Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Overturns Fine Of CBS Over Janet Jackson

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 01:26 PM
Original message
Court Overturns Fine Of CBS Over Janet Jackson
Source: NY Times

A U.S. appeals court on Monday overturned a decision to fine CBS Corp television stations $550,000 for airing a brief breast flash by pop singer Janet Jackson during the 2004 Super Bowl broadcast.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said the U.S. Federal Communications Commission "arbitrarily and capriciously departed from its prior policy" that exempted fleeting broadcast material from actionable indecency violations.

Jackson's right breast was exposed to almost 90 million TV viewers for a fraction of a second during the live 2004 Super Bowl football halftime show in what fellow pop singer Justin Timberlake later called a "wardrobe malfunction." Timberlake ripped off part of Jackson's bustier exposing Jackson's breast during the show. Despite the brevity, lawmakers and regulators were outraged and vowed a crackdown on broadcast indecency.

U.S. television and radio broadcasters are barred from airing obscene material and are limited from broadcasting indecent materials between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when children are likely to be watching. The restrictions do not apply to cable or satellite services.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/arts/entertainment-cbs-fcc.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Time for Heather Wilson to get all purple and burst into tears
again. How dare they go unpunished for what was clearly an accident?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyIn6eay9Mw

I'm delighted to say she lost her bid for Domenici's (R-fossil) Senate seat.

I'm terrified she'll run for governor and undo all the good Richardson has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavapai Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Americans forbidden to see a tit, while we have boobs running the country???

Go figure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can't believe that our government
would allow any kind of "breasts" to be seen in public, covered or uncovered. I say we form a committee to go house to house to grab every . . . er . . . to snatch . . . um . . . to confiscate every breast in America!! so that no one ever has to see one again!! Why do boobs -- breasts I mean, breasts, hate America?? Indecent and obscene things that they are. They are weapons of mass distraction.


But seriously, what a puritanical society we live in. I've been on European and Caribbean beaches where there were topless women, naked women, naked men walking around in front of anybody -- even kids. I've seen posters of topless women in subways in France. Why do we need to prosecute a tiny accidental exposure?


I'm glad the fines were dropped, but what a pointless, silly waste of time and money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You are right. This country is weirded out by the female breast. And
looking back, what a fire storm over nothing. Most of America missed it but digital freeze frame brought home no one saw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. i, for one, am not wierded out
more bare breasts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5.  what a puritanical society we live in.
Well, look who landed on Plymouth Rock? It wasn't the Hindus, y'know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC