Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader tells worried Democrats to lighten up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 05:11 AM
Original message
Nader tells worried Democrats to lighten up
Nader tells worried Democrats to lighten up
Maverick says his candidacy is aimed squarely at Bush

Marc Sandalow, Washington Bureau Chief
Tuesday, February 24, 2004


Washington -- Ralph Nader had a message Monday for Democratic Party leaders and the liberal intelligentsia that is up in arms over his candidacy.

"Relax and rejoice," Nader said as he gave a full airing to his reasons for another run for the presidency. "Rejoice that you have another front carrying the ancient but unfulfilled pretensions and aspirations of the Democratic Party.''

Four years after Nader told Americans that a vote for Al Gore was no better than a vote for George W. Bush, won almost 2.9 million votes, and -- according to many analysts -- drew just enough support from the Democrats to deprive them of the White House, there was no evidence of relaxing or rejoicing. Democratic reaction ranged from disbelief to annoyance to fury.

Yet even as Nader railed against "corporatism" and the "two-party duopoly, " there was widespread agreement about one aspect of his quixotic drive for the presidency: The consumer advocate does not pose the threat to Democrats in 2004 that he did in 2000.
(snip/...)

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/02/24/MNGV556VID1.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. God I fucking hate that man right now...
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. Why bother? We're assured by "everyone" that Kerry's "electable". (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. The only pity is that he isn't the Democratic nominee
How the party could use someone of his intellect, vision, and uncompromising integrity. Sigh.

If we ever rid ourselves of the present corporate leadership, we might get the party back on track to represent average people - and thereby attract candidates of a higher caliber. Until then...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. He should have run in the primaries.
I'd suggest that Kucinich would end up with more delgates than Ralph would have gotten.

Ralph should have stuck with the structural problem of corvairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Kucinich? Heck Sharpton, Braun, and Graham would probably
get more delegates than Ralph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5thGenDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Ralph Nader was paid UP FRONT to write "Unsafe at Any Speed"
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 02:16 PM by 5thGenDemocrat
Saint Ralph was nothing more than a mercenary paid $2000 in advance by publisher Robert Grossman to hack out a hatchet job "exposing" the automakers' lack of concern for safety. The book wasn't even Nader's idea, originally.
Nader also wasn't responsible for the redesign of the Corvair's rear axle (a flaw which was real and did lead to people being killed and maimed). Chevrolet Division Manager Bunkie Knudsen was.
Knudsen's niece was maimed in a Corvair accident (Cadillac Division Manager Cal Werner's son was killed in one) and Knudsen threatened to resign from GM and take the matter public if the corrections weren't made (at a cost of $15 per unit, BTW).
These corrections HAD BEEN MADE before Unsafe even hit the bookstores. The Corvairs then on the lots were perfectly safe, reliable and economical. But GM couldn't sell them in the wake of Saint Ralph's screed and a lot of folks here in my hometown lost their jobs because of it.
John
Nader was little more than a hired gun. But nobody here would ever give the real hero of the story, Knudsen, credit for standing up to GM and saving lives because he's, you know, a corporatist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Real interesting, John.
The stuff you learn on DU.....another perception of Ralph debunked.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5thGenDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Thank you -- it just takes a little reading
The part about Saint Ralph being paid up front is from David Halberstam's "The Reckoning," p 494.
The story of Knudsen, the death and injuries and the redesign is from "On a Clear Day You Can See General Motors -- John Z. DeLorean's Look Inside the Automotive Giant," by J. Patrick Wright, pp 54-55.
John
The snarky attitude towards Saint Ralph is strictly my own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. "Uncompromising integrity"??????????????????????????!!!!!!!
Uh, that is NOT the Ralph Nader who is running in this election.

Even the Greens won't touch him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. Ralph has integrity?
What? When he said Gore was NO BETTER than Bush? Or when he said it did not matter if the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. I don't think that Nader
has a clue about the economy. I heard him speak the other day and he seemed to know nothing about outsourcing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Relax and rejoice
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 06:19 AM by Paschall
I hope these words do to Nader what the rearend collision did to the Chevrolet Corvair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waterman Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. Ha! Nice one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5thGenDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. Well, since I'm already here, anyhow
Edited on Wed Feb-25-04 02:54 PM by 5thGenDemocrat
Ford Pintos exploded in rear-end collisions.
The Corvair's early, deadly problem had to do with its independent rear suspension, compounded by its rear-engine design.
When an early Corvair was put into a turn at fairly high speed, the rear tires would toe-in, much like what happens when you point the tips of your skis toward each other while going downhill at high speed. When the rear tires recontacted the road, the cars flipped.
At first, GM wrote the problem off to reckless driving (the Corvair was quite a sporty car -- very popular with young drivers). As the testing was done and the facts came out, it proved to be a design flaw.
I've alluded to the rest of the story already.
John
Yes, the early Corvairs were deadly. But Knudsen's efforts resulted in having a stabilizing bar (which prevented the toe-in) installed in the 1965 models and an entirely redesigned suspension put in for the 1966 and later years.
ON EDIT: I'm writing the above from memory -- not from direct references. Also, I moved the dates of the corrections ahead one year. Either way, my point about the redesign stands. They were completed before the publication of 'Unsafe at Any Speed.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lighten up? Yeah, as if Bushism is a joke. Well it is to Ralphie.
I'm sure he finds Bushism amusing. As noted in the top ten conservative idiots, as a millionaire, he's certainly enjoying his tax cut.

I'm glad he's amused.

BTW, what is this fucking Republican doing telling us what Democratic Principles are? Does he think he IS fucking George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annagull Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Heh, heh, heh
Nader is about as relevent as Larouche, good luck spoiler!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. um,that's the point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corticoline Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Nader's running won't make any difference this time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaySherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Why don't you think so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I can't answer for the other poster
but I honestly believe he just wont get near the amount of votes he did last time.The Greens I know wont vote for him,I wont vote for him (and I could here in Mass).I just dont see him being a factor at all,contrary to much of the hysterics you see here daily about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. I think so too...
... his bullsh*t claim that "there's no difference between the Reps and the Dems" has been laid to rest for anyone with an IQ above 50.

Ignore him and he'll go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I agree. We should just ignore this little brat. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. He is the enemy now
taunting Democrats - the last hurrah from another delusional politician gone the way of the arrogance of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. over the top

all politicians are delusional even the democractic ones

at least ralph doesn't walk around in a pink tutu
licking corporate asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm surprised he didn't say "Get over it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well thankfully
he didn't use Kerry's line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. Mari333 to Nader..Bugger off
he doesnt have a kid in Iraq in the middle of a bloodbath..hes as bad as the rest of the comfortable cowards who sit in their leather EZ chairs and pop open champagne and beer as they watch this bloodbath like a football game.
F*ck him and the rest of the GOP Cabal, including the DINOs .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waterman Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
20. Ralph operates with a major charisma deficit. I'm surprised his handlers
haven't gotten that through to him yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I'm surprised...
... he has handlers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I'm surprised that he has a following
Regardless of what he says and what you believe, he's one of the creepiest looking people on Earth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. Nader as Anti-Christ
Relax and rejoice I am your savior.

Talk about a false prophet!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. Nader worried that light-em up might not work?
Here Ralph, let me give you this, you can hold on to it while you make your calls for no difference>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nuke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trixie Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'm torn.......
Democracy in action and the ability for anyone to run......... and the thought of him just realizing the need to remove Bush and putting up someone who can win.

I have said all year that if he runs again I would personally drive to his house and slap him. My fellow staffers wonder why I am still at work. :hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
34. It's not the votes he will GET that will cost us....
It's the votes that will stay HOME because he's running.
What's his chances of getting on the ballot in all 50? I know *I* won't sign a petition for him. I didn't sign one for Larouche, either.

There are going to be a LOT of disillusioned Howard Dean supporters who feel like they got left at the altar, and since Ralph won't make the ballot in their state, and they can't vote for Dean, and they're angry at Dean ("DUDE! All those meet-ups I put together, those sign-ups at Starbucks, the money I collected for you, and you just up and fuckin' QUIT? Fuck YOU, Man! 'Don't vote for any third party candidates' my ASS! You fuckin' QUITTER! I'll vote for whoever I god-damn wanna! And it ain't gonna be anyone YOU suggest!") then they'll stay home again, just like they did in '00.

They're gonna "send a message", don't forget. Hope they all remember what that message was when they get their "From the President of the United States: Greetings!" letters in the mail next year....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC