Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Tactics Endorsed In Secret Memos-Waterboarding Got White House Nod

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-08 11:32 PM
Original message
CIA Tactics Endorsed In Secret Memos-Waterboarding Got White House Nod
Edited on Tue Oct-14-08 11:33 PM by kpete
Source: Washington Post

CIA Tactics Endorsed In Secret Memos
Waterboarding Got White House Nod

The Bush administration issued a pair of secret memos to the CIA in 2003 and 2004 that explicitly endorsed the agency's use of interrogation techniques such as waterboarding against al-Qaeda suspects -- documents prompted by worries among intelligence officials about a possible backlash if details of the program became public.

The classified memos, which have not been previously disclosed, were requested by then-CIA Director George J. Tenet more than a year after the start of the secret interrogations, according to four administration and intelligence officials familiar with the documents. Although Justice Department lawyers, beginning in 2002, had signed off on the agency's interrogation methods, senior CIA officials were troubled that White House policymakers had never endorsed the program in writing.

The memos were the first -- and, for years, the only -- tangible expressions of the administration's consent for the CIA's use of harsh measures to extract information from captured al-Qaeda leaders, the sources said. As early as the spring of 2002, several White House officials, including then-national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and Vice President Cheney, were given individual briefings by Tenet and his deputies, the officials said. Rice, in a statement to congressional investigators last month, confirmed the briefings and acknowledged that the CIA director had pressed the White House for "policy approval."



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/14/AR2008101403331.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. So what? Ain't like we'd impeach over it.
Just means Obama can do it if he feels like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I say Obama should allow waterboarding
...of Cheney and Bush, then discontinue the policy.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Directly connects WH to war crimes


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. So what? How about War Crimes Tribunals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
39. Thank you, Nancy Pelosi Disaster!
You have coddled the criminals, and one day all of us will pay the price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayjanDem Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
50. Yep
With the exception of Kucinich, the Democrats won't line these bastards up for some "please raise your right hand" Q&A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh well...it's not as if war crimes are a bad thing in America
We have a war criminal executive and America is A-OK with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yes, notice the use of the euphemism, "harsh measures..."
It's torture you nimwits!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Yes..but America pretends otherwise
Edited on Wed Oct-15-08 05:44 AM by Solly Mack
and will continue to do so

And as always, my government is welcomed to prove me wrong anytime it feels like it

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. Downing Street Memo.. DejaVu all over again....
... If this doesn't bring people to their feet... I don't know what will....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush and Cheney should be getting their affairs in order. They're going to be indicted.
If they aren't, this will happen again in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. They should be indicted but by whom?
The Cheney administration probably plastered on the immunity with its own memos from Bush that preclude a US indictement, let alone prosecution.


What nation on earth can push its force of will into an international arrest warrant that a majority of other nations would recognize and enforce?

The take away lesson on this one is gonna be the awful lesson of civilized behavior melting under bare naked power--get enoough power and you can be brazen enough to do anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. The Democrats in Congress and the Senate of course!
:spray: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Sorry ... I couldn't keep a straight face!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. Can *'s failure to recognize the International Criminal Court save him from prosecution?
On July 1, the International Criminal Court opened its doors for business in The Hague. President Bush has made clear that he wants no part of it.

Indeed, the Bush administration feels so strongly about this issue that the United States is insisting that before any American troops are assigned to peacekeeping missions, there must be immunity from World Court prosecution - not only for the soldiers but also for all the policymakers involved in committing the soldiers.

-snip

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20020705.html

Don't you like his excuse that he was protecting "peace keeping troop"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Who would Jesus Waterboard?
Bush reads his Bible every day so it's okay to do as he pleases.

GOP/PNAC/NeoCON "Morality and Family Values" are about like the Morality and Family Values the GESTAPO displayed.

He's John McCain and he approved of this madness, after he was against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. White House memos endorsed CIA waterboarding: report
Source: Reuters, via Yahoo

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration explicitly endorsed the use of waterboarding and other harsh interrogation methods against al Qaeda suspects in a pair of secret memos to the CIA in 2003 and 2004, The Washington Post reported on Wednesday.

The previously undisclosed classified memos were requested by then CIA Director George Tenet more than a year after the start of the secret interrogations, the newspaper reported, citing administration and intelligence officials familiar with the documents.

A White House spokesman had no comment on the report.

According the newspaper, intelligence officials sought cover from the White House because they were worried about a possible backlash if details of the interrogation program became public.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081015/us_nm/us_security_interrogation_memos;_ylt=AjrJr2agYkjWCwUS3lHyJE2s0NUE



I wonder why this came out in the middle of the night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. MONSTERS!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Really, is anyone shocked by this?
Or horrified? The fact is, this administration has made the horrifying the mundane. Things that at one time would have the citizenry screaming in the streets and demanding justice have become ho-hum. But really, does anyone think these things haven't been going on forever? That this is all new and unprecedented? Hell, no. It's just that you are not supposed to be so blatant and obvious about it. They have been like the most inept serial killer ever that keeps getting away with it, fingerprints and blood everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
51. No, of course not. The shock is it made the Corpo media.
A further shock would be if any of our fearless leaders did anything about it. I guess I'll call mine, for all the good it will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. GEORGE W. BUSH APPROVES OF TORTURE.
America TORTURES people.

So much for the "moral high road" and being "better than Saddam Hussein".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Bush LIES and LIES and LIES and LIES, and then he LIES some more in the face of evidence.
Edited on Wed Oct-15-08 08:05 AM by L. Coyote
Bush knew this the whole while he was lying and lying and lying!! Why isn't his support below 5 percent? Probably because of all the LIES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. They are what we know them to be: War Criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desktop Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. Cheney gives his Official response
...So....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. Helloooo Nancy Pelosi...Why the hell aren't you doing anything to hold this WH accountable??
Nancy, you need to be investigated!! Are your husband's business dealings profiting from Bush's crimes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
38. Like Diane Feinstein..whose husband has the 3rd largest Contract in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #38
44. We're not suppose to eat our own, but I want these two dealt with in a court of law. ..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
53. They have been woven into the web
I think the Clintons have been woven into the web also. Too cozy to the Republicans for me .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Sure the Clintons are in there. When Hillary was running for her second term....
...in the Senate, the GOP did nothing to unseat her. On the night of the NYS primaries, it was reported that 80 districts went without a single vote for Obama. How could we believe that not one person in Harlem, NY voted for Obama.

Once sniper-gate happened, the power brokers dropped Hillary and put all their support toward McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
21. This is the evidence the courts need to convict on war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
22. Frog march the bastards to the Hague!
Take McSame with them too!

Inhuman bastards one and all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:07 AM
Original message
Didn't Sy Hersch say the same thing already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertDevereaux Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
24. GODDAMN IT, IMPEACH THESE BASTARDS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriought Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
25. Put on your tin-foil hat and consider this...
President Bush has granted himself sweeping new powers, (aided and abetted by a cowed congress)The first combat team of the Third Brigade has now been deployed in the United States ("Posse Comitatus, we don't need no stinkin' Posse Comitatus) Osama Bin Laden was allowed to run free; free to pursue more adventures in Terrorism, and it looks as if we might soon elect an honorable, law-abiding president.
Just how frightened might the Bush administration be of being jailed for promoting torture? Frightened enough to give us an "October Surprise" that would be the Mother of all October Surprises?
I'm Mark. Be sure to stop by and say hello. I'll be in the "Freedom Security Camp No. 7"

I sincerely hope that's a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veracity Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
26. CIA Tactics Endorsed In Secret Memos
Source: Washington Post

The Bush administration issued a pair of secret memos to the CIA in 2003 and 2004 that explicitly endorsed the agency's use of waterboarding and other interrogation techniques against al-Qaeda suspects -- documents prompted by worries among intelligence officials about a possible backlash if details of the program became public.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/14/AR2008101403331.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Those poor soldiers on the bottom rung. Played for fools. They sanctioned
Edited on Tue Oct-14-08 10:48 PM by higher class
these people to allow their lowest animal superiority instincts to reign terror on these people who were yanked out of their homes on a fishing expedition or because a neighbor got a bounty for reporthing phony suspisions to the U.S. Government leaders and military services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Guess it's getting a little late to impeach....
As recently as last month, the administration had never publicly acknowledged that its policymakers knew about the specific techniques, such as waterboarding, that the agency used against high-ranking terrorism suspects. In her unprecedented account to lawmakers last month, Rice, now secretary of state, portrayed the White House as initially uneasy about a controversial CIA plan for interrogating top al-Qaeda suspects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. It's Never Too Late To Send Them to the HAGUE
Edited on Tue Oct-14-08 11:13 PM by AndyTiedye
The International Criminal Court exists because of people like them!

The International Criminal Court is located in the Palace of Peace in the Hague


I am sure they will have a great deal to discuss with them


It also has its own prison


Hope they are prepared for a long stay, because the ICC doesn't take Presidential pardons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. HOLD THAT THOUGHT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. So when does the trial start?
Are you getting any of this, Nancy? You said you'd impeach if someone showed you a crime Bush and Cheney committed. Well, there it is!

Nancy? Are you still there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porschenut1066 Donating Member (348 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. G.W.H.Bush said at a Washington dinner party
"If the American people ever find out what the Bush family has done to this country, they would take us all out and hang us from the nearest lamp post"

So I guess he knows and is hoping we don't find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Wow! As difficult as it is to believe, a Bush finally speaks the truth.
The Bush family has been a cancer on the American body politic for generations. Time for a radical Bushectomy to save our nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. Hmmmf. Never needed the WaPo to confirm what we have known all along. Better late than never I
suppose. Now when are the trials for war crimes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
40. Off Topic
I see that Democratic Underground is now altering the timestamps and dates of OPs and post commenters.

veracity Oct-15-08 06:14 AM #26
higher class Oct-15-08 06:14 AM #27
SimpleTrend Oct-15-08 06:14 AM #28
AndyTiedye Oct-15-08 06:14 AM #30
Phred42 Oct-15-08 06:14 AM #32
bobd0 Oct-15-08 06:14 AM #29
Porschenut1066 Oct-15-08 06:14 AM #31
bobd0 Oct-15-08 06:14 AM #33



I know that I commented last night on that thread, that in my timezone, was Oct 14, late in the evening. Also note how many people allegedly commented at the exact same time and date. I also recall those posts happening over several hours.

I guess that since timezones and dates are a legal matter, I wonder what the implications are for moderators altering post times and dates? It may be preferable for the entire OP and posts to simply be deleted, rather than to claim they occurred at a time and date when they, in fact, did not. Besides that data becoming "a lie", it also seems rather fantastic. It creates a history that did not, in fact, occur as claimed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
torbird Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
35. D'Oh!
Oliver Stone is soooo pissed right now! Why didn't this come out before he made "W."?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
36. rate this story up on Yahoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnmoderatedem Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
37. ya but we only torture the bad guys.

so what's the beef? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underdoggie Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
41. GOD TOO?
DOTH THIS MEAN THAT THE BLESSINGS OF H2O BOARDING ART ALSO APPROVED BY
MERCIFUL GOD (the JewdeoJescusian version)
AND HIS WRATHFUL ONLY BEGOTTEN SON WHO ART IN HEAVEN??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
torbird Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Um, yes?
Are you there, God? It's me, Mar--glug! Glug! Mmmrph!! Help! Glug! Glug!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
43. If you live in Vermont, vote for Charlotte Dennett for Attorney General.
She will give these traitors the justice they deserve:


Vermont AG candidate says she would prosecute Bush for murder

A local candidate in Vermont has promised to charge and prosecute President Bush for murder if elected as that state's attorney general.

The Associated Press reports that Charlotte Dennett, who's running on the Progressive Party ticket to be Vermont's Attorney General, promised to appoint a special prosecutor to bring charges holding Bush accountable for the deaths of more than 4,000 troops in Iraq.

Dennet, speaking at a press conference in Burlington this week, said she would appoint Vincent Bugliosi as a special prosecutor in the case. A former Los Angeles County district attorney who was in charge of Charles Manson's murder case, Bugliosi has outlined his strategy against the president in his recent book, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder.

"Someone has to step forward," Dennett said at a news conference with Bugliosi, according to AP. "Someone has to say we cannot put up with this lack of accountability any more."

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Vermont_AG_candidate_says_she_would_0919.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
45. The CIA should have been dissolved long ago --
probably ran the JFK coup -- which was basically a coup on US government --

and is a vile and corrupt murderous outfit --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
46. And this is a surprise why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johan helge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
47. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
48. In our country of evangelical nuts this is not nearly as bad as getting some head in office.
Torture vs sex, torture will always win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
49. So? Is Pelosi or anyone else up there going to do anything about it?
I won't hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tclambert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
52. I've wanted to see a President go to jail since Nixon.
You young 'uns may not remember back to a time when one of America's high ideals was: "No one is above the law." Then Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon. Haven't heard anyone say "No one is above the law" since then. What a statement of our dedication to justice it would be to send George W. Bush from the White House to the Big House.

But I just don't think it will happen. I have a feeling President Obama will try to strike a tone of reconciliation and cooperation with the Republicans after the election. And letting George Walker Bush off with no more than a stern warning might be part of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
55. Hmm... Sound illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
56. Bush/Rove/Cheney post when its found they did something legally.
Now that would be NEWS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
57. Sadly, it's too late to impeach the fucker. However, an international
tribunal investigating Bush's war crimes might be interested. Who could head such a panel? I nominate Hugo Chavez--not that my nomination means anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC