Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AIG's ex-CEO had private jet fly stock to Bermuda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 11:19 PM
Original message
AIG's ex-CEO had private jet fly stock to Bermuda
Source: Reuters

18 Jun 2009, 0555 hrs IST, REUTERS

NEW YORK: The former head of ailing US insurance giant AIG told a court on Wednesday that he had a private jet fly a large block of the company's stock to Bermuda from New York to prevent AIG from seizing it. "It was a reaction to the entire environment that was emerging between AIG and Starr International," Maurice "Hank" Greenberg told US District Judge Jed Rakoff. "It was starting to get very ugly."

A key witness in the dispute between Starr International and American International Group, Greenberg appeared peevish under questioning by the lawyer for his former company, Ted Wells. Greenberg also admitted to being "angry" at suddenly losing his job at the company that he had built into the world's largest insurer.

"Yes. It was sudden and abrupt....Yes I was angry," he told Wells when asked about his ouster. AIG is suing Starr International for $4.3 billion in damages representing the sale of millions of AIG shares since Greenberg left the insurer and the return of more than 185 million AIG shares that Starr International controls. AIG accuses Greenberg, chairman of the privately held, Bermuda-based Starr, of illegally taking the stock, worth at one point at least $20 billion, in 2005.

AIG contends the shares were pledged to fund a deferred compensation plan for selected employees. Starr disputes that saying the beneficiary of the shares was always a charitable trust. Wells told Judge Rakoff that a private jet was flown from Bermuda to New York in late September 2005 so that Starr representatives, accompanied by bodyguards, could transfer the shares to accounts in Bermuda.


Read more: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/LATEST-NEWS/AIGs-ex-CEO-had-private-jet-fly-stock-to-Bermuda/articleshow/4669572.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
keroro gunsou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. um...
and this ex-employee isn't being stung up by his obviously over-sized balls because?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mackerel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't get it, why do so few care about all this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because he's not a black man carrying Gatorade from a New Orleans Wal-Mart.
Edited on Thu Jun-18-09 06:06 AM by urgk
Then we'd just shoot him and be done with it. He'd be taking away some white store owner's God-given right to pretend it was looted, then sell it on ebay and collect the insurance money.

As it is, this guy has only taken what? Millions? Billions?

(Just to make sure -- sarcasm sign fully lit)

I'm constantly and unfortunately reminded of this Eddie Murphy skit from SNL -- (WARNING: There are ads with almost-nudity that may be NSFW around this clip) http://mojoflix.com/Video/White-Eddie-Murphy.html)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Because the SHEEP care more about the trials of
John & Kate plus 8

The Octo slut

and Brittney's Beaver shot

(Not necessarily in that order)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Or who wins American Idol. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. dupe. n/t
Edited on Thu Jun-18-09 10:30 AM by OhioChick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. because this was a fund to pay bonuses to execs when they retire
The only people covered by fund were executive and other highly paid employees. The people that are making too much money compared to the normal employee. I'd be more concerned if it it was something that was supposed to benefit all the employees, but it's a case of overprivedged execs feeding on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. So whose pension fund was it, exactly?
Who ARE the "selected employees"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Mr. A. White, B. White, C. White, D. White, E. White, F. White. G. White, H. White, J. White, K. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. $20 billion flown to Bermuda - and transferred out of the country
so when does the FBI and the IRS and RICO and lots of other alphabet soup orgs get involved?

Oh, that's right! These were the "smart guys" in the room! The ones that have looted the stuppppiiiidd little taxpayers of more than

$185 Billion in Bailouts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. It's not treason if you're rich.
Taxes are for the little people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. The bigger they are...
The harder they fail.

The Titanic was once thought to be, "too big to fail"...

I predict another Kenny Boy class departure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Haole Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. These stories go on and on...
and nothing seems to change in corporate America.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Yep
Must be nice to have no accountability for anything to anyone, ever. There seems to be a lot of that going around in America lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. Another popular scam by CEO's and BODs is to fund executive's pensions
Edited on Thu Jun-18-09 07:58 AM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
and deferred compensation in privately held shell companies that are separate and protected when the companies they looted for their own benefit go down for the count into bankruptcy. Rank and file employees lose their retirements, pensions, etc. but the big boys are always taken care of.

If I were Queen of the Universe, with one stroke of my pen, I would make these special entity cookie jars illegal and require that executive compensations, retirements, etc. must come from the same general funding as all employees and that all existing such entities be dissolved and the funds returned to their PUBLICLY HELD COMPANY AND SHAREHOLDERS AND CREDITORS.

Again, why these shenanigans can't just be called for what they appear to be to me, I'll never know: fraud, conversion, theft, embezzlement, etc.etc.etc. But, what do I know? Aside from too big to fail, we also have too big to prosecute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. The problem with this lawsuit is if AIG wins
more people in their company get money.

I like the Greenberg is being exposed as the criminal he is, but does anyone really want AIG being AWARDED more $$$$$?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well, I think it is better being returned to the larger entity
than being sucessfully held as the cookie jar for a very few. AIG can pay beck some of their bailout with that money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. AIG Owes the US Billions
and I doubt the stock is worth more than $1.45
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. Greed is the number one industry in this Country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hoping this pig goes to jail before a Ken Lay style heart attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Second Stone Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. Declare the shares null and void for fraud
so that ought to keep the creep out of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC