Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Venezuela drug flights up, U.S. says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:53 AM
Original message
Venezuela drug flights up, U.S. says
Source: Los Angeles Times

Suspected drug flights from Venezuela to the Caribbean island of Hispaniola rose 44% over the first three months of the year, U.S. officials say, a surge in activity that some believe was behind Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's expressions of willingness to resume anti-drug cooperation with Washington.

Despite the possible rapprochement with Chavez three years after the leftist leader suspended joint anti-drug efforts, U.S. counter-narcotics officials in Venezuela and the Caribbean say they see no sign of cooperation or of reduced traffic.

"Many people here want to cooperate, but this being an autocracy, no one is going to reach out until the big guy does something," said one U.S. government source who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue. "We're not seeing anything on the narco side except words."

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-drugs3-2008aug03,0,1439635.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. What's wrong with drugs?
Edited on Sun Aug-03-08 11:35 AM by wuushew
Cocaine is no more addictive than the legal drug nicotine. Marijuana is unquestionably a net positive product.


Everytime someone fights U.S. drug policy it helps kill the real monster, which is the hypocrisy of the Amerikan government.


Social and criminal aspects aside, the products that we illicitly import help redress the balance of trade. Dollars are sent into countries where they have a higher net utility for the recipients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. US drug policy has been screwed up for years
It certainly has enabled the rise of criminal organizations in Latin America.

I hope that official drug policy will shift in the upcoming years to a more enlightened approach, but it's obviously too much of a hot potato for Obama in particular to speak about before the election.

There are a lot of entrenched organizations that benefit from current drug policy, from beer distributors to prison guard unions, so it will be a challenge to change direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Truly an excellent question - "What's wrong with drugs"?
Edited on Sun Aug-03-08 01:52 PM by GreenTea
Who's going to say there's something wrong with them....the 52% of Americans who are paying pharmaceutical corporations to be addicted to one of their drugs..... Or is it the hundred million plus who drink a beer or have a martini, maybe it's the the ones lying in the gutter somewhere begging for a drink, it's certainly not the tens of millions of people killing themselves smoking cigars & cigarettes wouldn't object....

So who is it?

Is it the government (the corporations) who say which profitable drugs can be legal....they certainly don't want some drug legal that may enlighten one, or that one can easily medicate themselves, without massive medical cost (and profits for a few) a drug with with no addiction, no hang-overs and no cancer causing qualities or additives....NO! That drug must always be kept illegal....

You'll NEVER see a guy lying in the gutter begging for a joint!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. FLight increased to the island of Hispaniola ? So which is it

The Republic of Haiti or the Dominican Republic half ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Beats me
The article doesn't indicate which half is the more popular transit point, although one could logically assume that Haiti, as the poorer of the two countries, might be the more popular destination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. I can see when there is crap in the news: "Suspected drug flights from Venezuela"
Edited on Sun Aug-03-08 12:16 PM by AlphaCentauri
where are the anti-drug efforts in the island of Hispaniola if they don't even give a number of how many air planes have been capture. Boys we have to learn how to distinguish between an opinion and real facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. They have oil. What more proof do you need that their up to no good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm going to create a shortcut for BULLSHIT
Edited on Sun Aug-03-08 02:06 PM by bitchkitty
I don't believe a word of this. Who says? Unnamed "U.S. Officials".

P-R-O-P-A-G-A-N-D-A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I'm with you. I've ceased believing ANYTHING in our fuckwad media says about Venezuela.
They are total liars. And one of their many lies is presented here, in the mouth of an anonymous Bushite agent--that Hugo Chavez is an "autocrat." Chavez is a powerful, visionary and so far unkillable political leader, in the mold of FDR, and he is, in truth, even more scrupulous than FDR was, as to adherence to the law and the constitution. He has been elected and re-elected in an election system that puts our own to shame for its transparency, enjoys a 70% approval rating, and is well-liked, and often praised, by other South American leaders. Lula da Silva, president of Brazil, for instance, has said, of Chavez: "You can criticize Chavez on a lot of things, but not on democracy."

So, what is this latest bullshit, about increased cocaine flights, about? Could be about illegal U.S. overflights of Venezuela--surveillance flights that may have to do with a probable Bushwhacky scheme to foment a secessionist movement in Zulia, Venezuela's oil rich state on the Caribbean coast, adjacent to Colombia ($6 BILLION in U.S. military aid to Colombia, through Bushite fingers), where the U.S. 4th Fleet (newly reconstituted by the Bush junta) will be roaming around in the coming months.

Ecuador's president, Rafael Correa, says there is a three-country secessionist scheme--most visible, currently, in Bolivia, and including Ecuador--to split off the oil rich provinces into fascist mini-states in control of the oil (to deny benefit of the oil to social programs, and to, of course, line Exxon Mobil's and others' pockets, instead). Bushfucks can't win elections in South America, cuz South Americans insist on transparent vote counting (unlike us saps in the north). So, the only way to get the oil--which they lust after--is to instigate civil war and get the oil out from under the control of leftist national governments, and into the hands of minority rich elites who will do Exxon Mobil's bidding.

They've tried everything else--including the 2002 coup attempt in Venezuela, followed by the crippling oil professionals' strike, the USAID-NED funded recall election, assassination plots hatched in the Colombian military, a plot to hand Chavez a diplomatic disaster, with dead hostages--in the hostage negotiations that Chavez undertook with the FARC in Nov 07-Feb 08, at Colombia's request--the ridiculous "suitcase full of money" caper out of Miami, non-stop slander in the corporate press (now including Rafael Correa), and on, and on, and on--and nothing has worked. Venezuelans keep voting for Chavez and other leftists, as do the rest of South America's voters (electing a leftist most recently in Paraguay). The leftist movement just keeps getting bigger--and what is more--better and better organized, now with the newly forming South American "Common Market" (UNASUR) and (proposed by Brazil) common defense.

Thus, we see Bushite (our taxes) funding, organizing and probably arming of the white racists in Bolivia, who want to secede from Evo Morales' government--and transcripts and other reports of fascist meetings regarding Zulia, and western Ecuador. Divide. and. Conquer.

But back to the cocaine trade. The failed, corrupt, murderous U.S. "war on drugs," under Bush, has never been anything other than a scheme to militarize (fascify) South America, to install U.S. military surveillance everywhere (prep for whatever oil war can be instigated), and to get people used to U.S. troops on the ground, to serve various Bush/corporate plots. It may never have been intended to stop the cocaine trade, even under Clinton, but, under Bush, it is a criminal enterprise, and it is no accident that Bush's pet country in South America, Colombia, is run by narco-traffickers, propped up by rightwing death squads, with a "war room" in the U.S. Embassy in Bogota, in which they watch--and probably orchestrate--U.S./Colombian military operations, such as the bombing/raid of Ecuador in March, and the recent Ingrid Betancourt 'rescue' stunt.

Chavez and other leftist leaders have to maneuver around this bad situation. Colombia is a major trouble-maker and a launching pad for Oil War II. It is extremely corrupt and has one of the worst human rights records on earth. One of the dangers is that Def. Minister Santos will oust Alvaro Uribe, who is at least nominally legitimate as Colombia's president, and instigate an all-out military dictatorship. Chavez therefore needs to be at once extremely wary of Uribe (former Medellin Cartel), and help prop him up against Santos. (Think Rumsfeld.) That is why Chavez met with Uribe, recently, to "bury the hatchet" and announce joint development projects. (Santos tried to sabotage that meeting.) Uribe is dealing with an out-of-control military which is directly in the pocket of the Bush junta. Uribe is bad (he is a criminal). But Santos is worse (he is a potential Pinochet). Venezuela furthermore has to deal with constant harassment of its borders by Colombian drug lords and the Colombian military/death squads, and also with a hundred thousand Colombian refugees pouring into Venezuela (mostly fleeing the death squads and "war on drugs" pesticide spraying--one of the horrors of this "war").

Lula da Silva called Chavez "the great peacemaker" in the context of the U.S./Colombian bombing/raid into Ecuador (which almost started a war). Chavez is a VERY savvy leader, who has inevitably gone for the most peaceful, forgiving policy, throughout his tenure as president. When caches of arms and hundreds of Colombian mercenaries were caught at a ranch in Venezuela (owned by a rightwing politician), he sent the soldiers back to Colombia, saying they didn't know what they were doing. (It was a coup/assassination plot.) He has been extraordinarily un-vengeful--a reflection of his fundamental democratic and social justice beliefs. The huge drug trade (also weapons trade) in South America most certainly needs to be addressed. The Bolivarian countries take the common sense approach of keeping the thousand year old tradition of chewing coca leaves and drinking coca tea legal, but breaking up large criminal enterprises that turn coca leaves into cocaine, and that drive small peasant farmers off the land. Venezuela doesn't want Colombia's cocaine trade. They have been fervent at interdiction and busts. But they don't believe in criminalizing ordinary citizens, nor in militarizing society around this issue.

This is a refreshing approach, to say the least. It is one of the reasons that the Bolivarian democracies are on the Bushites' shit list. But Chavez and other leftist leaders also have to face the clear threat of Bushite intent to use the "war on drugs" against them (as cover for their oil war, and to defame and topple these leaders). The vicious hypocrisy of the "war on drugs" is typical of Bushites. As with their mind-bogglingly phony 'christianity,' it is merely a cover for horrendous crimes (--such as the 39 union leaders murdered by the Colombian military and its death squads this year alone). Chavez has called Bush "Mr. Danger" (a reference to a popular Venezuelan novel about a land-grabbing criminal). The epithet is apt in many ways. The Bushite "war on drugs" is dangerous, the way a pit of vipers is dangerous. If it's in your path, you can't ignore it. You have to approach the problem with great care, caution and forethought, and think your way around this writhing, venomous obstacle, with your life in peril at the slightest mis-step.

This anonymous Bushite source, in the L.A. Times article, is one of the vipers--hissing with danger. It's all up to "autocrat" Chavez, is it--whether cocaine continues to flow freely into the U.S. from the Bushite client state of Colombia? Uh-huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why put this shit up? What are you doing Z man, seeing what can
pass the BS monitors at DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. The positive side is that we have so many eloquent
posters who smack down the b.s.!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Smack down the BS?
Sticking your fingers in your ears, closing your eyes, and chanting "I don't believe it" is a smackdown?

Uh, OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. No, opening my eyes, checking the source of the link,
the tone of the article, and the fact that you posted it, and then saying loudly and clearly:

BULLSHIT.

Uh, yes - okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder if Bush will pull a Noriega on Chavez?
They are probably thinking. Do we go to war with Iran and steal their oil or do we go to war with Venezuela and steal their oil? I think we're about to see a return of "The Decider."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Apparently this LA Times article pisses off the Chavezistas
After all, it is news reported from the real world.

Don't know why it should create such a furor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. News reported from the real world?

Didn't you notice the source of the information?

When did you start trusting the Bush administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Sure, I noticed
Do you think everyone who works for the government is a Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Anyone who has authority to speak for the administration is
Edited on Sun Aug-03-08 08:28 PM by Tempest
That much has been made perfectly clear by this administrationi over the last 7 years. The politicizing of the DOJ is a perfect example of that, as the lawyers speak for the administration in court.

Especially when it comes to speaking on subjects near and dear to them, like Venezuela.

And make statements like "but this being an autocracy" referring to Chavez.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. So if this report was untrue
you don't think anyone in the government would report it as a phony story?

Anyone that knows what they're talking about, that is, and not the know-nothings that automatically deny anything reported that sounds negative about Chavez or Venezuela.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Ha - only you would call this a furor.
And stop replying to your own posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Making up a posting rule?
Why don't you tell the Latin American motormouth the same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Hey, have at it -
it just looks kind of silly to reply to your own posts - like nobody will play with you? Instead of wasting keystrokes, have a debate with the other posters on the thread - try to refute what they are saying, instead of regurgitating RW bullshit - wouldn't that be fun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well what if those planes flew below radar in columbian airspace,...
...then gain enough altitude to be detected by radar once they were within proximity of a venezuelan runway near the carribean coast. Our black-ops pilots sure know about flying low to avoid detection. Guess they didn't want another accident in Mexico, since it was all over the papers.

That's just my assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe it's some of the CIA guys running more cocaine, like their own Barry Seal.
He's gone, but the occupation would still live on, obviously:
~snip~
According to Pete Brewton (The Mafia, CIA & George Bush), as soon as Seal was freed he "began working full-time for the CIA, travelling back and forth from the United States to Latin America." Daniel Hopsicker claims Seal was now "sheep-dipped" into the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as an agent for the Special Operations Group. Seal worked under Lucien Conein, who ran secret missions for the DEA. Egil Krogh, who was employed by Richard Nixon as liaison to the FBI and the DEA, later admitted that he placed Cronein in the Office of Narcotics in the White House.

According to Deborah Seal, her husband became involved in drug smuggling in 1975. On 10th December, 1979, Barry Seal and Steve Planta were arrested in Honduras, after arriving from Ecuador with 40 kilos of cocaine. Newspapers reported that $25 million worth of cocaine was confiscated and the men were charged with having 17 kilos of cocaine in their possession. Seal spent nine months in prison before being released without charge.

While in prison, Barry Seal met William Roger Reeves, a fellow drug smuggler who worked for the Ochoa family of Medellin. In 1981, Reeves, Ochoa's business manager in New Orleans, introduced Seal to Felix Bates. As a result Seal began a close relationship with the Colombians and became part of what became known as the Medellin Cartel. Established in 1980, the Medellin Cartel began when Jorge Ochoa convinced the major cocaine families to contribute $7 million each for the formation of a 2,000-man army in order to destroy the Marxist revolutionary group M-19, that was causing the drug barons problems in Colombia.

Drug barons such as Jorge Ochoa and Pablo Escobar now began working together. It has been estimated that the cartel made up to $60 million per month and its leaders joined the list of the world's richest men. The CIA watched this development with interest. It decided that the Medellin Cartel could be used to help defeat communism throughout Latin America. According to Leslie Cockburn, CIA agent, Felix I. Rodriguez, persuaded the Medellin Cartel to make a $10 million contribution to the Contras.

By 1982 Barry Seal was bringing in drugs to the United States on behalf of the Medellin Cartel. Seal moved his base of operations from Louisiana to Mena, an obscure airport in the secluded mountains of western Arkansas. Seal told friends that he once made $1.5 million on a single cocaine flight. Seal worked directly for Sonia Atala, the CIA protected drug baron (Michael Levine, The Big White Lie: The CIA and the Cocaine/Crack Epidemic). It is also claimed that Seal's fleet of planes to ferry supplies to Contra camps in Honduras and Costa Rica. His planes also made return trips to airstrips in the mountains of Colombia and Venezuela. According to Roger Morris (Partners in Power): "His well-connected and officially-protected smuggling operation based in Mena accounted for billions in drugs and arms".

Seal also obtained two new multi-million dollar Beech Craft King Air 200s. According to Daniel Hopsicker, these aircraft were purchased by a Phoenix-based corporation that acted as a "front" for John Singlaub. This company also owned Southern Air, a CIA proprietary connected to William Casey, Richard Secord, Felix I. Rodriguez and George H. W. Bush.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKseal.htm



Barry Seal, behind Porter Goss, who's behind the drunk lying on the stage, Cuban "exile" CIA terrorist, Felix Rodriguez.





Wikipedia:
Barry Seal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Adler Berriman Seal, or "Barry Seal" (July 16, 1939–February 19, 1986) was a pilot with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and a drug smuggler (also with the CIA) turned Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) informant. After a 1984 arrest in Fort Lauderdale, Florida for money laundering and Quaalude smuggling, Seal negotiated a plea bargain that included him becoming an informant for the DEA and testifying against his former Colombian employers, putting several of them in jail. He was murdered on February 19, 1986 in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The entire time Seal was engaged in drug trafficking he was also a commercial airline pilot. He flew transcontinental flights for TWA until he was fired after his 1984 arrest. Sam Dalton, the New Orleans attorney who represented the Colombian hit men subpoenaed the CIA about what he suspected was its complicity in Seal's assassination in court, and with great difficulty and the assistance of the judge, was able to get the suitcase Seal was carrying on the night of his murder. Though it had been ransacked, he found a piece of paper in the wallet with the private phone number of George H. W. Bush.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Seal

~~~~~~~~~
Tuesday, April 05, 2005
FTR #503 The Death of Barry Seal

Recorded March 20, 2005
REAL AUDIO

The death of drug smuggler and CIA operative Barry Seal encapsulates much of the secret and unsavory history of American covert operations in the second half of the 20th century. A primary operator in the Contra-related cocaine smuggling of the 1980’s, Seal was gunned down in February of 1986 because he was threatening to “roll-over”—to squeal on his handlers. Had Seal done this, it might have led to the downfall of the Reagan/Bush administration and the curtailment of the Contra-support operation. The material in this program is from the remarkable book Barry and the Boys by Daniel Hopsicker. (Be sure to visit his website and order the book.) Beginning with the account of Seal’s murder being broadcast over the police radio in the Baton Rouge area, the program relates the extraordinary circumstances surrounding the arrest and “prosecution” of the Colombian assassins who killed Seal. Even more extraordinary was the behavior of the FBI, which (contrary to legal procedure) confiscated evidence that had been kept by Seal in the trunk of his Cadillac. That evidence consisted of tapes of Seal talking with his handlers, who apparently included elements of the CIA and then Vice-President George Bush. When one of Seal’s attorneys prodded Seal for more information about whom he was working for, Seal handed him the phone and told him to call a number that he gave to his counsel. When Unglesby (the lawyer) called the number, he got Vice-President Bush’s office. When Seal attempted to prevail on Bush to intervene on his behalf with the IRS, Seal was murdered. Much of the program deals with Seal’s history in the world of covert operations—especially his involvement with the New Orleans milieu involved in the assassination of JFK.

Program Highlights Include: The possibility that Seal may have flown a getaway plane out of Dallas on 11/22/1963; Seal’s involvement with CIA covert operations when he was still in high school; Seal’s participation in a Civil Air Patrol unit commanded by JFK assassination conspirator David Ferrie and including among its members Lee Harvey Oswald; the brutal warning sent to Louisiana State Police Lieutenant Robert Thommasson (his dog was decapitated and left floating in his backyard pool as a deterrent to Thommasson’s talking about Seal; an overview of Seal’s career in the Special Forces; Seal’s involvement with a unit that may have been involved in the assassination of Martin Luther King; allegations that Seal’s murder had been contracted by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North; indications that a number of other people familiar with the details of Seal’s drug-smuggling career may have been murdered to insure their silence; the special negotiations that moved the base of Seal’s smuggling operations from Louisiana to Mena, Arkansas.
http://ftrsummary.blogspot.com/2005/04/ftr-503-death-of-barry-seal.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. If Not Colombia, Then Where is the Cocaine Coming From?
If Not Colombia, Then Where is the Cocaine Coming From?
August 1, 2008
by Garry Leech

Colombia’s National Police Chief Oscar Naranjo recently announced that his country’s production of cocaine has dropped by more than half and that it is now responsible for only 54 percent of global production. Speaking at an anti-drug summit in Cartagena, Naranjo’s comments not only constitute the latest misinformation being distributed by the government of President Alvaro Uribe, but they are also ludicrous. Naranjo claims that Colombia was responsible for 90 percent of the world’s cocaine production when President Uribe came to office in 2002. This is a figure that analysts have regularly referred to with regard to the distribution of cocaine production. But if Naranjo’s claim that Colombia is now only responsible for 54 percent of production is true, then it begs the question: Where is the rest of the cocaine being produced?

The price, purity and availability of cocaine has not shifted dramatically over the past decade and, considering that cocaine use in North America and Europe has not diminished during this period, one can safely assume that production levels have remained fairly constant. As a result, if Colombia is now responsible for only 54 percent of production, then there is an awful lot of cocaine being produced in other nations. Given that there is no evidence of significant amounts of coca crops being cultivated outside the Andean region, and it is doubtful that the cocaine is being produced very far from the plant that provides its core ingredient, then there are only a few countries that could be alternative producers.

Most of the coca cultivated in the Andean region—and in the world—is grown in Colombia, Bolivia and Peru. While there is little evidence of coca cultivation in neighboring countries such as Ecuador, Brazil and Venezuela, they are close enough to coca growing regions to be viable cocaine production centers. Consequently, if Naranjo’s claims are correct, then 46 percent of the world’s cocaine production is likely occurring in one or more of these countries. And yet, there is no evidence of any significant cocaine production in any of these countries. Even the US State Department’s annual narcotics report, while criticizing unfriendly governments in Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador for a lack of cooperation in the war on drugs, does not accuse any of these countries of being major producers of cocaine. ...

http://www.colombiajournal.org/colombia290.htm


Venezuela drug flights up, U.S. says

... Despite U.S.-backed eradication efforts, coca cultivation in Colombia rose 27% last year, according to a United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime report issued in June ...

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-drugs3-2008aug03,0,1439635.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. OMGAH DRUGZ WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 01:22 PM by FarceOfNature
:scared:

Better get some proxy armies raised right quick over there in Commieland! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. CARTAGENA DECLARATION: Regional Summit on the World Drug Problem, Security & Cooperation (1 Aug 08)
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 01:26 PM by struggle4progress
THE CARTAGENA DECLARATION
Regional Summit on the World Drug Problem, Security and Cooperation
August 1, 2008
Cartagena de Indias, Republic of Colombia

The Heads of State/Government and/or Heads of Delegation of the countries of the Caribbean, Central America, Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela, meeting in the city of Cartagena de Indias (Colombia) on July 30-31 and August 1, 2008 for the Regional Summit on the World Drug Problem, Security and Cooperation:

ACKNOWLEDGING the efforts of the countries of the region within the national sphere and within the scope of regional and bilateral cooperation in the fight against illicit drugs and connected crimes;

ACKNOWLEDGING the efforts of the countries that took part in the last Regional Summit on Drugs, Security and Cooperation, held in Santo Domingo during March 2007, taking as a basis the actions being carried out by the countries within the framework of the UN and the OAS, as well as the regional, subregional and bilateral mechanisms and initiatives for an exchange of information, experiences, training and institution building;

RECOGNIZING the efforts made by the Member States of the Central American Integration System (SICA) and by the CARICOM Council of Ministers of National Security and Law Enforcement (CONSLE) in the respective drafting and approval of the Security Strategy for Central America and Mexico, and the Action Plan for the Central American region, as well as the CONSLE Regional Security Strategy and Action Plan, which contain a series of initiatives to counter illicit drug trafficking, its connected crimes and transnational organized crime;

REAFFIRMING that the fight against the world drug problem and its connected crimes must be addressed from the standpoint of joint and shared responsibility, so each State may assume its commitment on this matter in a decisive manner and with political will;

REAFFIRMING also that the fight against the world drug problem and its connected crimes must be addressed with full respect for the objectives and principles embodied in the United Nations Charter;

REAFFIRMING also the commitments that the Member States assumed in the Political Declaration adopted by the United Nations General Assembly during its XX Special Session dedicated to common action to counter the world drug problem and highlighting the importance of the work being done to review the Declaration, wherein the States acknowledge that action to counter the world drug problem is a joint and shared responsibility that demands a multilateral, integral and balanced approach;

REAFFIRMING the concern for the increase in violence that may be occasioned by the production and illicit trafficking of drugs and weapons;

ACKNOWLEDGING that, although the States, civil society and multilateral organizations at regional, biregional, hemispheric and global level have redoubled their efforts to combat the world drug problem and its connected crimes, security and development continue to be threatened by such crimes;

REAFFIRMING the concern about the new global and regional trends and patterns evidenced by the trafficking of illicit drugs of natural and synthetic origin, chemicals, precursors and other substances used to produce illicit drugs;

ACKNOWLEDGING that international cooperation in the fight against drug production, trafficking, and consumption, in addition to the current scope of the problem as it affects the region, demand added financial support, technology and training consistent with the priorities determined by our States;

RECOGNIZING the importance of promoting effective cooperation, in real time, among the competent authorities to strengthen the capacity for response to control illicit trafficking in drugs, chemicals, precursors and other substances used to produce illicit drugs, in accordance with the present Declaration and the attached Action Plan, and the international commitments assumed by our States;

CONCERNED about the enormous national costs and sacrifices in terms of human life and the social cost in general created by the fight against the world drug problem and its connected crime s;

CONCERNED also about the serious environmental impact to ecosystems that are considered vital, generated by the clearing and burning of large forested areas to make way for illicit crops, processing and the construction of clandestine air strips, shipyards and piers, all of which contributes to the destruction of the habitat of countless species of fauna and flora, endangers the genetic potential found in those areas, and pollutes soil and water through the indiscriminate use and dumping of chemical substances;

EMPHASIZING the relevance of the work being done by existing organizations and mechanisms, particularly those of the InterAmerican Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD) and its Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism (MEM), which enable the participating States to have a better understanding of the world drug problem at the hemispheric level, to value regional efforts to respond adequately, to recognize the progress being made, and to set policies for the future;

REAFFIRMING the commitment of the international community to regard alternative integral, preventive and sustainable development as a way to reduce the supply of illicit drugs and to discourage their trafficking, by planning actions for prior eradication and a policy of zero illicit crops to reinforce the communities and territories that are affected or threatened by illicit crops, as an essential part of the strategy to counter the world drug problem, pursuant to their national policies;

RECOGNIZING the importance of facilitating full participation, for all States that manifest their will to do so, in the processes and mechanisms for regional cooperation intended to address the world drug problem and its connected crimes;

REAFFIRMING the existing commitment to strengthen relations among the countries in our region to confront the world drug problem and its connected crimes, which threaten the safety of our societies and institutions;

HEREBY DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The fight against the world drug problem is a joint and shared responsibility that must be assumed in a coordinated manner with respect to every link in the drug chain: demand, production, trafficking, distribution, diversion of precursor chemicals and other substances used in the production of illicit drugs, asset laundering and other connected crimes;

2. There must be a balance between reducing demand and controlling supply so that both tasks are mutually reinforced within the scope of the commitments assumed in the Political Declaration and in the Action Plan adopted by the United Nations General Assembly during its XX Special Session on common action to counter the world drug problem (UNGASS 98);

3. The buildup in regional cooperation in this area must remain founded on full respect for the principles embodied in the United Nations Charter, in International Law, and in the domestic legislation of the States;

4. It is important to strengthen, pursuant to the domestic legislation of the States and with full respect for their jurisdiction, the cooperation among judicial authorities, particularly concerning mutual legal assistance on criminal matters, as well as among the police and all other competent agencies of the countries of the region, based on noninterference in the domestic affairs of the States, respect for sovereignty and the selfdetermination of peoples at every level, to prevent and combat the illicit trafficking of drugs via air, sea, ports and borders, as well as the illicit trafficking of weapons, asset laundering, and the diversion of controlled precursor chemicals and the finished products that contain them;

5. They agree to continue working to perfect the measures adopted nationally, in keeping with pertinent international instruments, so as to prevent organized crime from acquiring and using firearms and ammunition, as well as to establish and share databases on firearms, ammunition and explosives impounded from organized crime;

6. It is important to streng then and update the cooperation mechanisms that already exist to prevent the diversion of internationally controlled precursors and chemical substances that are used to produce illicit drugs, such as action undertaken within the scope of the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB), particularly notification prior to the export of such substances;

7. They pledge to encourage the creation or strengthening of national drug observatories in the countries of the region and to work, as appropriate, in conjunction with the CICAD InterAmerican Observatory on Drugs or other instances for bilateral or multilateral cooperation that facilitate the participation of the interested States, so as to develop information and statistical systems that support decisionmaking and the definition of national policies to counter the world drug problem and its connected crimes;

8. They agree to share the acquired experiences and best practices that have been developed by our countries, doing so within the framework of international, regional, subregional and bilateral agencies that specialize in combating the world drug problem and its connected crimes;

9. Action to reduce the use of illicit drugs and the undue use of licit drugs must be strengthened by affording special attention to prevention, education, treatment, rehabilitation, and social reintegration through campaigns to raise public awareness; accordingly, they pledge to reinforce the subprogrammes and/or initiatives within national antidrug programmes that may help to reduce the demand for drugs;

10. They reaffirm the commitment to strengthen the mechanisms for coordination and an exchange of experience among the countries in the region on technical and institutional aspects, so as to reduce illicit crops and illicit drug production, and to promote action to recover and consolidate the fragile ecosystems affected by illicit crops, through support fro m international cooperation;

11. They urgently call upon donor governments, as well as multilateral organizations and international and regional financial institutions to increase the financial, technical and training assistance provided to our countries, pursuant to the principle of joint and shared responsibility and as an indication of their commitment in the fight against the world drug problem;

12. They recognize, in this context, the necessity of additional cooperation for the countries that are not drug producers or consumers, but carry out significant and costly efforts to combat the traffic;

13. They reiterate their willingness to participate in the process to review the commitments adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations during its XX Special Session (UNGASS), which was dedicated to common action to counter the world drug problem, and to participate actively in the preliminary work and the highlevel segment scheduled within the scope of the 52nd session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, which will be held in March 2009;

14. They instruct the competent agencies of their States to implement the Action Plan, which is an integral part of this Declaration, doing so pursuant to their domestic legislation and taking into account the action being carried out within the scope of the UN and the OAS, so as to contribute to the security of the region by countering the world illicit drug problem and its connected crimes;

15. The States signing this Declaration pledge to follow up on and comply with the commitments set forth in the present Declaration and in its Action Plan.

The Heads of State/Government and/or Heads of Delegation express their gratitude and appreciation for the hospitality extended to them by the government and the people of Colombia during their visit to the country.

Done in Cartagena de Indias on the first (1) day of August of the year two thousand eight (2008) in three original versions in Spanish, French and English, each being equally authentic.

Barbados
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
Commonwealth of Dominica
Cooperative Republic of Guyana
Dominican Republic
Federation of Saint Christopher and Nevis
Jamaica
Republic of Colombia
Republic of Nicaragua
Republic of Panama
Republic of Suriname
Republic of Trinidad and Tobago
United Mexican States

http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/article/istockanalyst9807.htm


Wouldn't want any coverage of this, would we ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC