em. The population numbers make that apparently clear

Plus, we obviously can not seem to be able to exist without them since we import everything from them and export basically nothing. A head on collision with China would be disastrous for the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boricua79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. neither can win against each other
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 07:57 AM by boricua79
The Chinese have nukes too. In the event of a real, all-out war between China and the U.S., both nations would be destroyed. They also have advanced missiles and do not need to match the U.S. in Naval power. Their airforce and Sunburn/Yakohntz missiles would be more than enough to match our fleet. If a conflict occurs, it won't be here in North America, it will be in Asia, where supply lines favor the Chinese. The only way to get to China, by air, sea, or land, is to mass a major invasion force on one of its coasts, since going through Middle Asia through the Middle East is not going to happen. Not only would this not happen (because the Chinese wouldn't just let us amass a force near them), but even if we got on land, we'd be facing the largest Army in the world. 7 MILLION PLA members, with at least 2.3 million Standing army (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Liberation_Army).

And if we decide to take airstrikes against them, in order for our planes to reach their targets, we'd have to get close enough to get within range of their anti-ship missiles. Our planes would undoubtedly be either land or sea based, and either would be susceptible to counterattack. Any sea based plane would need a carrier that would be vulnerable to Chinese Sunburn, Exocets, and Yahkontz missiles, and any land based airport in a "friendly" country would be susceptible to conventional and nuclear missiles from China. I doubt any "friendly" nation would authorize their nation as a source of American attacks...which pretty much leaves only a naval-launch option.

They could also retaliate by refusing to fund our debt, refusing to allow products made in China to be sold in the U.S., etc. sure, this would hurt China...but our economy would tank...making this consequence a consideration to take into account before we strike.

I'm sure in any conflict, both nations would suffer greatly. The U.S. has no military option with China. It would be inviting military and economic retaliation that would cripple the U.S.

If we had a "military option", we would have exercised it during the Hainan Affair. Instead, the Hainan issue was the first "test" of a conflict between China and the U.S. The result: the U.S. was forced, through Colin Powell, to give an apology for the incident. In fact, the U.S. didn't want to apologize, and instead sent letters with "VERY SORRY" in them. The Chinese made them say "VERY SORRY" instead of a bland apology (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20010412/ai_n14381202)

and the Chinese returned the airplane...in PIECES...after thorougly investigating it for technological research. (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WDQ/is_2001_July_9/ai_76664467)

In other words...they did what they WANTED to do...and we couldn't do ANYTHING.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. About Hainan
The US was not about to go to war over this incident. There was nothing we could do short of demand the safe return of crew and property, which we got, IIRC.

You seem to have forgotten Japan in your calculation of supply lines and air bases. I am pretty sure that the Pacific would not come under Chinese control; I am confident that the US Navy has anti-submarine war against the Chinese sufficiently gamed to ensure the best possibility for a win.

I am not sure that China would remain stable for very long if she were to go to war for any sufficient period of time. I also think you over-estimate the value of sheer numbers of troops.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. Not in a conventional war perhaps..
but something tells me that when and if the U.S. and China go to war, it will not be by conventional means. I think we're headed toward a cold war with them as we speak, and after the Beijing Olympics are over, all bets are off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. It is called building a modern military to rival America's fleet.
WTF top commander of US blah blah!? Are you THAT stupid? Oh yeah, it is also called 'doing whatever the fuck we want because WE OWN YOUR COUNTRY'! China will rival us in a few years, maybe we shouldn't have sold our economic soul!

Stupid is as stupid does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
18. Isn't diplomacy the job of the State Department? Or Bush himself?
An admiral should be leading his fleet. Not doing Condi's job for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. US: over 500B/yr on military shit (actually closer to 800B)
China: around 50B.

I wonder why we think the Chinese can't build any damn thing they want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. "This is totally bitchin." - Marvelous Marvin Bush & Neil Silverado Bush
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 07:36 AM by SpiralHawk
"We republicon crones are making Beaucoup Profits dealing with (SMIRK) the 'godless red commies in China. Smirk."

- Corrupt Bush brothers, BFEE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Poppy brought western capitalism to China..
not to the people of China mind you, just to the military and the party leaders. China's military is bought and paid for by the American people. Nice, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
24. "Area denial weapons"
How many Megatons is the threshold for that description?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
25. Really? Too bad we're completely dependent on China for so many things now.
My husband's company has a new goal to get their China outsourcing up to 60%. If they had to choose between pulling all operations out of the U.S. or out of China, I bet they'd pull out of the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
27. But the * policy of pissing away America's military might isn't worrisome?
I foresee hard lessons ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psst_Im_Not_Here Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
28. Funny story
My husband is in upper management for a retail outfit. He rarely gets to interact with customers anymore but when he does, it can be entertaining. The other day was such an occasion. He saw an older gentleman looking at some workboots and the guy says, "If we ever go to war with China, your company is screwed!" referring to the fact that most shoes are made in China or some other asian country.

My husband quickly responded, "Sir, if we ever go to war with China, we're ALL screwed!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
30. He'd better worry more about China's stranglehold over our economy
China could sink our economy just by leaking they plan to sell a fraction of the $600 billion in U.S. Treasury notes and bonds they hold.

Look what happened when South Korea leaked a couple of years ago that they were going to diversify. The stock market dropped 300 points in one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC