Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton says missile shield to protect from Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
B o d i Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:33 AM
Original message
Clinton says missile shield to protect from Iran
Source: Reuters

Tue Mar 3, 2009 12:43pm GMT

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reiterated the United States' intention to prevent Iran acquiring nuclear weapons on Tuesday but declined comment on a report Washington offered Russia a deal to help achieve that.

She was asked at a news conference with Israel's foreign minister in Jerusalem about a New York Times report that President Barack Obama wrote to Russia's president offering to hold off deploying a U.S. missile defence system in Europe in return for Russian help on obstructing Iran's nuclear programme.

Clinton said Washington shared Israel's concerns, denied by Tehran, that Iran was seeking nuclear weapons: "We intend to do all that we can to deter and prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons," she said, while repeating Obama's offer to engage with Iran under certain conditions.

On Russia, which opposes plans for a U.S. missile shield in Europe, she noted that she had met Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov briefly on Monday at an international meeting and would meet him again for longer on Friday:

"What we have said specifically in regard to missile defence in Europe is that it has always been intended to deter any missiles that might come from Iran," Clinton said. "It remains our position. We have explained that to the Russians before."

Read more: http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUKTRE5222ON20090303



I tried using a shotgun as an umbrella once, but I still got wet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. While we continue to disallow Iran nuclear weapons - how do we contribute
to enhancing Israels' nuclear weapons? Any new sales or trades with them - lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Utter non-sense
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 10:54 AM by wuushew
what would prompt any nation in the ME to non-sensically attack an unrelated nation in continental Europe?

Not only would it be a waste of expensive strategic assets but but it would serve no purpose in obtaining the rational or irrational goals of said country.


If we believe missile defense to involve the destruction of warheads during their terminal and not boost phase then the placement of such systems indicates the areas they are designated to protect.

All I see is an arrow formed from the Czech Republic to the Polish Baltic coast pointed straight at the heart of Russia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Bullshit of EPIC proportions. I expect better from the Obama admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Why do we believe that missile defense involves terminal phase intercept?
exo-atmospheric intercept is the norm - the Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) missiles going to Poland are built for exo-atmospheric intercepts. That being the case, Eastern Europe is the perfect location to intercept missiles from the ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. I personally like the strategy... force the Russians to get involved with Iran
Nothing wrong with a little dagger diplomacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. That was never the purpose of the "strategy".
The concept of a "missile shield", so far, has been little more than a boondoggle for the 'defense' industry. For the neocons it was a potential offensive weapon for threatening and bullying other countries - 'we can now attack you, but you can't attack us in return'. I don't think there is any legitimate purpose for a "missile shield". Thinking that Iran is going to attack Europe, and in fact, the whole manufactured Iranian nuclear "crisis" are products of a propaganda induced paranoia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheLastMohican Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Lavrov is an old and very experienced diplomat
He eats Condi for breakfast and Hillary for lunch.
There shouldn't be any mistake or understimation that Russians are complete idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Beware of costly defense spending..........
It is already way out of hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace_Sells Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. epic waste
And people complained about how big the stimulus bill was. This is an EPIC waste of time and money and this is not what I would expect of the Obama admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. She sounds like
an old worn out 78rpm record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You do realize it is her job to voice the POTUS' opinion, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. So, does that make her statement any the less bullshit?

The 'missile shield' is a useless boondoggle and serious provocation. It should be terminated with extreme prejudice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I think it's a waste of money (mostly because they don't work)
I was just stating that she's speaking for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes but in doing so
you excuse Ms C. Rice in one fell swoop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. And down the rabbit hole we go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. What happens to people when they become president?
Do they get a brain transplant courtesy of the military industrial complex? They always seem to fall into line pretty quickly. Yes, there are sometimes a few subtle nuances so it may only be a partial brain transplant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Makes one wonder if US Presidents hostile to the Global Aristocracy get a similar
speech (modified to take out the direct threats, of course, but to leave the meaning of direct threats) as Third World Presidents, as descirbed in "Confessions of an Economic Hitman"

Congratulations Mr. President," Mr. Perkins says, assuming the role of the businessman, or economic hit man, as he likes to call his previous profession. "I just want you to know that in this hand I have a couple of hundred million dollars for you and your family if you play the game our way." With the practiced timing of an expert storyteller, Mr. Perkins pauses. "And in this hand I have a gun with a bullet in case you decide to keep your campaign promises."

Quite frankly, given what we have seen the last 30 years in this ocuntry, it wouldn't surprise me on little bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC