Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientist unveils man-made genome, key to creating life from scratch

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:57 PM
Original message
Scientist unveils man-made genome, key to creating life from scratch
Source: San Jose Mercury News

Gene pioneer Craig Venter has unveiled the world's first man-made genome, setting the stage for a profound milestone: the creation of life from scratch.

The feat, described online Thursday in the journal Science, was accomplished by making DNA fragments from lab chemicals and then assembling them inside a cell.

The synthetic genome contains all the instructions that an organism - in this case, a tiny bacterium called Mycoplasma genitalium - needs to live and reproduce.

The ability to synthesize life, such as biofuels, could help solve one of mankind's biggest problems: a sustainable energy supply. But it could also be used to construct bioweapons, such as smallpox.

Read more: http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8067485
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kill It Before It Multiplies!
(Didn't any of you ever watch the show?--Guy, the Red-Shirt from "Galaxy Quest") He's on the left.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. LOL, love that movie
Did you notice Dwight (from The Office) was one of the Aliens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I Didn't Even Know Who Alan Rickman Was, Back Then
The aliens were a fabulous ensemble, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'll quote Sting
"I never saw no miracle of science
That didn't go from a blessing to a curse..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Don't quote Sting.
If he believes that, then he's an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Bwahahahaha
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Ah yes, what a curse it is...
that it's now an unexpected tragedy, instead of a routine event, if a child dies before reaching adolescence.

Damn that evil horrible science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ooooh
Time to make laws against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. So when do we become God?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobTheSubgenius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I submit....
...that it was when 'we' developed the power to end all life on the planet. This is just another milestone, in a way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. hopefully soon
this rocks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Venter in 20 years will be exalted as the Einstein of genomics.
Venter, from what I've heard, can be a son-of-a-bitch, but all agree that he is scary smart and visionary. I only hope that he at least has the humility to read Shelly's Frankenstein every once in a while.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is actually exciting
it will be interesting to see if they can "boot up" the organism they design -- I wonder if they also put a bunch of "junk DNA" into their sequence, and if they didn't, whether it's absence will have any effect?

Now, what would really impress me is if they could write a whole new genome from scratch -- hah. All they are really doing is copying the instructions that they have decoded - like copying and pasting paragraphs from different books to make a new book -- they aren't actually writing a whole new story (although it will read like one).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. So far they design nothing. They make a DNA strand from building blocks in a lab, but
the information contain therein is that of an existing bacterium. As usual, this is greatly hyped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. By "design" I mean which genes they choose to include
Each gene has many variants, and I imagine that what they are doing is like building with Legos -- they follow a blueprint but the individual bricks can be different colors.

But then, I haven't read the paper so I really don't know the details of what they're doing -- just know where this is leading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. Link to Venter's institute press release
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. Bisquick is more convenient
Easier to clean up after, too.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. I met Venter a few years ago

after he gave a presentation at the research facility where I was based. The work he did with the Human Genome Project was brilliant, but I really, really did not like what he was talking about when he announced his plans to do this and similar (Moreau-Frankenstein) genetic science.

I admit that the profit angle somewhat bothered me -- if my scientific background was in biotech I'd probably be less leery of the idea of such scientists raking in big bucks from genetic patents and the like -- but I just really didn't like the way he spoke and what I picked up on as arrogant and somewhat megalomaniacal vibes (during the talk and afterward). The idea just seemed to me one that was inherently a Bad Idea...I mean, generations of monster movies and Jeff Goldblum's character from Jurassic Park, alone, would seem to suggest that mad (or profit/glory-seeking) scientists creating life is fundamentally Not A Good Thing. I don't know if there is a God, but I damn sure know that Craig Venter shouldn't be playing the part.

Count me as one against the whole idea. Something is going to go wrong. Nature, as they say, will find a way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I tend to agree - The Law of Unintended Consequences can be rather harsh
The level of complexity involved with this sort of endeavour make it almost certain that unexpected things will happen. That makes me very nervous, and I'm the sort of guy who doesn't mind nuclear power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. not a good day for the pope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. Let us always remember K. planticola, the one that almost got away
Here's a perfect example of the Law of Unintended Consequences in action in genetic engineering. We take you back to 1992:

http://www.safe2use.com/ca-ipm/01-02-05-study.htm

Field burning of plant residues to prevent disease is a serious cause of air pollution throughout the US. If we had an organism that could decompose the plant material and produce alcohol from it; then we'd have a win-win situation. A sellable product and get rid of plant residues without burning. We could add it to gasoline. We could cook with it. We could drink grass wine-although whether that would taste very good is anyone's guess. Regardless, there are many uses for alcohol.

So, genes were taken out of another bacterium, and put into Klebsiella-planticola in the right place to result in alcohol production. Once that was done, the plan was to rake the plant residue from the fields, gather it into containers, and allow it to be decomposed by Klebsiella-planticola. But, Klebsiella would produce alcohol, which it normally does not do. The alcohol production would be performed in a bucket in the barn. But what would you do with the sludge left at the bottom of the bucket once the plant material was decomposed? Think about a wine barrel or beer barrel after the wine or beer has been produced? There is a good thick layer of sludge left at the bottom. After Klebsiella-planticola has decomposed plant material, the sludge left at the bottom would be high in nitrogen and phosphorus and sulfur and magnesium and calcium-all of those materials that make a perfectly wonderful fertilizer. This material could be spread as a fertilizer then, and there wouldn't be a waste product in this system at all. A win-win-win situation.

But my colleagues and I asked the question: What is the effect of the sludge when put on fields? Would it contain live Klebsiella-planticola engineered to produce alcohol? Yes, it would. Once the sludge was spread it onto fields in the form of fertilizer, would the Klebsiella-planticola get into root systems? Would it have an effect on ecological balance; on the biological integrity of the ecosystem; or on the agricultural soil that the fertilizer would be spread on?

One of the experiments that Michael Holmes did for his Ph.D. work was to bring typical agricultural soil into the lab, sieve it so it was nice and uniform, and place it in small containers. We tested it to make sure it had not lost any of the typical soil organisms, and indeed, we found a very typical soil food web present in the soil. We divided up the soil into pint-size Mason jars, added a sterile wheat seedling in every jar, and made certain that each jar was the same as all the jars.

Into a third of the jars we just added water. Into another third of the jars, the not-engineered Klebsiella-planticola, the parent organism, was added. Into a final third of the jars, the genetically engineered microorganism was added.

The wheat plants grew quite well in the Mason jars in the laboratory incubator, until about a week after we started the experiment. We came into the laboratory one morning, opened up the incubator and went, "Oh my God, some of the plants are dead. What's gone wrong? What did we do wrong?" We started removing the Mason jars from the incubator. When we were done splitting up the Mason jars, we found that every one of the genetically engineered plants in the Mason jars was dead. Wheat with the parent bacterium, the normal bacterium, was alive and growing well. Wheat plants in the water-only treatment were alive and growing well.

From that experiment, we might suspect that there's a problem with this genetically engineered microorganism. The logical extrapolation from this experiment is to suggest that it is possible to make a genetically engineered microorganism that would kill all terrestrial plants. Since Klebsiella-planticola is in the root system of all terrestrial plants, presumably all terrestrial plants would be at risk.

So what does Klebsiella-planticola do in root systems? The parent bacterium makes a slime layer that helps it stick to the plant's roots. The engineered bacterium makes about 17 parts per million alcohol. What is the level of alcohol that is toxic to roots? About one part per million. The engineered bacterium makes the plants drunk, and kills them.

But I am not trying to say that all genetically engineered organisms are technological terrors. What I am saying is that we have to test each and every genetically engineered organism and make sure that it really does not have unexpected, unpredicted effects.

Craig Venter is a classic example of the "clever monkey" syndrome that afflicts Homo "sapiens": intelligence without wisdom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC