Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gorbachev Says NATO Growth Aimed At Isolating Russia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 06:26 PM
Original message
Gorbachev Says NATO Growth Aimed At Isolating Russia
Source: Ria Novosti

MADRID, September 8 (RIA Novosti) - Former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev has said that calls from the U.S. and other Western powers to bring Ukraine and Georgia into NATO are purely aimed at isolating Russia.

"Why does NATO need these countries? To fight against Iran? This is just ridiculous," Gorbachev told Spanish agency EFE.

NATO refused at its summit in April to let Georgia and Ukraine into the Membership Action Plan, a key step for membership in the 26-nation alliance, but promised to review the decision in December. The countries had received strong U.S. backing for their bids.

In their drive to bring the post-Soviet countries into the alliance, Western powers are trying to "lock Russia in," Gorbachev said.

He also said that in the U.S. there are "certain circles who are pushing the country toward confrontation and NATO expansion, to earn large amounts of money from the production of new armaments," and that the world now faces the threat of a "return to geopolitical games."

---
Russia "does not want to command" the world, but is "fulfilling its international obligations, while avoiding illegal games," Gorbachev said.



Read more: http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080908/116627355.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. gorbachev is not as stupid as bush n cheney lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. We 'll treat Russia like a bastard calf
as long as she seemingly stands in the way of 'our' war with Iran. Chaney is so desperate he'll start a war in Georgia if he has to to get his way. If he can tie Russia up there then I'll be he'll do a preemptive strike on Iran. He's salivating at the thought of all that oil and the private corporation profits from supporting another war. $58.00 per plate of food, $100.00 per load of laundry, $90.00 to dump the garbage out in the desert, a war with Iran...priceless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Purveyor
Purveyor

I believe NATO should be very carefully to go into the former soviet union states. Not because it is "russian back-jard" and they have the right to do what ever they want to them. But because Russia are very touchy to let NATO, so close to it own border.. Er, the United States so close to its own border.. For the moment it is not the other member of the NATO alliance who are pushing for membership for Ukraine and other member, but the US.. And the US have provoked Russia in so many ways the last coupe of year.. And US, or at least the administration really believe that Russia would not do something, when it is almost clear for everyone with a half a brain, that this is not to help the "small country" in the Central Asia and Caucasus to protect them self against russian aggression.. This is to provoke something with this states, so US can claim that they have to be given emergency membership into NATO. And then article 5 would be in action before we understand what happend...

I can understand both the former union members point of view, but also Gorbatsjovs point of view. It was bad enough to lose the "empire". but to let a old enemy on their doorstep, that is a whole another game.. And that is what is happening now. And the russians know they are wounder able in the caucasus region. It have been in centuries been told as the "soft underbelly" in the russian empire. And many country who have been in war with Russia, have worked hard to get Caucasus on their side, by "friendship" or by force. And I fear that many of the former soviet union member would learn the hard way, that the US are no easy "big brother" than the old "big brother":. Not with the Neo-Cons in charge that is.. They are worse than the stalinist at Soviet union in the 1950s... Far worse, more like the Nazis, who once worked hard to make slaves of everyone who could be "registered" as "germans"... The "old europe" as mr Rumsfeld was putting it before the Iraq war, was maybe not that easy to play with as the "New europe". But then the "old europe" had some respect for Russia.. The "New Europe" really believe that US would be there to protect them, if Russia was to be stubborn, or worse, tell them something about the real power of the Russian armed forces..

Poland, who have a old, old grudge against Russia, have definitely provoked Russia, with the Missile system that US want there - alleged to protect against rouge missiles from Iran and North Korea.. Who silly because if that was true, then the invitation the former Russian President Putin had, to put the "shield" on a former air force base where the US and Russian together could work together, to keep the evildoers in Iran and North Korea at hand.. But no.. The genial evil mr Chenney say no, and therefore the whole system was collapsed. And now will Poland have the rockets, just miles from the russian borders... And the russian are right, when they are afraid that they could be pointed, not against Iran and North Korea, but against Russia...

And they have been telling the world, that they have pointed their missiles against European cities and other places of interest and if Poland/USA was to be to much provocation in their action, everything is on the table... Included nuclear weapons.. Sound like exactly what the US are telling the world doesn't it?

And on a side note. Many of the former Soviet union member, specially in the Caucasus are have oil and gas, or infrastructure to transport the oil and gas from where they are been produced, to the rest of the world. For the most part, the infrastructure was been build when they was part of the Soviet Union, and after the breakdown they was coming into the nations... Today Russia Need the pipelines to sell their gas and oil. But if the pipelines are in "enemy hands" then they could close the infrastructure to russian oil fields. And it is definitely in Russian interest to keep the pipelines open.. Even if it means they have to "take into their own hands" to do it...

No doubt in my mind that the current Administration in the US want to provoke something with Russia. Not an all out war, that is not in their interest.. But a "shooting war by proxy" so the world, and to the point China and Russia are in no way possible to protect Iran against war is possible.. I would no doubt for a second that this administration are willing to do what ever to get their goals...

I fear the worst, but hope for the best Even this administration can't do more bad thing, than they have been doing already, can they?.. I hope not... But I fear what they can do, even on the "eve" their administration... For some "Profit".

Diclotican

Sorry my bad english, not my native language


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Where's our Russian expert - governator Palin? They tell us she has TONS of experience in dealing
with such issues, particularly Russia, since it's directly NEXT DOOR TO ALASKA!!!

if not her, then where is our other self-proclaimed russian expert kindasleezy?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. It is an accepted fact that NATO is not for defence. but to carry out aggression against others
NATO's war on Yugoslavia was an abomination!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can't bully the UN or G8--so wave a toy gun at NATO.
The US is a paper tiger--unable to deliver on anything beyond looking formidable. If McCain is elected we will see what happens to paper when the world ignites a fire beneath it. Time to build those bomb shelters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. pushing nato up to russia's borders is as insane as the useless missile defense system
we encouraged georgia's invasion of abkazia and s. ossettia

and goaded russia into acting

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. U.S. Economic Plan - "confrontation & Nato expansion to earn large amounts of money from the
Edited on Tue Sep-09-08 10:10 AM by Dover
production of armaments." That is the primary purpose of a cold war. Stir the pot, create fear and insecurity and reap the rewards of big arms deals and wars.
Yeah, that's the solution. And lots of death and destruction.

That's what one does when the only cards they hold (or care to hold) are stockpiles of weapons.

Of course Russia ain't doing so bad in the arms and military equipment sales department either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. Is this a new Pizza Hut ad campaign?
Or is he peddling purses again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. USA lied to Russia:
"The first President George Bush convinced his Soviet counterpart, Mikhail Gorbachev, that a free Eastern Europe and a united Germany would benefit the long-term interests of Russia. Gorbachev accepted Germany’s unification when he was assured that NATO would not be extended to the East. “Not one inch!” were the exact words of the reply made by Secretary of State James Baker."

That promise was then broken, first by the Clinton administration, then by George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Perhaps we should....
divide Germany again as a gesture of good faith :)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wonder why countries so close to Russia even want to join NATO? They know it will antagonize
Russia which is the giant next door. They would be better off to join a Russia-sponsored military alliance or just stay totally neutral like Switzerland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. For god's sake, no country should ever do anything to antagonize Russia!
Maybe we should suggest the same thing to Latin American countries regarding the US?

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. NATO was created to isolate and
contain Russia. So . . . I'm not really sure what his point is.

And in light of Russias recent actions I can see why so many former soviet vassals are considering joining up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC