|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
FreeState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 06:31 PM Original message |
Another marriage petition cleared for California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. How about another petition nicely asking all the Mormons to leave CA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Well if Ken Starr has his way that would be perfectly legal - after all all rights are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 06:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Excellent point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 06:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. it's actually according to california law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalNative (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 06:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. And that's why someone needs to start the initiative process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 07:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. i would agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 07:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. But only after Prop 8 is repealed - or someone needs to draft an amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 07:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. that would be kind of a meta-amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 07:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I see that - however is there a way around that to change the amendment process? n.t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 07:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. i would assume so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:13 AM Response to Reply #9 |
24. Even if you are correct, there seems to be no down side passing it anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreeState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 07:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Actually not - thats according to Starrs arguments - the court has yet to rule n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 08:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. ..with no limits . . . ?? They could vote to secede, or vote for slavery??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:01 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Well, they couldn't do something that violates the US Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:38 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I think the "equality for all" campaign is very smart . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:17 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. That begs the question whether the COTUS could be amended to repeal the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 08:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Don't see how Starr wasn't disbarred long ago for distortion of law!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Bacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. Oh no, just outlaw the wearing of any magic underwear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
10. Rec'd! Yes, it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
15. They need a law stating equal rights for all types of persons cannot be taken away by the majority, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-20-09 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
16. BINGO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GinaMaria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 08:39 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Marriage is not owned by the religions of this nation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:20 AM Response to Reply #16 |
26. I don't think getting rid of marriage entirely is going to be an easier sell than equal rights to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
17. I want to help gather signatures.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 08:33 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Up-Date.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:22 AM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Try contacting the Human Rights Campaign. Best wishes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
21. "Marriage is a civil contract" -- Brigham Young |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC