Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For McCain, A Switch On Telecom Immunity?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 08:41 PM
Original message
For McCain, A Switch On Telecom Immunity?
Source: Wash Post

A top lawyer for Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign said telecommunications companies should be forced to explain their role in the Bush administration's warrantless surveillance program as a condition for legal immunity for past wiretapping, a statement that stands in marked contrast to positions taken by President Bush, McCain and other Republicans in Congress.

"There would need to be hearings, real hearings, to find out what actually happened, what harms actually occurred, rather than some sort of sweeping of things under the rug," Chuck Fish, a former vice president and chief patent counsel at Time Warner, said last week at the Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference in New Haven, Conn., according to an audiotape available on the conference Web site. "That would be absolutely verboten in a McCain administration

The comments -- first noted last week on the blog of the technology magazine Wired -- contradict McCain's voting record, and they are almost certain to disrupt negotiations between Democratic leaders in Congress and Bush administration officials, who are seeking blanket immunity for the telecoms' cooperation with the surveillance program

snip

Fish's comments and the campaign's responses indicate that McCain appears to be taking a new stance that undermines the GOP's negotiating position as well as the party's efforts to label Democrats as weak on terrorism.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/28/AR2008052802967.html



Wow. McSame must be trying to break away from Bush! The Repukes will be pissed over this. Watch for him to reverse this soon. He voted repeatedly to give the telecoms immunity. What's up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Apparently immunity isn't polling well
in some group or another that McCain s courting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. MAn - you need a scorecard to keep up with all the changes
I am not sure McCain is breaking with Bush. I think McCain is breaking with McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. should be easy to dig up the flop that came before this flip
He was for immunity before he was against it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He was against ...

Besides puppies, babies and god, McCain is for everything he was against and now he is against everything he was for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. McFlop!
The straight-talk express just pulled a "U"-ie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Go Go go McFlippyFloppy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. McSame flip flops and
still gets it wrong.
"telecommunications companies should be forced to explain their role in the Bush administration's warrantless surveillance program as a condition for legal immunity"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSinTX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. By the time this is over, McCain will be the Dem nominee
with all his flipping and flopping. Geesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. KnR...
because I was about to double post this.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC