Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military commission head contradicts Pentagon's version of judge's dismissal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:39 PM
Original message
Military commission head contradicts Pentagon's version of judge's dismissal
Source: McClatchy News Service

By CAROL ROSENBERG | Miami Herald

WASHINGTON -- In an extraordinary defense of a military commissions decision, the chief of the Guantanamo court on Monday blamed Army bureaucracy for the need to replace a judge at the trial of Canadian captive Omar Khadr -- not pressure to proceed by Pentagon prosecutors.

But, Marine Col. Ralph Kohlmann added that, contrary to an earlier Defense Department announcement, Army Col. Peter E. Brownback III did not voluntarily retire from active-duty status and had sought to see the trial to completion.

Khadr, now 21, is accused of the July 2002 grenade killing of a U.S. soldier in Afghanistan. He was 15. Brownback, a 30-year veteran of the U.S. Army, was the longest serving commissions judge, until he was relieved last week.

Kohlman's abrupt replacement of Brownback without explanation stirred controversy. Defense lawyers have accused the Pentagon of rushing cases so they'll come to trial at the height of the presidential campaign season.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/200/story/39532.html



It's great to see that people are fighting back against the lies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buckrogers1965 Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is two different stories now...
Would the white house like to start explaining it's role in the firing now?

Or will that take a year or two to be dragged out of them like there being no WMD's, illegal torture, illegal wiretapping, the firing of the prosecutors that wouldn't pursuit bogus cases against political opponents, and the hundreds of other crimes that they are guilty of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. What seems to get lost in all this is: what right do we have to imprison someone else's soldiers
for defending their country against us? I'm sure it's not in international law. If I recall correctly, the last people to do that were the Nazis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. meanwhile the Free Ride Corp Press continues to yuck it up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC