Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Group apologizes for misleading robocalls to NC voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:21 AM
Original message
Group apologizes for misleading robocalls to NC voters
Source: AP

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) -- The head of the group that provided bad information about registering to vote apologized Wednesday, saying it was using the robocalls to boost voter turnout among unmarried women.

But Attorney General Roy Cooper said Wednesday that Women's Voices, Women Vote broke the state law governing automated phone calls. No charges have been filed, but Cooper's office is seeking more information from the group.

The "calls were our sincere attempt to encourage voter registration for those not registered for the general election," group president Page Gardner said in a news release. "We apologize for any confusion our calls may have caused."

Cooper's office said the Washington, D.C.-based organization complied with a demand from state attorneys to stop the phone calls.

Some residents began receiving calls in recent days from a "Lamont Williams" who says a voter registration packet is coming in the mail and that the application should be signed and mailed back to get registered.


Read more: http://www.wavy.com/Global/story.asp?S=8254285&nav=menu45_2



A 'grassroots organization' uses a phone dialer to spread misinformation to cage votes, and all they do is apologize?? I hope they get charged to the fullest extent of the law -- this goes on way too much and when people get caught, they always get let off the hook...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. I remember getting a call in the last election
...saying it was my "union representative" telling me to remember to get out and vote on Wednesday. The day after the election. :eyes:

Should pull out their fingernails one by one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. So this was a "sincere attempt to encourage voter registration"
by telling people they could still register when the deadline was 2 weeks in the past? Of course - they're just calendrically challenged!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Too late - go directly to Jail, do not pass GO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. This group too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hysterical that you should compare....
......this incident....
The Company was reading off the Main caucas for Sunday and this has been corrected and the voter that received the incorrect date was called back...What a class act...admit mistake and correct it...Go figure

....To the other... Typical Republican Trick.
http://southernstudies.org/facingsouth/2008/04/facing-south-exclusive-dc-nonprofit.asp
FACING SOUTH EXCLUSIVE: D.C. nonprofit aimed at women voters behind deceptive N.C. robo-calls
By Chris Kromm
Facing South

Who's behind the mysterious "robo-calls" that have spread misleading voter information and sown confusion and frustration among North Carolina residents over the last week?
-----------------------------

The D.C.-based nonprofit, led by well-connected Washington operatives, claims in a press release they sent to Facing South that the North Carolina calls are part of a 24-state effort targeted at a list of 3 million voters, especially unmarried women. The robo-calls, which never mention Women's Voices, are followed by mailings that include information on how to register to vote. They plan to mail some 276,000 packets in North Carolina alone.

But since last November, in at least 11 states nationwide,
Women's Voices -- sometimes working through its Voter Participation Center project -- has developed a checkered reputation, drawing rebukes from leading election officials and complaints from thousands of would-be voters as a result of their secretive tactics, deceptive mailings and calls, and penchant for skirting or violating the law. For example:

Problems with the group's tactics have also been documented in Louisiana, Kentucky and Ohio.

In each state, the Women's Voices campaigns have brought the same news and the same themes, again and again: Deceptive claims and misrepresentations of the law -- sometimes even breaking the law. Wildly inaccurate mailing lists, supposedly aimed at "unregistered single women," but in reality reaching many registered voters as well as families, deceased persons and pets. Tactics that confuse voters and potentially disenfranchise them.
-------------------------------------------
In at least two states, the timing of Women's Voices' activities have raised alarm that they are attempting to influence the outcome of a primary. As we reported earlier, in Virginia, news reports surfaced the first week in February that prospective voters were receiving anonymous robo-calls telling voters that they were about to receive a voter registration packet in the mail.

The timing of the calls was astoundingly off: As the Virginia State Police confirm, the calls were made Feb. 5 and 6 -- about 10 days before the then-critical Virginia primary, but more than two weeks after the deadline for registering in the state had passed (Jan. 14). The Virginia State Board of Elections was deluged with calls by confused voters -- many who were already registered. When they heard the calls from Women's Voices, they feared that they really weren't.


Because of the horrible timing and their secretive nature, state officials assumed the calls and mailings were part of an identity theft scheme. When the Virginia State Police investigated, they found Women's Voices was behind them. Women's Voices was unapologetic after the controversy, merely issuing a boilerplate press release trumpeting the success of the program.

Now Women's Voices is plunging North Carolina into the same confusion. State officials tell Facing South they are still receiving calls from frustrated and confused voters, wondering why "Lamont Williams" is offering to send them a "voter registration packet" after the deadline for mail-in registration for the primaries has passed.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Women's Voices Executive Director Joe Goode worked for Bill Clinton's election campaign in 1992 as a pollster; the group's website says he was intimately involved in "development and implementation of all polling and focus groups done for the presidential primary and general election campaigns" for Clinton.


"The reports from other states are very disturbing, especially the pattern of mass confusion among targeted voters on the eve of a state's primary," Democracy North Carolina's Bob Hall tells Facing South. "These are highly skilled political operatives -- something doesn't add up. Maybe it's all well-intended and explainable. At this moment, our first priority is to stop the robo-calls and prevent the chaos and potential disenfranchisement caused by this group sending 276,000 packets of registration forms into North Carolina a few days before a heated primary election. We need their immediate cooperation."

While Hall says his group has "begged" the group to stop the mailings, Women's Voices has refused to do so -- even though the mail-in voter registration deadline for the primaries passed April 11.

State election officials say they are bracing for the deluge of confused phone calls and complaints that are sure to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. How many times have they apologized?
I understand this has happened over and over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. They swore in February that they would change their calls. They didn't.
This is vote fraud, pure and simple, whether anybody else knew about it or not.

Of course, Clinton's campaign manager is on the board of the organization, so it's hard to believe they didn't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Scum. Just Scum.
They won't get caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. They should have apologized to Hillary because it is this kind of
stuff that turns many of us against her. We hate the dirty politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. This group has been doing this for years in eleven states. They're liars.
This group has a single purpose, and that is to depress the turnout among black voters through intimidation. It's illegal and I hope they get the book thrown at them.

Hillary Clinton needs to explain why her campaign has so many ties to this group!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. William McNary, Obama Supporter, Speaks Out in Support of WVWV

May 01, 2008

During five election cycles, I have worked with the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition where I co-directed targeted voter registration campaigns and ‘get out the vote’ efforts to the African American community. I have also had the great privelege of serving on the Board of Directors of Women’s Voices, Women Vote – a non profit, non partisan organization whose mission is registering underrepresented Americans, primarily, unmarried women.

I am also a voter. And in this election, I am supporting Barack Obama, whom I’ve known and worked with for years. I am also an elected delegate to the Democratic Convention for Barack Obama.

Given my candidate preference and my background and associations in voter registration efforts, I can say with great conviction, there was no effort to suppress or confuse African American voters, or any other voters in the state of North Carolina by Women’s Voices, Women Vote.

I have seen up close the work of Women’s Voices. Women Vote and know well the commitment, passion and leadership our organization has shown in helping make the voices of unmarried women and other underrepresented voters heard. There may have been mistakes made in this particular registration drive in North Carolina, but Women’s Voices, Women Vote’s motives were not malicious or intended in any way to confuse voters. Ironically, just the opposite. I know the staff is making every effort to right the situation.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-mcnary/womens-voices-women-vote_b_99548.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC