Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nixon ordered Watergate break-in, aide says now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:26 PM
Original message
Nixon ordered Watergate break-in, aide says now
By BILL STRAUB
Scripps Howard News Service
July 26, 2003

President Richard Nixon personally ordered the "third-rate burglary" at the Watergate Hotel in June 1972, a trusted aide has now revealed, resurrecting the scandal that led to Nixon's political ruin and forced him from the nation's highest office.

Jeb Stuart Magruder, who was Nixon's assistant communications director before moving to the re-election committee, said he was privy to a telephone conversation between Nixon and John Mitchell, the campaign chairman, in which the president urged Mitchell to proceed with a break-in at the Democratic National Committee offices in the Watergate.

The revelation, if true, places the Watergate burglary in a new historical light. Though never concretely established, it generally was felt that Nixon was not involved in the break-in itself, only in the cover-up that occurred after the fact - an involvement that forced him to resign from office on Aug. 9, 1974.

http://www.knoxstudio.com/shns/story.cfm?pk=NIXON-WATERGATE-07-26-03&cat=WW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. gee
I hope this relevation doesn't tarnish Nixon's reputation.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah
now he'll never get onto Mount Rushmore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Nah. Ford was smart enough to pardon Nixon.
Nixon is scot-free now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kclown Donating Member (459 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Ford pardoned Nixon before the 1976 election
Like him or not, Ford had the guts to pardon him before the
election and make it an election issue.  He lost.  Carter
would have been under considerable pressure to do the same
thing.

Let's move on to more recent pardons.  E.G., who pardoned Neil
Bush in 1992?  I'll let everyone guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
33. Proof? Source? Neil Bush wasn't convicted so he wasn't pardoned.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Pardons can be Pre-Emptive and often are
Nixon was pardoned without ever being convicted of anything.

Speaking of pardons. Does anyone have a complete list of the people pardoned on Christmas Eve 1992 by GHW Bush ? Some of those were pre-emptive. Was Neil in that batch of pardons ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #34
50. Oh, ok, thanks, I didn't know that. But did Clinton pardon Neil Bush?
That is what the poster I replied to was implying and I couldn't find that in Google at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrdinaryTa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Twisting Slowly in the Wind
it generally was felt that Nixon was not involved in the break-in itself

The fact that the obdurate Nixon thought it better to resign than fight speaks volumes about what really happened. The Watergate prosecutors hadn't even begun to squeeze the burglars themselves. It would have come out that Nixon was, indeed, a crook.

What a satisfying ending that was! Nixon, arrogant bastard that he was, was finally humiliated. At the end, he had no friends willing to defend him. It can happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, it did happen, anyways.
I don't think we can draw many parallels to the current situation. Nixon was in charge and was a crook.

Bush is a puppet and is just dumb - i.e. not a crook.

The big challenge is reaching those pulling the puppet's strings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Bush is supposed to be in charge- that is the point
He has been acting as president since the Supreme Court got a black mark in the historical record for appointing him.

Like the last Republican disaster, Reagan got off by being brain dead, does Bush get a pass because he is incompetent?

His incompetency doesn't make him any less of a crook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Bush used to be Daddy's campaign enforcer.
The puppet is fully in agreement with every criminal act going down.

Please don't excuse that nasty piece of Barbara's work on the grounds of being too stupid to know what he's doing. He knows. He thinks it's great.

Because only good things happen to George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Don't be sure sure he's dumb just because he acts dumb.
He could well be just as evil as those who advise.

My recommendation is "don't misunderestimate him".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat in Tallahassee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I disagree, Bush is a crook and so is his whole family; they are like the
damned mafia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. Nixon was a crrok, regardless
Nixon was a crrok, regardless of whether he had forknowledge of the burglary or not. He was accused in the impeachment proceedings of obstracting the investigation of the burglary. That's the charge that stuck. There was more than enough evidence to prove that and send him to prison, had he not been pardoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Magruder
isn't exactly credible. He was once an associate pastor at my church. I boycotted and never met the man. I have no doubt (and never did) that Nixon ordered all kinds of laws broken. It is unfortunate that this revelation won't ever be accepted as historical fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. What kind of person would have Nixon confided *this* in?
Of course this guy isn't credible! Look at what he knew about a President of the United States and look how long he waited to bring it out into the open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush Personally Lied To The American People
Edited on Sat Jul-26-03 07:47 PM by Democat
Will we have to wait 30 years for Bush aides to admit he's a liar and a crook?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Gee, would've been nice
if he hed piped up a little sooner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. I Thought That It Was Clinton's Penis
that ordered the break-in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. it was indeed
It can travel back in time, too.


Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. It WAS Clinton!
Edited on Sat Jul-26-03 08:26 PM by Maccagirl
Remember he was a coordinator for McGovern's Texas campaign-and HILLARY was right with him! OMG-it WAS Clinton! It was Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. George W. Nixon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neoplatonist Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I agree with you that it was Clinton's penis
Edited on Sat Jul-26-03 08:21 PM by Neoplatonist
Clinton's penis has supernatural powers afterall. It mesmerized the Republicans and mass media for 8 years--and still is to this day. It's so obvious: Nixon got telepathic messages from Clinton's penis and ordered the Watergate breakin. It's only logical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. It helps to remember that...
The rumors are that Clinton's Penis has a name:

Cthulhu.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Damn--you don't say!!
I always thought it was the Worm Ourobouros.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Why vote for the lesser evil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivory_Tower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
38. Every time I see that picture I think "Wilford Brimley"
Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #38
48. I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
37. Smile ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. Headline for 2031
Bush ordered 9-11, aide says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Yep, So It Will Be 31 Years Before We Are Told
the Shrub crime secrets. (You beat me to it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. NO that has to be revealed NOW!!!
OR investigated THOROUGHLY to beyond a reasonable doubt dispell the suspicion. Who's suspicion MY suspicion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. Washington Post has it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. CONSPIRACY THEORIES ....
MY ASS... when the truth needs telling it gets told. The lapse on it sucks though so many years after the fact. I think it was Napolean who said and I paraphrase, it is not a matter of censoring the truth, just delaying it awhile till it doesn't matter anymore.

but it is relevant NOW those investigating all contridication just have to ASK THE RIGHT QUESTIONS until they are answered.

We don't need confirmation that something is FOUL. Which is what these investigations usually reveal. We need to know WHO AND WHY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotesFromAnIntrovert Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
25. So, will we be reading/hearing in 2031 that Bush "personally ordered" ...
the theft of the 2000 election? 'Cause I'll push back sweet death for that admission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. You couldn't buy better timing for this to come out!
The parallels are hard to ignore between then and know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #26
36. The timing-- is Magruder trying to tell us something else ??
Maybe Magruder is encouraging someone in the current white house to face their Christian guilt and tell what they know.

God knows a bunch of them have to feel some guilt about what has and is happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Or maybe BushCo is pulling out the stops
and calling in old chits / issuing new threats to the Party Faithful that they need a new diversion to cover for Their Glorious Leader for the next 18 months or so. Rove, calling everyone telling them to let it out that Martians have landed, he doesn't care, just come up with something for the next few news cycles to draw attention from Their Glorious Leader and his feet of clay / mouth of sponge. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
28. What about those missing 18 minutes on those tapes?
Ah yes let us revisit watergate and why not go all the way to the bay of pigs Phase I and II. Shake the tree! Shake the tree!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. This is only a mild surprise to me
I always suspected that Nixon knew more than the official story allowed. He resigned after the smoking gun tape was released. In this tape, Nixon and Haldeman discuss the burglary and the ivestigation on June 23, 1972, only a few days after the break in.

HALDEMAN:okay -that's fine. Now, on the investigation, you
know, the Democratic break-in thing, we're back to the-in the, the problem area because the FBI is not under control, because Gray doesn't exactly know how to control them, and they have, their investigation is now leading into some productive areas, because they've been able to trace the money, not through the money itself, but through the bank, you know, sources - the banker himself. And, and it goes in some directions we don't want it to go. Ah, also there have been some things, like an informant came in off the street to the FBI in Miami, who was a photographer or has a friend who is a photographer who developed some films through this guy, Barker, and the films had pictures of Democratic National Committee letter head documents and things. So I guess, so it's things like that that are gonna, that are filtering in. Mitchell came up with yesterday, and John Dean analyzed very carefully last night and concludes, concurs now with Mitchell's recommendation that the only way to solve this, and we're set up beautifully to do it, ah, in that and that...the only network that paid any attention to it last night was NBC...they did a massive story on the Cuban...
PRESIDENT: That's right.
HALDEMAN: thing.
PRESIDENT: Right.
HALDEMAN: That the way to handle this now is for us to have Walters call Pat Gray and just say, "Stay the hell out of this...this is ah, business here we don't want you to go any further on it." That's not an unusual development,...
PRESIDENT: Um huh.
HALDEMAN: ...and, uh, that would take care of it.

All Haldeman says is that the FBI investigation is leading into some "productive areas." THat seems to be a very cryptic reference to the plumbers squad, but Nixon knows exactly what Haledman is saying. At least, he's not asking any questions about it.

One might expect Nixon to say, "What are you talking about, Bob?" But he doesn't. He knows. It always bothered me that he approved the cover up in a converstion where the details were left out and yet he seemed to understand just what they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. The mainest thing that bugged me about the pardon...
was that it preemptively stopped the direct investigation.


I didn't much care if he was pardoned after investigation, and even before trial.

But that was such a mindblowing set of cold, black and white facts that were emerging. I guess it was getting too much like staring at bad roadkill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. i agree. though i would have loved to see him in jail.
we missed uncovering historical facts, necessary for a full understanding for the american people. who knows what would have been revealed about nixon had the investigation or a trial been allowed to go forward.

ford did a major disservice to america by pardoning nixon, as does every president who pardons governmental criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
35. Why are all men with the name of "Jeb" / "JEB" such evil-doers?
I'm speaking of Jeb Stuart Magruder and JEB Bush. You can probably exclude the American Confederate Civil War soldier, Jeb Stuart. :-)

Is the name "Jeb" a bad omen? Do regular folks these days still name their children "Jeb"? Inquiring DU'ers want to know.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Ryalto Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. Jeb's name isn't Jeb
I believe it's John Ellis Bush, just another thing that bugs the shit out of me about that clan. Calling him "Jeb Bush" is like saying "John Ellis Bush Bush."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyAmerica Donating Member (186 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
42. Old News
Anybody who knows Nixon knows that nothing happened without Nixon's knowledge. He was a control freak. Sort of like Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlb Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
43. This doesn't add up.
" none of the investigators asked him what he knew about Nixon's participation."

These are the first people in 30 years to ask him about Nixon ? Does anyone seriously believe that.

" John Dean, Nixon's White House counsel who is credited with blowing the lid off the Watergate scandal, said via e-mail that he was unaware of the Nixon-Mitchell conversation until Magruder advised him about it a few weeks ago.

"I have never seen or heard a scintilla of evidence that Nixon was aware of these plans at the re-election committee," Dean said. "As best I know, based on both what I was told at the time, and subsequent information, Nixon learned of the break-in after the arrests at the Watergate. I have never had any evidence, either at the time or since, that anyone at the White House had advance knowledge of the Watergate break-in."

At the same time, Dean said, he can't dispute Magruder's characterization of the Nixon-Mitchell conversation because he wasn't present.

"I cannot imagine Jeb would lie about it," Dean said. "Nonetheless, I am very surprised he never provided this information when it could have been more critically tested. And I am also surprised that there is absolutely nothing on any of the Nixon tapes that might corroborate his statement."

-----

I wonder if we will hear in the next few weeks that Mcgruder is peddling a new book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
birdman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
45. I'm shocked ! shocked !
That President Nixon would order a burglary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
46. G Gordon Liddy is probably having a fit
Edited on Sun Jul-27-03 08:17 AM by molly
he has always said that the breakin was to prove a prostitution ring run by Mo Dean. I love it!!!!!

on edit - the guy is nuts!!!

http://www.liddyletter.com/letter/victory.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
47. President Orders Criminal Activity - How very republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
govegan Donating Member (661 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
49. Nixon dishonest?!!!!!!!!!!
Man, is this revisionist history or what? <sarcasm>

Proof exists of Nixon's crookedness (i.e. corrupt dishonesty) prior to Watergate, as revealed on the Whitehouse tapes. From transcripts of Nixon's actual meeting with dairymen on March 23, 1971:

(Knowing the tapes were running, and having been presented with $3 million dollars in cash, Nixon was recorded)


"Uh, I know...that, uh, you are a group
that are politically very conscious...
And you're willing to do something
about it. And, I must say a lot of
businessmen and others...don't do
anything about it. And you do, and I
appreciate that. And I don't have to
spell it out."


After the dairymen had left, advisor John Connally was alone with Nixon, and said:

"They are tough political operatives.
This is a cold political deal."


On March 23, 1971, Secretary of the Treasury, John Connally summarized the day's events to Nixon:


"These dairymen are organized; they're
adamant, they're militant...And they,
they're massing an enormous amount
of money that they're going to put
into political activities, very frankly."




Get the whole story at http://www.notmilk.com/trickydick.html.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC