Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Flawed Argument in the Case for War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 10:53 PM
Original message
A Flawed Argument in the Case for War
By Glenn Kessler and Walter Pincus
Sunday, February 1, 2004; Page A01

The information was so startling that CIA Director George J. Tenet, accompanied by Vice President Cheney, trooped up to Capitol Hill to brief the four top Senate and House leaders the day after Labor Day 2002. The administration was gearing up to present its case against Iraq at the United Nations, and lawmakers were eager for any evidence that would prove Saddam Hussein was a grave threat.

In the briefing, Tenet and Cheney presented what one participant described as a "smoking gun": New intelligence showed Iraq had developed unmanned airborne vehicles (UAVs) that could deliver chemical or biological agents. In addition, Iraq had sought software that would allow it to produce sophisticated mapping of the eastern U.S. cities. President Bush hinted at the evidence in a speech on Oct. 7, 2002.

And one year ago, when Secretary of State Colin L. Powell made a lengthy presentation before the U.N. Security Council, he echoed the concern: "Iraq could use these small UAVs, which have a wingspan of only a few meters, to deliver biological agents to its neighbors or if transported, to other countries, including the United States."

Since Powell's speech, however, investigations by U.S. weapons inspectors have determined that the UAVs, or drones, were not designed to spread deadly toxins but to fly unarmed reconnaissance missions.

The story of the UAVs -- just one part of the vast array of claims made by the Bush administration about Iraq's alleged weapons programs -- is emblematic of how U.S. intelligence on Iraq often was wrong, even when officials made efforts to cull the strongest material from a torrent of information.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1825-2004Jan31.html?nav=hptop_ts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. "New intelligence"
Could that be an INC "informant" via the OSP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jeeze....I remember pictures of these "drones" being posted here
on DU. They were something like you would see at a radio controlled airplane fair for challenged model airplane builders!!!

They were held together with duct tape and couldn't have carried much of anything and probably had a range of two miles.

What utter crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purrfessor Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another Bush lie of omission!
Funny, isn't it, how this administration continues to present only their half of the story? Surely they aren't so stupid (arrogant, yes) that they forgot about this Air Force report on the UAVs, and in October 2002, no less.

OCTOBER 2002 – AIR FORCE WARNS WHITE HOUSE: "The government organization most knowledgeable about the United States' UAV program -- the Air Force's National Air and Space Intelligence Center -- had sharply disputed the notion that Iraq's UAVs were being designed as attack weapons" – a WMD claim President Bush used in his October 7 speech on Iraqi WMD, just three days before the congressional vote authorizing the president to use force.

http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=24889

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. They know the 'good puppy' press
will let anything that * does disappear into the memory hole so that the Peterson/Kobe/Martha/Jackson stories can get their WORTHY air time!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Tenet was accompanied by his puppet master....
"...CIA Director George J. Tenet, accompanied by Vice President Cheney, trooped up to Capitol Hill..."

Cheney obviously couldn't trust Tenet to handle this one solo. Cheney was probably close enough to keep a gun in his ribs.

Cheney is an evil, evil, evil ghoul who has assumed something close to human form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Read the whole thing. Here's a pic of the UAV they're worried about:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Are you for real!!!!!
I have a RC plane w/ a wingspan of 6' (bad pilot - killed it and haven't repaired) DO I OWN A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION!!!!

If I fill it (after I fix it) with leaflets of *'s lies - do I qualify!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yep. That's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. Walter Pincus .... again ...
on the cutting edge ...


YAY for Walter ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC