Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wider Antiterror Role for Elite Forces Rejected (Rumsfeld's plan scrapped)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:25 AM
Original message
Wider Antiterror Role for Elite Forces Rejected (Rumsfeld's plan scrapped)
Source: NY Times

WASHINGTON — The military’s elite Special Operations Command has quietly stepped back from a controversial plan that gave it the authority to carry out secret counterterrorism missions on its own around the world.

The decision culminates four years of misgivings within the military that the command, with its expertise in commando missions and unconventional war, would use its broader mandate too aggressively, by carrying out operations that had not been reviewed or approved by the regional commanders.

A new Special Operations commander, Adm. Eric T. Olson of the Navy Seals, has now said publicly that he intends to play a different role, and will instead continue the command’s new mission as coordinator of the military’s counterterrorism efforts around the world.

The shift reverses what Donald H. Rumsfeld put in place as defense secretary in 2004, when he said he wanted the Special Operations Command, based in Tampa, Fla., to operate unilaterally; he believed that it would be more aggressive in hunting down terrorists than the regional commanders, who are tied most closely to conventional forces.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/21/washington/21military.html?em&ex=1211515200&en=f611986d41f7a4b2&ei=5087%0A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. The first terrorist they should have nabbed was Rummy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. An announcement by the military that they are stepping
Edited on Wed May-21-08 11:37 AM by truedelphi
Away from the use of a secret "anti-terrorist" unit to create havoc in the name of peace should give one pause.

Are they saying they won't, or are they "saying" they "won't" with a <wink> nudge <wink??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The unit needs a new, more secret name
that is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToughLuck Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. What a sick joke that line is from Rumsfeld..yea, why would he want to do
anything conventional, when he can just order torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. proof that the US authorizes terrorism.
what else do you call a group of commandos who operate without any oversight and are authorized to operate "unilaterally" as they alone see fit??????? TERRORISTS!

We have now officially become what we claim to reject and abhor. congratulations rummy and company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC