Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study: Afghanistan could fail as a state

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:52 PM
Original message
Study: Afghanistan could fail as a state
Source: Associated Press

Study: Afghanistan could fail as a state

By ANNE FLAHERTY, Associated Press Writer
2 hours, 10 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Afghanistan risks sliding into a failed
state and becoming the "forgotten war" because of
deteriorating international support and a growing violent
insurgency, according to an independent study.

The assessment, co-chaired by retired Marine Corps Gen.
James Jones and former U.N. Ambassador Thomas
Pickering, serves as a warning to the Bush administration
at a time military and congressional officials are
debating how best to juggle stretched warfighting
resources.

The administration wants to re-energize anti-terrorism
efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where al-Qaida is
regenerating. But the U.S. still remains heavily invested
in Iraq, and officials are sending strong signals that
troop reductions there will slow or stop altogether this
summer.

"Afghanistan stands at a crossroads," concludes the
study, an advance copy of which was obtained by The
Associated Press. "The progress achieved after six years
of international engagement is under serious threat from
resurgent violence, weakening international resolve,
mounting regional challenges and a growing lack of
confidence on the part of the Afghan people about the
future direction of their country."

-snip-

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080129/ap_on_go_ot/us_afghanistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. considering Bush continues to lie about it and the MSM hardly says
anything..I agree. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm pretty sure the 'could' ship sailed away a long time ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, what do they know?
Little Arfin Annie says things are going swimmingly in Afghanistan, and who would know better than someone who bears a startling resemblance to an Afghan hound?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Goodness, are your sure? They were doing so well. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Didn't Bush say that things are going swell in Afghanistan
during his SOTU Monday night?

So, why didn't the talking heads take Bush to task during the post-address analysis?

Can't trust that damn liberal media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, he said
things in afganistan were going so well he's going to send in an additional 3200 troops. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. File this under 'no shit sherlock' (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. It already has failed
Karzai has always been nothing more than the mayor of Kabul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Could???
I think the writer needs a refresher course in the correct use of tenses. Conditional is for something iffy; past tense is used for something that has already happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. What is incredibly & deeply astounding is the use of the word
"could".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. But, but .. poppy sales are up! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC