Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama May Levy $15 Billion Tax on Oil Company Profit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:29 AM
Original message
Obama May Levy $15 Billion Tax on Oil Company Profit
Source: bloomberg

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's proposal for a windfall profits tax on oil companies could cost $15 billion a year at last year's profit levels, a campaign adviser said.

The plan would target profit from the biggest oil companies by taxing each barrel of oil costing more than $80, according to a fact sheet on the proposal. The tax would help pay for a $1,000 tax cut for working families, an expansion of the earned- income tax credit and assistance for people who can't afford their energy bills.

``The profits right now are so remarkable that one could trim them 10 percent or so, which would turn out to be somewhere in the $15 billion range,'' said Jason Grumet, an adviser to the Obama campaign.

Obama's plan may be three times larger than the $50 billion, 10-year plan contemplated by his Democratic rival, New York Senator Hillary Clinton. Republican candidate John McCain, an Arizona senator, has no plan to raise oil and gas industry taxes, said his economic adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin.



Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aP_1wrIyt1Nc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good!
Socialism for the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. That $15 Billion is pissed away EVERY MONTH in Iraq
Much of it goes to the private Iraqi militias we are paying not to fight.

And don't forget KBR Halliburton and Bechtel, Black Water and their respective air forces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. And to me thats even on the low side.... Get these suckers paying the bills...
They can afford it and this will give much needed money to begin to address the falling down infrastructure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Windfall profit taxes seem like a fine idea when BIG OIL is so flush
and we are getting flushed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orangerevolution Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Should this also apply to ANY CORPORATION
making x amount of profit, no matter the industry?

This would seem the next logical step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think that's a good idea Obama should consider

Change!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. the problem is they will move off shore
or they will cry and stomp their feet until they get more tax breaks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RantinRavin Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Absolutely
And they should start with the law firms. Talk about windfall profit....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orangerevolution Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. Then what should be the amount of profit a company makes
before the gov't steps in and takes the rest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Why don't we just remove the $18 billion dollars in federal
subsidies we give these companies for a start?

That's big time corporate welfare that I think you'll have to agree is unnecessary for these "infant industries" to protect them from "furrin" competition.

Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orangerevolution Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. My concern with removing the subsidies
is what will the corporations do to make up that lost revenue stream? That is a lot of money!

What might happen are job layoffs as well as an increase at the pump to recover that money.

You don't think the CEO's are going to give up their salaries, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Ten percent
That's plenty of profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #38
53. last Quarter Exxon's profit was right at 10%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
47. Energy and Health are two segments of society where the profit
motive should not be the rationing agent, since people do not have very much control over whether they become ill or whether they will be cold.

NATIONALIZE the oil industry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. Great Idea
we will turn the nations fuel systems over to the likes of FEMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. he has to be president and that`s a long time from now
but i do like the giving the money to energy assistance..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. This only makes sense if we use the tax to transition to renewables.
Otherwise, when peak oil really hits us then we are totally screwed because we won't have the resources we need if we've already obligated it.

My thinking is it should be used as a tax credit for those who want to install solar and wind power, or to give out loans for this purpose.

Then we cut down oil usage, prices should be somewhat relieved, and people are happy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
43. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RantinRavin Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. And what happens when they make oil cost 79.99 a barrel
There goes all the tax revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. How about a simple return to the 1950s rate of 70% for the top
rate? One of the greatest periods of American prosperity.

Then price becomes unimportant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. Great! But maybe these patriotic companies would operate as not-for-profits
for a few years while they have their great war to defend civilization itself.

Or maybe we should make them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. while at it
Put a cap on CEO's salaries. Workers, if lucky, get a 2-3% increase a year and the CEO's are making MILLIONS/year. They should be jailed for grand theft!
Enough of the concentration of wealth to the top 2%!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. The word to watch in this is "MAY"
Still gives too much wiggle room for later. Said to appease potential voters, but gives him the option to *discuss* the tax and potentially drop it for *gag* bipartisan agreements* *gag* later on.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Yep.
It's politically expedient to talk about it right now, but I'll give credit when it's earned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirtyDawg Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's access to the market, stupid...
...for those that claim that Big Oil will simply move their corporate headquarters off-shore in order to avoid the tax on profits, the answer is a process that requires that companies that sell their products in the US will have to pay for the privilege. Some people may call that tariffs, but the fact is US corporations would be subject to them as well. Further, officials of those companies operating out of middle east, or Bermuda, or Jamaica, or someplace, would have make a choice as to what country they call home - in other words, do they want to retain their US Citizenship or not?

Fact is these 'global' corporations have been screwing the US out of corporate income taxes for decades - hell even those that 'incorporate' in Delaware do so just to avoid state corporate taxes where they sell their goods and services, and the government has too-long allowed it to happen.

We all know these bastards are manipulating the supply and price of gas at the pump and laughing at politicians who think they can do anything about it...lets 'effin' try a little nationalization of their greedy asses and see just how quickly they, as well as other industries, get the message that 'greed ain't necessarily good', and if your company is judged not to be operating in the national interest then there will be a price to pay. That may be socialism to some, but every now and then a little reining in is necessary to show the assholes that you mean business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Not likely to happen with the any of the three running for president.
....lets 'effin' try a little nationalization of their greedy asses and see just how quickly they, as well as other industries, get the message that 'greed ain't necessarily good', and if your company is judged not to be operating in the national interest then there will be a price to pay.

Hell will freeze over before any of these corprat politicians running for president will nationalize the oil companies. They won't even give us single payer health care. Think they will go up against their corprat overlords that are their gravy train? :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe he should Chavez their asses and Nationalize the whole thing (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
49. Now You are Talking
I'm done with giving these conglomerates any benefit of the doubt that they will ever be fair, transparent and honorable businesses. They can go the way of the dinosaur as far as I'm concerned.

And since oil is fought over with our men and women (IRAQ), shouldn't it too be nationalized as a NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
55. Does President Chaves have the equivilent of
FEMA working in his country. That is who will assume the responsibility for managing the National Oil Industy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. Still the best candidate
But not far enough! Tax them into the ground! Liquidate their asses and use the money to fix the country and get us off oil hahahaha! GOBAMA :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
57. Then what do you use for a fuel supply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
17. Trim Exxon's Net Profit by ten percent and they still make
One Hundred Million Dollars a Day (NET PROFIT). They showed a Net Profit last quarter of 11 billion dollars. That relates to One Hundred and Ten Million a DAY.. Day in and day out, week after week; month after month; year after year.....10% wouldn't hurt them even a tiny bit......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. This is exactly why this guy should be our next president.
Also why the Oil companies will do everything possible to keep that from happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. that was my thought
after reading this story. he will get no support from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SomeGuyInEagan Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. "Support"? They'll actively work against him
Though I imagine they already are.

On yesterday's show, Thom Hartmann was talking about seeing at Chris Matthews interview with Howard Dean from the 2004 race in which Dean made some disparaging remarks about television networks (I don't recall what Hartmann claimed Dean said). Hartmann said at that point, he turned to his (Hartmann's) wife and remarked that Dean's campaign will no longer be the sweetheart story of the media. Hartmann said that the very next day, corporate media started going after Dean.

Sometimes, you just keep quiet until you have the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. well, that's what i meant!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
48. The oil companies are probably recruiting paid killers to take Obama out, if
Edited on Sat May-03-08 03:12 PM by coalition_unwilling
it appears that any real change is on its way in how the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Media Complex operates. They are probably doing it as I type, if they have not already done so.

See Oliver Stone's "JFK" for more on that topic. The past is prologue. And Obama has more courage in the tip of his little finger than I have in my entire body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Not just NO support
but they will likely bankroll those willing to try and swift boat him more than what's already been done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SomeGuyInEagan Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. This may be naive, but ....
... wouldn't the corporations just pass the cost on to consumers? Extra taxes, fines, whatever ... they just pass it on.

I would rather see ...

1 - Some corporate charters revoked (not just the oil companies ... there are a few manufacturers out there with horrible worker health and environmental records who get off with fines);

2 - Tax breaks and incentives for consumers who invest in effective alternatives for use (change consumer behavior, thereby reducing oil need)

3 - Government-funded research into alternatives and renewables ... too much research in this country is controlled by big business, esp. at research universities who once conducted tax payer-funded research for the public good. Cut corporate-sponsored research at R-1 universities by dwarfing it with tax payer funds.

4 - Some serious investigations into how oil companies are operated (which one would think could lead to number one, above)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBShakes Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. SomeGuy...
Actually, other than #1, all of the things you've mentioned are at least similar to ideas BOTH Senator Clinton and Senator Obama have already proposed. Both candidates have proposed tax credits for companies who invest in clean energy (Obama's is called "cap & trade"), but I think taking it to a consumer level is a good idea too.

Both candidates are pushing Federal investment in renewable energy, and both candidates are on the record as being in favor of opening DOJ investigations into price fixing by the oil companies.

Just so's ya know...

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Can't pass it on. If they could raise the price, they would already.
Edited on Fri May-02-08 02:19 PM by mbperrin
They're stuck with their current price, which even if (and I'm sure it is) it is manipulated, is all they can do.

Edited for spelling. Obvious I teach eco, not English, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. Thats something to say AFTER the election!!!!!
Goddamn it..that's playing right into Neocon hands! The Democratic base is already mobilized. We don't need any more encouragement. Drop this bomb after January, 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. MSM Corp will have their knives out for him this weekend that is for sure
Hang on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrCory Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
60. My thought exactly!
Better yet, don't say a word until AFTER it's signed into law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
24. Whiplash alert. 4, 3, 2, 1....
Watch Obama supporters now change their mind.

Maybe we should use that windfall profits tax to replace the retail sales tax! Hey what a great idea! It's sure a good thing that that smart Obama has these great ideas! It'd help consumers and bring in revenue for roads and alternative energy R&D!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. How about tripling that
Exxon Mobil made that much the last quarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
35. not to sound overly cynical
but if obama were to implement that, the very next day he'll have a "heart attack" or a "stroke" or a "plane crash" or be victim to a "terrorist bomber", the list goes on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cesar008 Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
37. Barack Obama's proposal for a windfall profits tax on oil companies
What a great way to cut gas prices! Raise taxes! Hey, let's cut the price of milk and eggs by raising taxes on them! Woo hoo! Does corn cost too much? Raise taxes on corn! Is bread getting pricey? Raise taxes on bread! Are people not making enough at their jobs? Raise taxes on income! 

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonBlatt Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. Obama should dump resources into www.energystate.org
..........enough of the corporate energy distractions.

www.energystate.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
41. I can't wait to pay at the pump for this gas tax....$5/gal anyone?
I'm sure there is a stipulation for "Not passing this tax on to the consumer"

/sarc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
42. Personally, I have no problem with the higher fuel prices...
..but for those that do, this idea will likely just wind up driving prices up further.

And as the costs go still further up, the next logical step is usually to try to freeze prices. Price controls result in rationing and scarcity.

Corporations have a business model and generally answer to shareholders, they don't "eat" additional costs. They adjust.

A windfall profits tax would just mean oil companies would either raise prices, freeze hiring, cut staff, etc, etc. They are not going to just absorb the cost.

As far as I am concerned the price of fuel going up is a good thing. It's tough on people I know, but high fuel bills result in people buying fuel efficient vehicles and actually forces people to conserve which most people avoid doing unless necessary.

Imajika
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
44. He wants to help people who can't afford energy now by raising the price of it?
How in HELL does this work, people? The people who pull the oil out of the ground and pump it into supertankers, and the commodities speculators, are the ones who set the price of oil. Fining them for paying more than Barack Obama wants them to is the height of idiocy.

I have a wonderful idea: Why don't we cut the price of gas by ending the fucking war that enraged the Arabs into charging over $100 for a barrel of crude?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. We don't get our oil from the Arab OPEC countries. Our suppliers are north of the border
and south of our border..If anything, the price of oil might make the Canadian shale more economical to extract....Same goes for the shale in Colorado.

?
The US also shares a "north slope" border next to the Alaskan oil fields along the Canadian border. Not to mention that Russia is wanting to claim their own slice of Arctic wilderness oil.



The Arctic oil boom is so on.
The shale extractions should be picking it up a few notches and get MSM exposure.
I'll bet that exposure would get played up in OPEC countries enough for them to discourage such competition they will lower the oil price.
Could happen that way. All other scenarios are out the window as far as price fixing goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. Oil costs the same no matter where you get it
If OPEC gets upset because Bush's minions are building torture chambers and rape rooms, the price of West Texas crude is going up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
46. Why not simply dispense with the bullshit and nationalize the
domestic oil industry? Simply expropriate the physical assets of the oil companies and compensate shareholders at fair market value.

Where did God ever write that the profit motive be the driving force behind every segment of society, including one so vital to human happiness as energy or health?

Thoughts from a Democratic Socialist and member of Progressive Democrats of Los Angeles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Oil Is a National Security Issue... EVen McCain Admits as Much
Why should our men and women die for profit? Who are these investors and who the hell do they suppose they are to abuse our military for their own selfish greedy gains?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. Exactly which government official
would you appoint to assume control of all of the assets of every oil company in this country and manage them for the benefit of the the American citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haroldgiowa Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
52. You know what's wrong with taxing Corporations?

?????????

They know how to pass the cost onto the customer. That is something the customer has not learned to do. How to pass that cost onto their source of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ronnie Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
58. I love the word 'may'.
It is so full of meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
59. It only seems right we should get some of our money back from those greedy people/companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC