Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. seeks enhanced financial authority for Fed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 02:41 AM
Original message
U.S. seeks enhanced financial authority for Fed
Source: Reuters via Yahoo

The U.S. Treasury Department will propose on Monday that the Federal Reserve be given sweeping new powers that would make it chief regulator with authority to require actions to ensure market stability.
An executive summary of the proposals published by the New York Times, which Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson will make public on Monday when he unveils a blueprint for regulatory overhaul, says it is vital to fix "regulatory gaps and redundancies" exposed by an ongoing subprime mortgage crisis...The proposals say a "market stability regulator" is needed and the Fed best fits that role, suggesting the central bank could use its control over interest rates as well as its ability to provide market liquidity to fulfill its functions.

It proposes that the Fed be given broad authority to require information from all participants in financial markets and a right to collaborate with other regulators in writing the rules that companies and institutions must follow. If the Fed finds that the actions of some market participants pose risks for the overall financial system or the economy, "the Federal Reserve should have authority to require corrective action to address current risks or to constrain future risk-taking," the summary said.
Among other recommendations, Treasury suggests merging the Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.S. markets watchdog, with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission that oversees the activities of the futures market...It also recommends getting rid of a Depression-era charter for thrifts that was intended to make it easier to obtain mortgage loans, saying it is no longer necessary. That would mean closing up the Office of Thrift Supervision and transferring its duties to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency that oversees national banks.

Treasury said it has been working on its proposals since March last year, well before calls for an overhaul began to intensify in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis that began to wreak havoc last summer on financial markets. Paulson had signaled some of the direction the proposals would take earlier this week when he said that since the Fed had taken the exceptional step of permitting investment banks access to its discount window for loans -- the first time it has done so for any financial entities besides commercial banks since the 1930s -- it should have some authority over the investment banks...
Another proposal would provide an option for insurance companies to obtain a charter to do business under federal regulation, though it says the current state-based system would continue for any that did not get a federal charter. Most of the financial services industry in the United States is regulated by federal authorities except insurance, which the states supervise. For years, big insurance companies, however, have been calling for an optional federal charter...

Many analysts and some Treasury officials have said they don't expect recommendations made during the current administration to become law but hope it will be used a springboard for the next resident of the White House.

(Reporting by John Poirier and Glenn Somerville; Editing by Louise Heavens)



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080329/bs_nm/usa_economy_regulation_dc_4



Such a scheme wouldn't have stopped any of the institutions that started this crisis in the first place, so it's more window dressing and/or power grab than a solution.

The solution would be to reinstate all the regulation that came out of the Great Depression and protected the economy and the people, until Reagan started the process of undoing it all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is the major shit I was talking about tonight
Thanks, that you reported the story
But I think even the news outlets
don't even understand the implications yet.


They broke the law with the $100 billion payout
to a fricking INVESTMENT FIRM.......not a bank today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, The News Outlets Are Easily Confused by Facts
so they tend to ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. "In matters such as this, facts are, um, inconvenient." - Corporate media toadies
"So move along. There is nothing to see here. You can rest easy knowing that the FED loves you, and will take care of you. Smirk."

- republicon-borg corporate media dumplets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. and for all these additional Hundreds of Billions of taxpayer backed dollars
the tax payers can expect what value or service?

Under the bushc - there is now a complete disconnect between the idea that taxpayer dollars should be spent to the benefit of tax payers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Very good point. When FDR taxed the people to build the New
Deal we got REA, CCCamp projects which we still use, hydroelectric damns, and much more. What are we the people getting out of any of the last 8 years of governance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyeontheprize Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. Friday news dump meets Shock Doctrine
If the Democrats gave two shits about the country they would fight this until the last dog died. But they'll allow it.

We are all fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alaskanwarrior Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Authority
It's interesting if you look at it from the context of having a class about Marxism last year and then applying the concepts of distribution of capital, wealth and such to include government intervention in the market. I think this is one case or another that the US has just given into every whim of the bankers. Oh I just also realized that the federal reserve is only as governmental as federal express - they hint at it in here; "risk taking...future risks"

Is that why there was variable interest loans to reward them for taking a risk? Interesting that it's done with a compounding interest rates i.e what you can sell your self for. Some how it's justified to make money off of the would be home debaters and that in taking that risk the bankers ought to make money for even bothering.

I wonder what the completive nature of capitalism will have to bring about in this segment in the human story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't like the idea of a private bank doing the work of a government agency.
Shouldn't the Treasury be working on regulations and reform, not the Fed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. BINGO!!!
In these days of privatization and outsourcing, you get what you deserve by some corporate greedy model, not what you need, and not what you paid for, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. giving the PPT greater leeway is part of this plan
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 04:32 AM by UpInArms
:scared:

FACTBOX: Treasury proposals for regulatory overhaul

*President's Working Group should have better inter-agency coordination and communication to mitigate systemic risk to the financial system, enhance financial market integrity, promote consumer and investor protection, and support capital markets efficiency and competitiveness

*PWG should be expanded to include the heads of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS)

*Creation of a new federal commission called the Mortgage Origination Commission (MOC). Its presidentially appointed director would chair a board comprising of the Federal Reserve, OCC, OTS, FDIC, National Credit Union Administration, and Conference of State Bank Supervisors

*MOC would set licensing standards for state mortgage market participants to address personal conduct, disciplinary history, educational requirements, and it would evaluate each state's system for licensing and regulation of participants in the mortgage origination process

*Fed would retain authority to draft regulations for national mortgage lending laws but enforcement authority for federal laws should be clarified and enhanced

*Appropriate conditions should be attached to temporary lending from Fed when market stability is threatened and Fed should have information through on-site examination or other means

*PWG should consider broader regulatory issues associated with providing discount window access to non-depository institutions


here's what the "Working Group" aka PPT (Plunge Protection Team) sprang from:

Executive Order 12631--Working Group on Financial Markets

Source: The provisions of Executive Order 12631 of Mar. 18, 1988, appear at 53 FR 9421, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 559, unless otherwise noted.

By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish a Working Group on Financial Markets, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Establishment. (a) There is hereby established a Working Group on Financial Markets (Working Group). The Working Group shall be composed of:
(1) the Secretary of the Treasury, or his designee;
(2) the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or his designee;
(3) the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or his designee; and
(4) the Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or her designee.
(b) The Secretary of the Treasury, or his designee, shall be the Chairman of the Working Group.
Sec. 2. Purposes and Functions. (a) Recognizing the goals of enhancing the integrity, efficiency, orderliness, and competitiveness of our Nation's financial markets and maintaining investor confidence, the Working Group shall identify and consider:
(1) the major issues raised by the numerous studies on the events in the financial markets surrounding October 19, 1987, and any of those recommendations that have the potential to achieve the goals noted above; and
(2) the actions, including governmental actions under existing laws and regulations (such as policy coordination and contingency planning), that are appropriate to carry out these recommendations.
(b) The Working Group shall consult, as appropriate, with representatives of the various exchanges, clearinghouses, self-regulatory bodies, and with major market participants to determine private sector solutions wherever possible.
(c) The Working Group shall report to the President initially within 60 days (and periodically thereafter) on its progress and, if appropriate, its views on any recommended legislative changes.

Sec. 3. Administration. (a) The heads of Executive departments, agencies, and independent instrumentalities shall, to the extent permitted by law, provide the Working Group such information as it may require for the purpose of carrying out this Order.
(b) Members of the Working Group shall serve without additional compensation for their work on the Working Group.
(c) To the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of funds therefore, the Department of the Treasury shall provide the Working Group with such administrative and support services as may be necessary for the performance of its functions.


here's an article that gives a glimpse of what TPTB and the PPT did after 9/11

Preventing the 'plunge'

A high-level committee behind the scenes fought against market meltdown

The dramatic drop in the markets last week could have been much worse if it hadn't been for a shadowy committee of some of the biggest names in banking.

Analysts say the Working Group on Financial Markets, nicknamed the 'Plunge Protection Team', was extremely successful in helping co-ordinate a response across the markets when they reopened last Monday.

The team was set up in the late Eighties by Ronald Reagan and came into its own in 1998 when it drew up an emergency response in the wake of the collapse of the giant hedge fund, Long Term Capital Management. In the past it has comprised Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, US Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, the heads of the various US stock exchanges and the bosses of a handful of leading investment banks.

However, this time around no fewer than 35 individuals - including representatives of other central banks - are thought to have been in the team.

The challenge was to agree on how to react to the events. Harmony was in danger of being jeopardised when the members representing investment banks clashed with those representing the stock exchanges, who wanted an early resumption to trading. The banks, for their parts, were concerned that staff and infrastructure were too battered to resume in the same week as the attacks.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. A good rule-of-thumb : If George W. Bush is pimping it, it is BAD for America.
RESIST!!!:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BB1 Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Resistance is futile
You will be assimilated.

Run while you can! Apply for polical asylum! (and don't forget to convert your $$$ to euros first...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Another scheme to privatize profit and socialize risk
There has been too much privatization and deregulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ha-ha.
Here that sound? It's the sound of the free market balloon deflating. What gets me is that all those brilliant minds in Wall Street never anticipated that greed would get in the way of a fair free market process, or worse, that they thought greed was a good human motivator to make free market work.

Now, either they were wilfully stupid, or just good con men?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. There Are NO Free Markets!
There never were, not since 1913. And this just makes sure that there won't ever be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. The only part that confuses me is the Chinatown syndrome.
Isn't the Federal Reserve a private bank? In which case, giving them more power isn't exactly like government regulation of the markets, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Wonderfully put . .. !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. That's The Whole Point, Isn't It?
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 01:43 PM by Demeter
Going from benign neglect by the government right into crony politics--rewarding the foxes with the henhouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. Another example of Bush and his band of fools....
... responding to a crisis with the worst possible proposal.

The FED (Alan Idiot Greenspan) is largely responsible for this mess. The SEC also, but the FED was the facilitator, dumping billions into the economy in the form of housing loans.

Well, now all that can be done (or I should say all they are going to do) is print billions to bail out all of the bad actors.

The taxpayers will foot the bill in the form of an even weaker dollar and high inflation.

As usual, it is heads they win, tails we lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. BUSH seeks authority, not the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. The sheep have been disappearing, so he's giving the shepherd's job to the wolves.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Good analogy
That's exactly what this Admin has been doing, not just this time but with every government function.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bingo!
"The solution would be to reinstate all the regulation that came out of the Great Depression and protected the economy and the people, until Reagan started the process of undoing it all!"

This is EXACTLY what I yelled at my monitor when I read the story on a news site this morning.

Reinstate ALL the laws that were summarily tossed aside over the past 25+ years. Why friggin' reinvent the wheel? They HAVE the text of this legislation. Repeal the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (which thanks to this, my primary bank that was originally established in the 1700s, is now on its 3rd out-of-state corporate owner) and reinstate and modernize the Glass-Steagall Act. Keep the commercial consumer banking the hell away from the speculative investment banking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gonnuts Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. Insanity
Instead of giving the Fed more we should be abolishing it.

It is simply amassing how brazen bush&co are. Right in the mist of an economic collapse basically orchestrated by the Fed he announces rewarding them for their failure.

Reminds me of Brenner and Tenet getting a Medal of Freedom for their screw-ups. This is truly an Alice in Wonderland administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
21. Say NO to Bush forming a new federal agency....
If Bernake needs to look at the banks books, give him TEMPORY power. three months is all he needs. I hope the Dems don't fall for this. Look at the homeland security diaster. All they were suppose to do was exchange info between the intel agencies. Now they've become a monster. NO MORE!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. Why not the SEC?
They used to be effective, before they were defunded, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
24. This looks like more privatization of our Treasury --- !!!
And no one in our "free press" giving challenge to the whole Fed vs Treasury question . . .

Let's get the printing of money back to the Treasury ---

and start making clear that we don't want a Fed interfering in matters of economic democracy!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
26. It's the SAME (fear) TACTIC as before
Wake up America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
27. So they want regulations when it is their lives that will be affected. Never
let em say regulations are bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. No, they ALL want to avoid accountability
by giving away their fiduciary responsibilities - the lot of them - executive, legislative, and judicial.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utRKKOUHA4A

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
29. Wouldn't this also give retroactive immunity to the Fed for bailing out BS?
Some part of what CNN reported about this made me think that's at least part of what the Repub plan is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Jerk Store Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
31. AAaaaaargh!!!
Every time I think I can't get any more frustrated w/ this Nazi Regime, they slink out of their scales and do something else even more heinous. Evil. Underhanded. I'm out of words. The fed is the biggest rip off in the history of this country--AND THEY'RE GIVING IT MORE POWER? Well, damn, here's my wallet, and the keys to everything why don't you greedy bastards just go on in and take everything. They won't be happy until everybody else is dead, and then they'll all look at each other and say, "Gollee, Dick, remember the good ol' days?" And Dick will have his fourty-seventh heart attack and offer W a drink. Please someone stop these pricks!!!!! :rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
33. Treasury unveils plans for regulatory shake-up
Source: FT


The Treasury Department on Monday plans to unveil a series of recommendations that would radically reshape the regulation of the US financial services industry, giving broad new powers to the Federal Reserve to tackle systemic risk.

...

The US Treasury had been working on its “blueprint” for regulatory reform since March 2007, in an effort to bolster US capital markets amid growing competition from overseas. But the continued turmoil in the financial markets added urgency to its efforts, and raised the political stakes.

...

One of the main features of Treasury’s plan, which however is unlikely to be fully implemented for several years, would give the Fed greater power to regulate financial firms such as investment banks and hedge funds, when their actions could pose a threat to the system. However, the proposal falls short of permanent regulation by the Fed of investment banks such as Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch, which some lawmakers have suggested.

A second feature of the plan, which Hank Paulson, Treasury secretary, will outline in a speech on Monday before he travels to China, involves a reduction in the role of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC would be merged with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and would take a more hands-off approach in its oversight of exchanges in favour of the CFTC’s “principles-based” self-regulation, according to the proposal.

FT



Read more: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cf318dc6-fdce-11dc-8785-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1




OK...

We are going to try something new? A "principles-based" "self-regulation" system that excludes Goldman and Lynch.

Do I need more kool-aid to understand this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. It's just another bush scam.
They are turning the management of our money over to an independent, unregulated, agency not even mentioned in the Constitution. A group of handpicked, unelected elitists want to regulate our finances. There is a reason our founding fathers put funding in the Congress and NOT in the Executive branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC