Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Possible compromise emerges in health care debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Old Coot Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 08:34 PM
Original message
Possible compromise emerges in health care debate
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON – A potential compromise emerged Wednesday on one of the most vexing issues of the health care overhaul debate — whether to create a new government-sponsored health plan to compete with private insurers.

The compromise offered by Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., would create health care cooperatives owned by groups of residents and small businesses, similar to how electric or other cooperatives operate. They'd be nonprofit, and without the government involvement that troubles Republicans and business groups about the public plan options.

The chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, said Wednesday the idea could be key to a bipartisan health bill. Baucus raised it in a meeting with President Barack Obama, saying later that Obama showed interest. Baucus' Republican counterpart, Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, also said the concept had potential.

<snip>

Conrad's plan attempts to satisfy both sides. Profit-making insurance companies wouldn't run the show, but there also wouldn't be the federal government backing that Republicans fear would eliminate fair competition with private companies. The co-ops could get federal seed money, Conrad said, but that would be the end of federal involvement. The co-ops would negotiate directly with medical providers.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090610/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. And if you are unhappy, as a consumer, with your public plan, what recourse do you have?
I say that everyone who is insured gets a voting share in the company.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I reject Conrad's proposal
It's still hot air. Kent, I want your coverage, or you lose it. Fair enough?

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaLittle Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. ANOTHER BullShit Proposal! These Klowns Just Cannot Piss Off The Insureance Companies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Republicans fear would eliminate fair competition with private companies"
I think this is double talk for "Republicans fear would eliminate price gouging by private companies"

Notice how the media has already labeled this as a "compromise," thereby assuring that any opposition to it will be seen as "partisan..."
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Utter Rubbish
These fuckers will do anything to serve their corporate masters while keeping a fig leaf for cover.

Shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. IF they impose all of the other restrictions in the Kennedy
bill on private insurance companies I wouldn't fight it. If it is a way of getting out of

The logistics of this make it unlikely to succeed. You would have to get a VERY large group, with a mixture of health conditions to be able to provide care for reasonable premiums. Small group plans are enormously expensive because they have to be able to sock away enough money to cover individuals with very large health expenses. Most places that specialize in small group insurance charge very high rates or decline to issue a policy. Getting favorable contracts with providers also requires a large population; without favorable contracts (1/3-1/2 of the costs that would otherwise be charged to uninsured individuals) the cost would be far higher for the coop to provide care than to purchase it from an insurance company.

On top of the economic constraints, it would require creating an administrative organization to negotiate contracts with hospitals, review and pay claims, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Conrad's plan guts the whole idea of a public option. Let's just do single payer and quit
messing around with a bunch of jive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. I thought by keeping the health insurance companies alive
Kennedy's bill was the compromise. I've said all along it was stupid to start bargaining with what the package you're willing to settle for. Conrad's idea is the first example of what kind of crap we can expect in the final bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. It's actually the second example of a weak PO. Then there's "Trigger", the wonder stalking hore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyLoochka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. A huge risk pool is what is needed
To bring costs down and pay claims. They are doing everything to kill that.

Effective insurance operates on the "law of large numbers." That's one of the major things so inefficient about having so many different private insurers operating where there is 100% risk of every single person dying - with the vast majority needing medical care while doing so. It won't help at all to have a bunch of small cooperatives.

Jeaezus they think we're stupid.

This is pure bull shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Screw that, theres no savings using small regional pools
Without a national plan a public option is no option.

If this is the best these corrupt bastards can come up with dont bother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Probably something like "Free coverage for the rick / tax the poor."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Keep calling and faxing our elected Reps. Tell them: NO WAY!
We got their attention. Keep the pressure up and don't give in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I called Pelosi and emailed Feinstein!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Don't email without doing the other options, phone, fax & snail mail.
I understand it's easy for them to ignore email. However, phones and faxes are noisy and can jam up "business as usual". Snail mail that arrives in envelopes has to be stamped in and looked at before it's shredded. Sometimes you need to do the 3D option. Email is very 2D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Having once worked in a congressional office I know that it is easy
for them to ignore email and snail mail but a little more difficult to ignore a phone call or a fax. I want single payer because it is the best for my country and the best for the patients. I also think that it will not hurt the providers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. thanks! will do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is why the public optioners should of been Single-Payers
You picked a plan easy to fuck and jive with. Thats the way this cookie crumbles for another 50 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. there really is no way to dress up health for profit and make it palatable
is there? No matter what they do, the underlying stink comes right up and hits the nostrils immediately.
WTF is it with you Conrad? You and Baucus smoking buffalo turds or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fuck him and the rest of these turds.
After all we wouldn't want anything that actually COMPETED with HEALTHCO's sacred RIGHT to extract RENT from each and every one of us peasants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. "compromise" = BEND OVER. You're screwed (or soon will be!) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. fuck that.
these folks don't want government ran because private insurers would tank, and these fuckers know that a large portion of their re-election gravy trains would dry up. quit fucking around!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moonbatmax Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. The Phrase, "Divide and Conquer" Comes to Mind (n/t)
Edited on Wed Jun-10-09 09:51 PM by moonbatmax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Insurance companies are vampires, parasites.
It's us or them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quidam56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. We are the change We voted for in November
if we want change, we have to stand up and be heard. http://www.wisecountyissues.com/?p=62 In East Tennessee and southwest Virginia, Profit Care is more important than Patient Care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
26. Conrad seems eager to compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toopers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. Unless our leaders have to use the same plan . . .
then we should not be forced into anything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC