Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prosecutors: Wilkes Faked Poverty to Get Gov-Funded Lawyers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 02:27 PM
Original message
Prosecutors: Wilkes Faked Poverty to Get Gov-Funded Lawyers
Edited on Tue Feb-05-08 02:30 PM by calipendence
Source: TPM Muckraker

By Paul Kiel - February 5, 2008, 11:58AM



When it rains, it pours.

Brent Wilkes was convicted in November on all counts for bribing Duke Cunningham. And a probation officer has advised the court that he should get 60 years in prison for it.

But he's still got another trial to go -- one for bribing his longtime buddy Dusty Foggo when he was executive director of the CIA. For that trial, he's represented by a couple of public defenders, because his very expensive celebrity lawyer Mark Geragos refused to undergo the necessary security clearance and so was tossed off the case. Wilkes, once flush with government contracts, pleaded poverty and so the court assigned him public defenders.

But prosecutors say it was all an act by a man who's already been convicted once of thieving from taxpayers:

Wilkes got the taxpayer-funded lawyers appointed in August.... He submitted a financial affidavit under seal to Burns to show he could not afford his own lawyers.

(Judge Larry) Burns made the appointment provisional, meaning it could be withdrawn if prosecutors came up with information showing Wilkes could fund his own defense.

...



Read more: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/prosecutors_wilkes_faked_pover.php



Hmm... I originally wondered why he was pleading for a public defender, and then wound up with Geragos, AFTER Geragos earlier complained about getting a security clearance. Interesting. Now it sounds like this is the trial where there perhaps is "interesting" stuff that reflects badly on the "State Secrets" gang in Washington! The other was more of the "public show" to take the visibility away from this coming case I think.

As noted in another thread I started yesterday, John Michael, Thomas Kontogiannis's nephew who was also charged along with Wilkes and Dusty Foggo when Carol Lam left office plead guilty to money laundering yesterday. There still is a mound of excrement that still needs to be cleared away here I think!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3169442&mesg_id=3169442
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. For all their B.S. about "welfare queens" etc.
these guys always seem to be first at the public trough when it suits their needs. I wish I knew where I could get the figures for Conservatives who pig out at the publics' expense, and who are the first to file "frivolous" lawsuits when it's they who are wronged. :eyes:

The hypocrisy of these turds is astounding. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. A man convicted for bribery lied about his assets?
Inconceivable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC