Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British soldier's widow releases damning Iraq tape

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:29 PM
Original message
British soldier's widow releases damning Iraq tape
The widow of a British soldier shot dead in Iraq while not wearing a flak jacket has just released an audio tape made by her husband.

On it, he complains about the lack of proper equipment they had been issued for battle.

Sergeant Stephen Roberts made the tape the night before he died.

Samantha Roberts says she has released her husband's audio diary because she wants the truth to come out.

"He had to give up his personal flak jacket to infantry soldiers because there were not enough to go around," she said.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1026509.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnnabelLee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can see the Blathering Blair in my mind's eye
during Prime Minister's Questions, spewing that old platitude that the British military is the best-trained, best-equipped force in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is tragic
and should be getting media coverage in this country...

Our troops still don't have proper equipment, but billions are being spent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supormom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. As the wife of an Army Nat'l Guard officer...
I find these kind of stories to be truly disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. my dad is already trying to pin the flak-jacket shortage on Clinton...
Edited on Thu Jan-15-04 09:34 PM by arcane1
:evilfrown:


apparently it takes THREE YEARS before abything Bush does has any effect. Clinton didn't send those people into war without proper protection, and if he "decimated" the military so badly, then what bold, noble steps did George take since Jan 01 to correct this problem? As far as I know he didn't do one damned thing...

on edit- there is a terrible irony to this story at the end:

"Mrs Roberts also says the Ministry of Defence has confirmed her husband was killed by friendly fire."

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ask your dad...
that if the military was so underprepared for war, then WHY DID BUSH SEND THEM IN? We now have PROOF that Saddam Hussein wasn't an imminent threat - this just makes * look even more incompetent.

And will your dad vote for Bush, so that he can send more "unprepared" soldiers to die in Syria and Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CompXDog Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Imminent Threat?
Yeah! But nobody claimed that there was an imminent threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Pardon? Nobody claimed what?
Nobody claimed Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat? Go back and review the State of the Union speech, friend, and most of the admin's public statements four months prior to that. You'll find many such claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CompXDog Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Looking
I am searching Google, could point me to a specific document?

The State of the Union address includes that Saddam is "not an imminent threat" not just "an imminent threat"

Could you cite an actual location?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The Dick-Head in Chief said
that we had better get Saddam before he gets us - we don't want the first warning to be a "musroom cloud". Remember that? His lapdog Conti said the same thing. Without "imminent threat" the invasion was illegal, even by you and your's definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. AWOL May Not Have Said "Imminent" Only Because He Can't Pronounce It
but he led the american people to believe that saddam hussein was going to use his "weapons of mass destruction" against the united states of america any day. dickhead cheney declared on meet the press that he knew "for sure" that hussein had a nuclear weapons program and thus, we "had" to go to war.

you can play word games all you want, but the intent of AWOL and his lying administration was to give the american people reason to believe that if we didn't go to war with Iraq when we did then saddam hussein was going to kill us all.

keep lying to yourself, buddy.. but that doesn't make AWOL's lies become truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supormom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. "Only Because He Can't Pronounce It"
lol !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Try This
Bush's October 2002 speech in Cincinnati

How anyone could walk away NOT thinking that Iraq poses a serious and immediate danger to this country.

But I'm sure your response would be "well Clinton said it too!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. You parse words better than Big Dog Bill.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. rush tell you to say that?
use your own brain, man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. no they claimed it was WORSE than an imminent threat
but dittoheads are immune to logic and facts, so why do I bother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guajira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. How many Times did B* say Saddam and 9-11 in the same breath???
Seems like every speech he said things like: we have to get rid of Saddam - we don't want another 9-11.

Ditto heads who never think for themselves would have no problem thinking there was a connection between Saddam and 9-11.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. But the Pentagon awarded giant bloated contracts to GOP
donors. Plenty of money for that! There was lots of money to be spent but Bush was too busy campaigning to care and Rumsfeld is simply insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Except Clinton didn't send anyone into war.
He was bright enough to use his considerable diplomatic skills to get American interests and objectives sucessfully furthered in the forum of international opinion.....

Of course, Bill was not beholden to corporate oil interests and a Party of corrupted war-profiteers and he understood that the blood of Americans should not be shed to satisfy the profits of these special interest groups.

Besides, since we know that Cheney/Bush had been planning their war since the minute that stole office, is your dad saying that flak jackets couldn't be ordered, produced, and shipped in 2 years?

Nah, they just don't really give a shit about the soldiers...they do give a shit about selling out our country and funneling our tax dollars to companies like Halliburton and the Carlyle Group, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Correction.
He did send troops to Kosovo...but, in 8 years, he never lost a soldier that he had ordered into battle. Lucky or did he make their safety a priority? Probably a combination of both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demconfive Donating Member (578 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. So ask your dad...
What exactly did the military buy with 1.2 trillion dollars over the last 3 years? Nobody in the Pentagon checked on flak jacket supplies for three whole years?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. they lost
track of $2.3 trillion - that would have bought quite a bit of protective gear -

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml

LOS ANGELES, Jan. 29, 2002

(CBS) On Sept. 10, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war. Not on foreign terrorists, "the adversary's closer to home. It's the Pentagon bureaucracy," he said.

He said money wasted by the military poses a serious threat.

<snip>

"According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted.

$2.3 trillion — that's $8,000 for every man, woman and child in America. To understand how the Pentagon can lose track of trillions, consider the case of one military accountant who tried to find out what happened to a mere $300 million.

"We know it's gone. But we don't know what they spent it on," said Jim Minnery, Defense Finance and Accounting Service.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's a prediction
Edited on Thu Jan-15-04 09:34 PM by sasquatch
American Media won't cover it!!

Our media is too concentrated on Kobe Bryant's penis and not enough on our troops lives.:argh:

on edit forgot to put<'>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh, yes, the "troops" are being supported
at the government level, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildwww2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. The troops are supported. They have to be carried to their bodybags.
By their fellow servicemen don`t they? That sure seems to be the level of our governments support. Do it yourself support and we will get the oil out. Thank you for your life. Your served your countries pre-emptive war bravely.
Peace
Wildman
Al Gore is My President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. My stepson took his own helmet and Kevlar vest with him
we made sure of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDalaiMama Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. God...the wealthiest, most powerful nation on earth and your stepson
had to take his own helmet and vest. There are no words to explain how that makes me feel.

I'm sorry he has to be in such a mickey mouse army..with mickey mouse as commander in chief...and I wish him a short tour and safe return.


dalai
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IowaBiker Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
26. Just remember ...
Those aren't rich Republican trust fund babies out there in the desert. There is no reason for Bush to protect them.

The news I've been getting from the solders on front on how this war is being conducted is very disturbing.

--Brian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
28. Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC