Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge suspects CIA duped court in destroying tapes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:15 PM
Original message
Judge suspects CIA duped court in destroying tapes
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 06:30 PM by cal04
Source: Reuters

A U.S. judge deciding if the CIA should be held in contempt for destroying video tapes of interrogations of suspected Islamist militants said on Thursday he believed the court had been deceived by the agency.

U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein was responding to arguments by the American Civil Liberties Union, which accused the Central Intelligence Agency of flouting a court order by destroying the tapes after Freedom of Information Act requests filed by the ACLU in 2003 and 2004.

Hellerstein said he found it "hard to believe" the tapes did not produce any notes or markers that could have been turned over. Government lawyers argued that the videotapes were the subject of a CIA "special review" of the detention program, not an investigation, and were therefore held in operational files not included in the court order.

"If there are hundreds of hours of videotape it's inconceivable to me that someone doing a special review or investigation of what is going on would not make a summary," Hellerstein said in Manhattan federal court.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080117/pl_nm/security_cia_hearing_dc



Judge Chides CIA on Interrogation Tape
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7235146,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. CIA does anything it wants
I hope the judge watches his back, CIA is evil :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Aw come on, would the CIA lie about something like this? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. CIA isn't autonomous
'it' obeys it's masters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. But Who Are the Masters of the CIA?
That has never been clear...is Poppy still able to pull strings, or has his idiot son cut them all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleOfNah Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Even the CIA doesn't know.
Remember, sources and methods are secrets.

Now that intelligence has been outsourced, does that mean the secret budgets are still secret? Private groups are handling the most critical information of a Nation, and we can't even know how much we are paying them, directly or indirectly (ops)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. that is the burning question!
certainly John Tenet didn't have much say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. The CIA violated your order, "deceived" you, and so . . . ?
Does Judge Hellerstein really need to deliberate on this one? Start locking people up. About 13 months from now, you're going to hear constant bleating about the "rule of law," and these sorts of shenanigans will be conveniently forgotten as the slumbering pound puppies of the media wake up and finally do their jobs again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. I believe Hellerstein is the same judge that ordered the release of the Abu Ghraib torture photos.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Ervin jret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hold the cia in contempt? Don't you need a person like the head of the cia who says "not me. it was...
x y and z" and then x y and z say "not me it was......" and then we get an investigation ? How how does something like this work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. CIA Faulted for Destruction of Interrogation Videotapes..judge to focus on a remedy not contempt
CIA Faulted for Destruction of Interrogation Videotapes
Friday January 18, 3:02 am ET
Mark Hamblett, New York Law Journal


A federal judge will not hold the CIA in civil contempt for the 2005 destruction of videotapes of the interrogation of high level al-Qaida detainees -- but only because it would not do any good.

Southern District of New York Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein expressed disgust Thursday over the destruction of the tapes, which he said likely violated his own September 2004 order to preserve information in a case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union under the Freedom of Information Act.

~snip~

During a hearing in lower Manhattan, however, Hellerstein said it would serve no purpose to hold the agency in contempt, other than to create "a newspaper headline."

Instead, he said, he would focus on a remedy, one that might include requiring current and former CIA personnel and other government officials who had seen the tapes to produce any written notes or summaries.

The judge also raised the possibility of issuing subpoenas if necessary to former agency personnel to secure their testimony.

more:http://biz.yahoo.com/law/080118/0beac4e327cf92f5f9a06a799c514098.html?.v=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Meanwhile, the GOP Media Establishment is basically telling people to: Look over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC