Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bolivian unrest ruled 'massacre'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 06:16 AM
Original message
Bolivian unrest ruled 'massacre'
Source: BBC News

Page last updated at 01:11 GMT, Thursday, 4 December 2008
Bolivian unrest ruled 'massacre'

A commission investigating the killing of 20 Bolivians during protests in an opposition-controlled province has described it as a "massacre".

Bolivian President Evo Morales says he welcomes the findings into the deaths in September. "Conspiring against democracy...using terrorism...it's not the best way," Mr Morales said.

The commission recommends those responsible for the deaths be tried for murder in Bolivian courts.

The opposition has dismissed the report as biased and politically motivated.

~SNIP~
Unveiling the commission's findings on behalf of the 12-member panel, Argentine legal expert Rodolfo Mattarollo said some of the 20 mostly Morales supporters were killed in what he called "a massacre under the UN definition of the word".

He said some of the killers worked for Pando's opposition-controlled provincial government.




Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7764001.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. AFP: International panel calls killings in Bolivia a massacre
International panel calls killings in Bolivia a massacre
3 Dec 2008, 2200 hrs IST, AFP

LA PAZ: Twenty indigenous people were killed in a politically charged "massacre" in September in Bolivia's restive Pando region, an international investigative panel said Wednesday.

Argentine legal expert Rodolfo Mattarolo handed the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) report to President Evo Morales, who is Bolivia's first indigenous president.

Mattarolo said that so far the deaths of 20 people had been confirmed in the bloodshed in Porvenir, Pando, in what he called "a massacre under the UN definition of the word," on September 11, 2008. He said Bolivian civilian courts could handle the murder cases.

The panel was set up September 15 after an emergency UNASUR meeting in Santiago on political violence in Bolivia between backers and opponents of Morales.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/Rest_of_World/International_panel_calls_killings_in_Bolivia_a_massacre/articleshow/3789462.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Reuters: Bolivia violence was massacre, says regional report 03 Dec 2008 18:21:30 GMT
Bolivia violence was massacre, says regional report 03 Dec 2008 18:21:30 GMT
Source: Reuters
By Eduardo Garcia

LA PAZ, Dec 3 (Reuters) - A regional commission investigating the killings of at least 20 Bolivians during anti-government protests in September described the incident as a massacre on Wednesday.

The Unasur group of South American nations vowed to probe the killings, which took place in an Amazon province as anti-government protesters attacked natural gas pipelines and stormed public buildings.

The unrest flared during a bitter power struggle between leftist President Evo Morales and conservative rivals opposed to his drive to implement a new constitution.

Unveiling his findings on behalf of the 12-member panel, commission head Rodolfo Mattarollo said some of the 20 mostly Morales supporters killed in Pando province were murdered.

Mattarollo, an Argentine lawyer and Human Rights expert, said that some of the killers worked for Pando's opposition-controlled provincial government.

"On Sept. 11 2008, in the village of Porvenir and other places in the Pando province, a massacre occurred," he said, presenting the commission's report in the presidential palace.

As the turmoil raged in the sparsely-populated region near the Brazilian border, several South American leaders issued a statement of support for Morales and warned his opponents not to stir unrest in the natural-gas rich Andean nation.

More:
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N03320879.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amyrose2712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I just wanted to thank you again for taking the time to post...
about these issues. I have been very busy with work and have not been able to keep up with things as well as when I was out on disability. You are an extreme help. Although, I wish you had a journal so I could follow your posts better. Peace. By the way, what is your opinion of Xavier Becerra as Rep of Trade? I don't know much about him but he seem like a good pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ditto. Thanks as always to Judi Lynn
And not to worry: Hillary "I love Uribe & Plan Colombia" Kissinger ... er, Clinton is on the way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Ouch! Hey, thanks for that painful reminder, judasdisney. Really enjoy your posts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Becerra was a staff member for Art Torres. That's a good sign. He held out for
help for homeowners in the Bushwhack Financial 9/11 looting bill. He voted against it, because it did not contain such help. Another good sign. I'll look for more.

The son of immigrants, raised in Sacramento, CA. Long time Los Angeles Congressman.

See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xavier_Becerra

(Side note: He's very good looking--resembles that Ecuadoran "Apollo," President Rafael Correa. I hope he has the same fire in his belly for justice.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. More. He's looking good. Here's what David Sirota says...
"Getting a U.S. Trade Representative who is on record against the NAFTA trade model and with votes against CAFTA and Oman is a huge change from both the Bush administration and the Clinton administration. And it's not just a good pick because it's a change from really bad Trade Representatives, the selection itself is good - and way, way, way better than what it could have been. The selection suggests Obama is serious about reforming our trade policies, and it should be applauded."

http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2008124902/nafta-critic-selected-us-trade-representative

But Sirota also says (as a prelim to the above paragraph)

"Beccera hasn't accepted yet, but if he does, my initial reaction is that this is a solid choice. No, it's not perfect - Beccera voted for the landmark China PNTR deal in 2000 and for the Peru Free Trade Agreement. But perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the damn good."

-----

Good sign: Business Week doesn't like him. See

http://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2008/12/xavier-becerra-may-be-the-new-ustr.html

"What little is known about his record has raised concerns among business sources and other free trade advocates. 'We’re pretty concerned about some of the past statements he’s made on issues such as Nafta,' says one well-plugged in business lobbyist."

:rofl:

----

Opposed the war on Iraq from the beginning.

http://becerra.house.gov/HoR/CA31/Issues/2007+New+Direction.htm

----

Page about issues he's worked on. He's a bit too pumped up about the accomplishments of the Diebold II Congress (of the 10% approval rating), but he's in a leadership role (Chr, Ways & Means) and I guess has to frame it that way. This provides a sense of what he approves/doesn't approve of.

http://becerra.house.gov/HoR/CA31/Issues/2007+New+Direction.htm

-----

I'm looking for any position he may have taken on 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY vote counting, with the secret code owned and controlled by rightwing Bushwhack corporations, with virtually no audit/recount controls. Will report back here if I find anything. 25% of the Democrats in the House, during the Anthrax Congress, voted against the "Help America Vote For Bush Act" (Oct 02) (--$3.9 billion e-voting boondoggle). I hope he's one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. YES! HALLELUJAH! HE VOTED AGAINST "HAVA"!!!!
He was one of the 48 members of the House (vs. 357) who voted NO! on the "Help America Vote for Bush Act," that scurrilous, traitorous piece of shit legislation, designed by convicted felons Bob Ney and Tom Delay to destroy our election system once and for all, with 100% non-transparent 'TRADE SECRET' vote counting.

He was one of the brave! One of the true patriots! This is so wonderful! Here is the Roll Call:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll462.xml

--------

Well, I'm sold! I don't care so much now that he voted for that wretched Peru "free trade" deal. After the labor Democrats got labor and environmental protections ON PAPER in that trade deal, it may have been hard to vote against it.

Anybody who voted against "HAVA" is okay by me. That took extraordinary courage in the Anthrax Congress (as did a vote against the war). And it speaks to Becerra's fundamental belief in democracy. When he finds out what that corrupt asshole, Alan Garcia, is doing in Peru, he may change his mind about that trade deal, and now he is in a position to DO something about it.

Lord knows I don't have any illusions about our political system, or about Obama, but this gives me hope. And it is the first appointment by Obama that has done so.

Truly, a vote against HAVA is my litmus test. Now we'll see if my litmus test is a good one.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Becerra's take on CAFTA
While Saca accused CAFTA’s critics of turning a job-creating trade pact into a “political pinata,” Rep. Xavier Becerra, (D-Los Angeles), told the crowd that he “believed in a CAFTA but not this CAFTA” because the legal protections for workers were not as strong as those for products and intellectual property.

“I learned from NAFTA that good intentions are no substitute for enforceability of rules,” said Becerra, a lawyer who supported NAFTA’s passage in 1994.

http://articles.latimes.com/2004/aug/23/business/fi-cafta23
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amyrose2712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I hope you don't mind...
I have redirected people to your OP about Eric Holder and Chiquita. I did give credit to you each time. I just thought it was important for people to read. Thanks, also to you. You also have made a large contribution to educating DUers about Latin America, especially our oppression there. Thanks a lot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. The divisive issue of Cuba drove Lincoln Díaz-Balart from the Hispanic Caucus in 1997
The divisive issue of Cuba drove Lincoln Díaz-Balart from the Hispanic Caucus in 1997. He and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, another Cuban-American Republican from Miami, quit the caucus in disgust after the incoming chairman at the time, Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., visited Havana and criticized the U.S. embargo.

http://www.latinamericanpost.com/index.php?mod=seccion&secc=74&conn=2405

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Just saw Peace Patriot's information on this man. I was in the same boat with you on Becerra.
Was completely unacquainted with him, started to look for material the other day when I saw his name for the first time, and had to leave before getting anywhere, didn't finish my search.

If I find info. later I'll be sure to post it.

Glad to hear your health is improving, and glad to know you're among the DU'ers who are determined to find out more about our neighbors in this hemisphere who've been seeing the very worst our country has had to offer, to our great sorrow. Hope they make it out of the hell they've been suffering all these long years due to filthy, brutal, greedy, completely unscrupulous politicans here, and their greedy scum-puppets within Latin American countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Reactionary Rampage: The Paramilitary Massacre in Bolivia
Reactionary Rampage: The Paramilitary Massacre in Bolivia
Email Print
Share: digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook buzzflash

Sep 16 2008
Forrest Hylton
Bolivian President Evo Morales’ expulsion of US Ambassador Phillip Goldberg on September 10 for alleged coup plotting sparked the latest diplomatic crisis in the Americas. But the diplomatic fallout has overshadowed the internal dynamics that led to the massacre of some 30 campesinos with perhaps as many as 40 more disappeared in El Porvenir, Pando, near Bolivia’s northeastern border with Brazil. The massacre coincided with the 35th anniversary of the violent overthrow of socialist president Salvador Allende in Chile.

The massacre in El Porvenir was the worst in Bolivia since right-wing President Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada presided over the slaughter of more than 70 unarmed protestors in October 2003. This time, however, the violence was not orchestrated by the central government, but by regional officials: departmental prefects in league with civic committees. Administratively organized similar to France, Bolivia is divided into nine departments, each run by a prefect, while civic committees are made up of a handful of unelected, local, commercial-landed elites who preside over one of the most unequal distributions of land and wealth in the world. These public- and private-sector authorities, in turn, are allied with cypto-fascist paramilitary youth gangs armed with baseball bats, clubs, chains, guns, and in the case of the massacre at El Porvenir, official vehicles. These groups have made Bolivia’s eastern lowlands ungovernable for the Morales administration.

It may be helpful for U.S. readers to consider Bolivia’s eastern lowlands as analogous to Dixie. In the 1950s and 60s, working with governors and mayors of states and localities, white supremacist paramilitary groups terrorized African Americans. The campaign of terror was intended to preserve a status quo that benefited a tiny class of wealthy white landowners, against which the federal government—under Eisenhower and Kennedy—hesitated to act.

Imagine, though, that African Americans had comprised an overwhelming majority of the U.S. population, that Kennedy was Black, and that he had come to power on the back of serial insurrections led by African Americans. Imagine that, in response, white supremacists not only massacred Blacks, but also blockaded roads, blew up oil pipelines, and burned and looted federal government offices and installations.

The limits of the analogy with the Jim Crow south are significant, but another analogy—from a century earlier, the 1850s and 60s—transcends them. The southern secessionist movement sought to preserve the republic of slavery and extend it through the west to the Pacific. The movement mobilized a mass following and mounted an armed challenge to the federal government. Such analogies help convey the virulence of what one commentator has labeled a “revolt of the rich,” as well as the scope of the challenge posed by a wealthy white minority to a government backed by a majority of workers and campesinos of Indian descent, a government without historical precedent.

More:
http://nacla.org/node/5021
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Bolivia to distribute land to indigenous Indians
Bolivia to distribute land to indigenous Indians
Irish Sun
Wednesday 3rd December, 2008
(IANS)

The Bolivian government will buy land for distribution among members of indigenous Indian communities living in virtual serfdom, EFE reported Wednesday.

Juan Carlos Rojas, chief of the National Institute for Agrarian Reform, told reporters Tuesday that the measure would benefit the indigenous communities in the eastern and southern provinces of Santa Cruz, Chuquisaca and Tarija.

Bolivia's indigenous Indian communities live in appalling indigence with little access to education or health care.

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights had pointed out in its report in June that the Guarani Indians in Chaco area are living under 'a situation of servitude analogous to slavery.'

More:
http://story.irishsun.com/index.php/ct/9/cid/2411cd3571b4f088/id/437763/cs/1/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. Murderous lynch mobs spark safety fears in Bolivia
snip
The government of Evo Morales—the first indigenous president in South America—has shown some understanding for the attacks. Speaking to Radio Erbol, Bolivia's deputy interior minister, Ruben Gamarra acknowledged that the incident was “a reaction of the public by virtue of the fact that they have no confidence in the actions of prosecutors and the judiciary.” One of the alleged thieves was an off-duty policeman.


snip
Since the attack, a pact of silence has been declared in the Aymara town. There are no police here now and the army is keeping a low profile. Strangers are viewed with suspicion and journalists are in danger. There is little government representation since the mayor declared civil law. It seems unlikely anyone will ever be charged.



snip
Critics, such as Human Rights Watch, say the constitutional recognition of community justice “endangers some of the fundamental rights of Bolivian citizens”. The violent incident in Achacachi feeds the worst fears and prejudices of the mestizo population (European descendant Bolivians) in the lowlands of this deeply divided country.



http://russiatoday.com/news/news/34249
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Statement by the Maryknoll missionaries in Bolivia
A message from the Maryknoll Global Concerns Bolivia group

September 2008

The following statement was prepared by Maryknoll missioners living and working in Bolivia.

On Wednesday, September 10, Bolivia’s President Evo Morales pronounced the U.S. ambassador to Bolivia, Phillip Goldberg, persona non grata, a step that required Goldberg to leave his post. President Morales has accused Ambassador Goldberg of meddling in the internal affairs of Bolivia by supporting the opposition groups and fomenting violent conflict among the Bolivian people.

In response, on September 11 the United States government asked the Bolivian ambassador in the U.S., Gustavo Guzman, to leave. On September 14, Morales restated Bolivia’s desire to have full diplomatic relations with the U.S. and reiterated that his concerns were the result of actions that Goldberg had engaged in his diplomatic capacity.

During Goldberg’s tenure as the U.S. ambassador in Bolivia:
  • We have witnessed a lack of respect for President Morales, his government, and for the overwhelming majority of Bolivians who support him by Goldberg.
  • Embassy officials asked Peace Corps volunteers and a Fulbright scholar in Bolivia to gather intelligence information on behalf of the U.S. Embassy, violating U.S. and Bolivian law.
  • Goldberg has acted imprudently and callously when the internal situation clearly called for wise and skillful diplomacy.
Lack of respect

In September 2007 when President Morales traveled to the United Nations in New York, he was made to sit on the tarmac of Kennedy International Airport for two hours for unexplained security reasons. Upon recounting the experience President Morales suggested that if this was the way the foreign leaders were to be treated in New York then perhaps the United Nations should be moved to another country. When asked by the Bolivian press about the event, Ambassador Goldberg flippantly commented that Morales will complain that Disneyland ought to be moved to Oruro (a city in the Bolivian high plane). For most Bolivians the comments were seen as an insult to their president.

Many of us have attended the “town meetings” that the ambassador holds periodically for U.S. citizens in Bolivia. In this forum, we have listened to Goldberg make disparaging remarks and use inappropriate humor when speaking about Morales and Bolivians in general. At one such meeting he made jokes about the public lynching two women.

Intelligence gathering

In December 2007 a New York Times article reported that in November a Fulbright scholar in Bolivia was asked by an Embassy official to gather intelligence information about Venezuelans and Cubans in the country, including their names, their activities, and their movements. It then was further revealed that in July 2007 the same embassy official asked a handful of Peace Corps volunteers to gather similar intelligence. At the time Peace Corps officials registered a complaint with the Embassy, but no action was taken at the time to remove the person under Goldberg’s command even though his request was in clear violation of Peace Corps policy and rules.

Imprudent diplomacy

Recently, as a very tense and volatile situation was developing between the Morales administration and opposition groups, Goldberg took the highly controversial step of meeting in private with the prefect of the Department of Santa Cruz and major opposition leader Ruben Costas on August 25. Costas himself is a highly polarizing figure who has publicly called Morales a “small monkey” and “murderous.” Bolivian media sources say that the youth unions involved in violent and racist activities act on orders from opposition leaders like Costas. Goldberg met with the prefect of the Chuquisaca prefect, also an opposition leader, around the same time. Soon after these meetings youth unions and other opposition groups began to destroy and sack state institutions, blew up a natural gas duct, and blocked the major roads connecting the eastern lowlands with the rest of the country. It was the suspicion that Goldberg created by holding these meetings that resulted in the Bolivian president’s decision to pronounce him persona non grata.

Recent events behind the conflict

This feud between the U.S. and Bolivia unfolded as opposition groups began a violent campaign across the eastern lowlands in the wake of the August 10 recall referendum in which the Bolivian people validated their support for President Morales by giving him 67 percent of the vote. While opposition leaders also won their referendums reflecting the regional support they hold, it was clear that Morales and his government have widespread and national support, representing what the vast majority of Bolivians want for their country.

Immediately following the referendum Morales invited his political opponents to dialogue. However, opposition leaders in the eastern part of the country rejected dialogue as a means to resolve differences and began to provoke conflict. It was in the days following the referendum that Costas gave incendiary speeches laced with racist overtones in which he called Morales a “monkey” and “murderous” and labeled Morales’ politics as trying to impose an “Aymara fundamentalism” (the Aymara are a large indigenous group from Bolivia’s high planes). He and other opposition prefects also continued to openly violate the nation’s constitution by refusing to fulfill their legal duties as departmental prefects and began to threaten to take over state institutions justifying these actions based on their own self-imposed autonomy statutes.

On August 28, Morales decreed a referendum on the proposed new constitution for Bolivia. Calls for a new constitution began in 1990 and became part of the national agenda in 2003. Two keys issues that the new constitution addresses are de-centralization of the government through departmental and other forms of autonomy, and land reform. The opposition in the eastern part of the country, made up of a small wealthy elite who controls most of the land, seek to impose their own form of departmental autonomy that would maintain their political and economic privileges and resist any kind of land reform.

When the National Electoral Court ruled that such a referendum could not be decreed the Morales administration began to work out an agreement with the Bolivian congress for advancing the referendum on the new constitution. Furthermore, Morales offered concessions on a key issue regarding hydrocarbons revenues in attempts to again open dialogue with the opposition prefects. However, instead of reining in the protests of their supporters, the opposition prefects in Santa Cruz, Beni, Tarija, and Pando escalated the conflict. On September 7, 8, and 9 groups with direct links to opposition leaders, in a series of actions, destroyed and sacked state institutions, blew up the natural gas duct between Bolivia and Brazil, and violently blocked major highways. They also assaulted individuals who they suspected to be Morales supporters. For example, they beat women who work as vendors in the main plaza of Santa Cruz simply because they wore the indigenous dress of the Quechua and Aymara Indians. During these attacks police and military showed restraint and did not fire a single shot.

On September 11, in the rural community of Porvenir in the northern department of Pando, the conflict turned deadly when local farmers and supporters of Morales, heading to the departmental capitol, Cobija, were intercepted by a well armed and organized group – some say a paramilitary force - aligned with the prefect of Pando, Leopoldo Fernandez, a wealthy landowner and an opponent of Morales. The violence left at least 25 dead and reports of 106 missing, overwhelmingly the rural farmers. In the face of such death and violence the Morales administration had to act and therefore began to impose a state of emergency affecting only the department of Pando. As military forces retook the airport in Cobija, they met armed resistance from supporters of Fernandez which resulted in the death of one soldier and two civilians.

More:
http://www.maryknollogc.org/regional/latinamerica/100708.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. After Violence, U.S. Role in Bolivia Questioned
After Violence, U.S. Role in Bolivia Questioned
September 24, 2008 10:06 AM EDT
Haider Rizvi, OneWorld US

NEW YORK, Sep 22 (OneWorld) - As tensions remain high between government and opposition in Bolivia, where more than 30 people have been killed in politically motivated attacks in recent days, a group of Latin America experts are calling for Washington to clarify its engagement in the internal affairs of Bolivia.

The U.S. government needs to "turn a new page" in its relations with Latin America, says an open letter addressed to U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and John McCain, as well as other top U.S. officials.

Nearly 100 leading academics and foreign policy experts signed the letter last Friday, voicing their "deep concern" over the recent events in Bolivia that left dozens dead and cost millions of dollars in lost revenue to the developing nation.

The letter's signers, who represent dozens of top U.S. schools -- including New York University, the University of Maryland, and Johns Hopkins University -- as well as Latin America think tanks and journalists, said they were especially concerned about Washington's support for groups and individuals in Bolivia who are using violent means to oppose -- and potentially overthrow -- the popularly elected government of President Evo Morales.

More:
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?memberId=-1&grpId=3659174697240991&articleId=281474977457794
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC