Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cleric's exit imperils Pakistan peace deal (with Taliban)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 10:00 AM
Original message
Cleric's exit imperils Pakistan peace deal (with Taliban)
Source: Associated Press

ISLAMABAD (AP) — A hard-line cleric who negotiated a peace accord that halted fighting between the Taliban and security forces in part of northwest Pakistan said Thursday he is leaving the region to protest the government's failure to impose Islamic law.

The announcement casts serious doubt on the durability of a cease-fire in the Swat valley that U.S. officials worry will create another sanctuary for allies of al-Qaida responsible for a rising tide of violence in the nuclear-armed country.

Imposing Islamic law in Swat, a one-time tourist haven, was the key plank of an accord worked out in February between the provincial government and Sufi Muhammad, a cleric who once led thousands of volunteers to fight U.S. forces in Afghanistan but has since renounced violence.

(snip)

But the militants have retained their arms and this week pushed into a neighboring area just 60 miles (100 kilometers) northwest of the capital, Islamabad, where they fought deadly gunbattles with villagers and police.



Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hkiMxbHNH0BqgpWA2ZG6VD6wVTmAD97F00QO0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Swat valley peace talks break down"
Source: Al Jazeera English

A religious leader who negotiated an agreement that ended fighting between the Taliban and security forces in Pakistan's Swat valley says he is pulling out of peace talks.

Sufi Muhammad said on Thursday that the reason for his withdrawal was that the government had been too slow to introduce sharia (Islamic law) in the region. He has left the Swat valley to set up a protest camp at his old headquarters in Malakand province. His statement calls into question the durability of a controversial peace effort in the valley, where fighting has forced thousands of residents to flee.

Asif Ali Zardari, Pakistan's president, has said he will sign an order introducing sharia in the region only once peace has been fully restored.

Government blamed

Al Jazeera's Kamal Hyder, reporting from Islamabad, said: "Sufi Mohammed, who was the key factor in brokering a peace deal in the Swat valley ... has blamed the central government directly for dragging their feet on the accord. "All this is happening at a time when the Swat Taliban has moved into an adjoining district and are saying that they cannot be stopped from going into other areas. That is going to be a very serious development and, if that peace accord does break down, it will have serious repercussions for the adjoining districts as well."

Also on Thursday, Mullah Nezaar, a Pakistani Taliban leader, released an audio message on the internet, claiming that his group is just days away from marching on the capital. "Pakistan Taliban factions have united ... The day is not far when Islamabad will be in the hands of the mujahidin." He also accused the Pakistan army of using spies to help the US carry out unmanned drone attacks on rural areas of Pakistan.

From: http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/04/200949101746198466.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "The day is not far when Islamabad will be in the hands of the mujahidin."
Is Pakistan a failed state yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sledgehammer Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. How Pakistan reacts...
...to Talibanisation will answer that.

I'm happy this deal is ending. Giving into the mullahs through legal means is a terrible thing.

Yes, it means a potentially long war with no end in sight. And most Pakistanis would like to avoid that. But there are a couple of recent factors that may change that attitude:

- First, the historic people's involvement is restoring the Chief Justice of Pakistan shows that Pakistanis are not apathetic. They can get involved if needed.

- Second, the backlash against Talibanization is beginning. When people started realizing what Nizam-e-Adl (the sharia styled laws that were to implemented in Swat) would do to basic human rights, lots of conservative Muslims were appalled (please note: conservative does not equal fundamentalist). The images of the girl being flogged had a huge effect on people. It's a very tiny backlash right now, and most people may not even realize it's happening, but it's there.

Pakistan can give in, or continue to fight. The US chose to fight to save the Union, rather than let slavery and secessionism succeed. Sri Lanka has chosen to fight Tamil rebels rather than given in to demands of a separate homeland.

Giving in to the mullahs, even on one inch of land, will cement Pakistan's status as a failed state. Fighting it, and winning it (militarily and psychologically) will change that status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Pakistan needs balkanization
a free Baluchistan and Sindhudesh will not allow talibanization that Pakistan's punjabi controlled military and ISI desire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sufi Mohammed calls off Swat peace deal ( on to stage II )

Sufi Mohammed calls off Swat peace deal


SWAT: The chief of outlawed Tehreek e Nifaz e Shariat Mohammedi has withdrawn from the peace deal with the government and has said all peace camps in the region will be abolished, DawnNews has reported. Mohammed, who brokered the peace deal between the Taliban and the government of Pakistan has claimed that the authorities have used delaying tactics in imposing the Nizam-i-Adal (Islamic courts) in the Swat region.

snip

Thanks in part to Muhammad's mediation, the agreement ended 18 months of terror and bloody clashes ( ? )
that had left hundreds dead and forced up to one-third of the previously prosperous valley's 1.5 million residents to flee. But the militants have retained their arms and this week pushed into a neighboring area where they fought deadly gunbattles with villagers and police.

snip

Zardari's foot-dragging also lets him save face with Western critics of the deal, he said.

snip
U.S. envoy Richard Holbrooke said Tuesday after meeting Zardari in Islamabad that the situation in Swat had helped persuade more of Pakistan's political elite of the need to combat extremism at America's side.


snip
On Thursday, one policeman died and five more were injured as protests erupted across the southwestern province of Baluchistan after the discovery of the mutilated bodies of three missing political activists.


Activists immediately blamed Pakistan's spy agencies for the political activists' deaths. Police said they were investigating.
.

snip
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/sufi+mohammed+calls+off+swat+peace+deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC